Cases

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 15a0252p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ WILLIAM BROWN III, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellant

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: Members of three rural power cooperatives allege that the cooperatives have failed to refund excess "patronage capital" to their members as required by state law. They request a refund of capital above a specific ratio of equity to assets established in the cooperatives' agreements with the federal Rural Utilities Service, and the appointment of

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER William 0. Bertelsman, United States District Judge This case presents a significant Erie question: whether a federal court must follow the rule announced by the Supreme Court of Kentucky that evidence of a defendant trucking company’s alleged negligence in hiring, training, supervision, en-trustment and retention, is admissible, even if the defendant trucking company

OPINION Rebeca Huddle, Justice In this interlocutory appeal, Justin Jordan challenges the trial court’s denial, as untimely, of Jordan’s motion to dismiss under the Texas Citizens’ Participation Act (TCPA). Benjamin Hall III sued Jordan alleging that Jordan placed a defamatory and illegal political radio advertisement about Hall during Hall’s mayoral campai

PER CURIAM: Appellants Ulrika Browning, Timothy Higgins, and Wendy Higgins, appeal the October 6, 2004, order of the Circuit Court of Upshur County that granted summary judgment to Appellees, Judith Halle and Andreas Halle, in Appellants’ action against Appellees for nuisance, interference with riparian rights, *91and negligence. For the reasons that follow, we affirm

Brown, Judge. [1] Nancy McDaniel, as personal representative of the estate of her husband, Fred C. McDaniel, III (the "Estate"), appeals the trial court's entry of summary judgment in a medical malpractice action in favor of Dr. William C. Erdel and Indiana Gastroenterology, Inc. ("Indiana Gastroenterology"). The Estate raises one issue which we restate as whether the court erred in ent

In re Brown, William III; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 97-5927; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 03-KH-239. This application is transferred to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal for consideration pursuant to the procedures outlined in that court’s en banc resolution of September 9, 2008. See State v. Cordero, 08-1717 (La.10-03-08),

03/06/2025 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 22, 2024 Session Heard at Cookeville1 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. WILLIAM RIMMEL, III Appeal by Permission from the Court of Criminal Appeals Circuit Court for Marion County No. 11136A J.

277 F.3d 1166 (9th Cir. 2002) WILLIAM J. BROWN, III, ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, AND ON BEHALF OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANTv.MCI WORLDCOM NETWORK SERVICES, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLEE No. 00-56171 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Argued and Submitted December 7, 2001Filed January 17, 2002

*1264 PER CURIAM: Ronald William Brown appeals his 240-month sentence, after pleading guilty to eight counts of possession and receipt of child pornography. We affirm his sentence but remand for the limited purpose of correcting a scrivener’s error in the judgment. I. BACKGROUN

In re Brown, William, III; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 97-5927; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 03-KH-239. Denied.

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge RESTANI wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge ERVIN and Senior Circuit Judge SPROUSE joined. OPINION RESTANI, Judge: This appeal centers on the factual sufficiency of allegations of employment discrimination made by plaintiff-appellant Paul A. Carter, an African-American, against William L. Ball

DAVIS, Justice: This appeal was filed by William L. .Gill (“Mr. Gill”) from an adverse final order of the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review (“the Board”). The Board’s order reversed a decision by the Workers’ Compensation Office of Judges (“the OOJ”), which had added four new diagnoses to Mr. Gill’s initial com-pensable claim for a lumbar and thoracic sprain injury. The Board

Cite as 2023 Ark. App. 103 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II No. CR-22-128 WILLIAM DANIEL MOSLEY III Opinion Delivered February 22, 2023 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE COLUMBIA COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT V.

233 F.Supp.2d 1223 (2002) BROWNING-FERRIS INDUSTRIES, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. CIV.00-440-PHX-SMM. United States District Court, D. Arizona. July 29, 2002. *1224 Paul James Mooney, David Michael Call, Fennemore Craig PC, Phoenix, AZ, Nancy T. Bowen, William S. Lee, Steph

DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge: The Prison Litigation Reform Act requires a prisoner to exhaust administrative remedies before filing suit. When a prisoner filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 after exhausting those remedies, the district court held t

John William Brown III was convicted of assault in the second degree, a violation of § 13A-6-21(a)(3), Ala. Code 1975. He was sentenced to six years' imprisonment. The sentence was split, and he was ordered to serve 18 months in confinement, to be followed by 4 years on probation. On appeal, Brown contends that the trial court erred in refusing his request that the jury be instructed on the lesser included offense of assault in the third degre

The appellant, William Pelham Browning, appeals from the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief under Rule 32, A.R.Crim.P. The appellant was convicted for trafficking in marijuana and was sentenced to 12 years in prison. This court affirmed the appellant's conviction and the Alabama Supreme Court denied certiorari review. Browning v. State,549 So.2d 548 (Ala.Cr.App. 1989). In his petition for post-conviction relief, the app

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge. The Illinois State Police terminated William Kidd III from its employ shortly before he completed his probationary year of training and service as a state trooper. Kidd, who is African-American, filed suit under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a). Although Kidd concedes that he was not performing at an accepta

Opinion for the Court PER CURIAM. PER CURIAM: Stripped to its essentials, this case presents the question whether a federal district court’s denial of a motion to remand is subject to interlocutory review. We hold that it is not and accordingly dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Although the disposition of this appeal