Cases

Affirmed by published .opinion. Judge-Niemeyer wrote the opinion, in which Judge Duncan and Judge Floyd joined. NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge: When Robin Fleming flew his glider plane over the H.B. Robinson Nuclear Plant—operated by Duke Energy Progress, Inc., in Darlington County, South Carolina—and then began circling repe

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: In 2006, the Florida Legislature enacted the Florida Renewable Energy Technologies and Energy Efficiency Act 1 (the "Act"). The Act authorized the Florida Public Service Commission ("PSC") to create a plan to incentivize energy utilities to invest in nuclear power plant construction.

ORDER RICHARD W. STORY, District Judge. This case comes before the Court on Defendant Bobby Hamil’s Motion to Dismiss [11], Defendant Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia’s Motion to Dismiss [12], Defendant Bobby Hamil’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint [18], and Defendant Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amende

BRYANT, Judge. *2 Where plaintiff had a right to enter defendants' properties pursuant to a valid easement, we affirm the trial court's ruling of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff. In 1911, the predecessor to plaintiff Duke Energy Progress, Inc., recorded with the Wake Co

748 F.Supp.2d 656 (2010) DUKE ENERGY INTERNATIONAL, L.L.C. et al., Plaintiffs, v. Michael J. NAPOLI, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. H-09-2408. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. September 21, 2010. *662 Gerard G. Pecht, Amy Garzon, Brian Cody Boyle, Fulbright Jaworski LLP, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff

McGEE, Judge. Aaron Lorenzo Dorsey (“Mr. Dorsey”) was shot and killed by a Duke University Police officer at approximately 1:00 a.m. on 13 March 2010, just outside the main entrance to Duke University Hospital in Durham (“the hospital”). When the shooting occurred, Preston Locklear was being treated for a serious injury in the intensive care unit of the hospital. A number of mem

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th of January 2015 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th of June 2015." Therefore the case is docketed as of t

BYE, Circuit Judge. Duke Grider (“Grider”) and Kami Lee Grider filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Missouri state law claiming officers of the Springfield Police Department violated Grider’s statutory and constitutional rights, in part by using excessive force. The parties' filed motions for summary judgment. As relevant to this appeal, the district court found

EDMUNDS, Justice. *3 Defendant Herbert A. Gray (defendant) owns real property located in Huntersville, North Carolina. Plaintiff Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (plaintiff or Duke) owns an easement allowing construction of and access to its power lines. A portion of defendant’s property encroaches on plaintiffs e

Opinion and Order Bruce Howe Hendricks, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on the motion of the Defendants Duke Energy, Inc.,1 and William “Randy” Gideon (collectively the “Duke Defendants”) for summary judgment (ECF No. 135) and on the motion of Defendants JW Byrd, Joyce C. Everett, Gary Streett, and the Darlington County Sheriffs Office (collectivel

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 17th of June 2015 by Plaintiff-Appellant: "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of June 2015." Plaintiff-Appellant shall have up to and including the 20th day of July 2015 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th of July 2015 by NC League of Municipalities for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief: "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 21st of July 2015." Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within *314

J.C. Duke Associates, Inc. ("Duke"), petitions this Court for a writ of mandamus ordering the trial court to vacate its order denying Duke's motion to dismiss the claims against it pursuant to Ala. Code 1975, § 6-5-440, Alabama's abatement statute. We grant the petition and issue the writ. I. Facts and Procedural Posture In February 2005, Duke sued C.L. Roofing Professionals, Inc., and DelZak Builders, Inc., in the M

OPINION GRABER, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff Richard Gebhardt, a United States citizen, filed 1-130 petitions with the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”), seeking Legal Permanent Residence (“LPR”) status for his non-citizen wife and her three non-citizen children. The Secretary of Homeland Securit

698 S.E.2d 424 (2010) Alicia Danielle MOSTELLER, Plaintiff, v. DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION, a North Carolina Corporation; Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, a North Carolina Limited Liability Company; and William Ray Walker, Defendants. No. COA09-277. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. September 7, 2010. *426 Brown, Moore & Associates,

1. Pit’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA14-283) 1. Allowed 2. Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc. and Public Service Company of North Carolina, Inc. d/b/aPSNC Energy’s Conditional Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief 2. Allowed 3. North Carolina Electric Membership Corporation and the North Carolina Association of Electric Cooperatives’ Conditional Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 29th day of June 2005 by Attorney General for Extension of Time to File Brief:"Motion Allowed. Attorney General (State of NC) shall have up to and including the 23rd day of August 2005 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 30th day of June 2005."

MAY, Judge, dissenting. [27] The majority determines “neither 170 I.A.C, 4-1-26, nor the 2002 NESC, placed Bellwether on notice that Duke’s control over land surrounding the Easement widened from ten to approximately twenty-three feet due to horizontal strike clearance requirements.” (Op. at 1046.) I believe we are required to hold Bellwether did have notice, and I must therefore respectfully dissent.

* * * * * * * * * * * Upon review of the competent evidence of record with reference to the errors assigned and finding no good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence or to rehear the parties or their representatives, the Full Commission affirms the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner with minor modifications. * * * * * * * * * * * The Full Commission finds as fact and c

Chief Justice PLEICONES. We granted certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ decision affirming the administrative law judge’s finding that the principal recovered from the sale of short-term securities was not includible in the sales factor of the multi-factor apportionment formula, and, therefore, Duke Energy was not entitled to a tax refund. See Duke Energy Corp. v