Cases

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 15a0252p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ WILLIAM BROWN III, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellant

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: Members of three rural power cooperatives allege that the cooperatives have failed to refund excess "patronage capital" to their members as required by state law. They request a refund of capital above a specific ratio of equity to assets established in the cooperatives' agreements with the federal Rural Utilities Service, and the appointment of

*1264 PER CURIAM: Ronald William Brown appeals his 240-month sentence, after pleading guilty to eight counts of possession and receipt of child pornography. We affirm his sentence but remand for the limited purpose of correcting a scrivener’s error in the judgment. I. BACKGROUN

277 F.3d 1166 (9th Cir. 2002) WILLIAM J. BROWN, III, ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, AND ON BEHALF OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANTv.MCI WORLDCOM NETWORK SERVICES, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLEE No. 00-56171 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Argued and Submitted December 7, 2001Filed January 17, 2002

In re Brown, William III; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 97-5927; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 03-KH-239. This application is transferred to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal for consideration pursuant to the procedures outlined in that court’s en banc resolution of September 9, 2008. See State v. Cordero, 08-1717 (La.10-03-08),

SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 6D2023-4157 Lower Tribunal No. 2022-DR-002424 _____________________________ WILLIAM THOMAS FICKA, III, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. KARLA LYNN BROWN, f/k/a

OPINION BY PRESIDENT JUDGE LEAVITT Edward B. Brown, III, Barbara L. Do-ran, Robert C. Jubelirer, Anthony P. Lu-brano, Ryan J. McCombie, William F. Oldsey, and Alice W. Pope (collectively, Trustees) serve on the Board of Trustees of The Pennsylvania State University (University). They have appealed an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Centre County (trial court) that denied their request for reim

OPINION Rebeca Huddle, Justice In this interlocutory appeal, Justin Jordan challenges the trial court’s denial, as untimely, of Jordan’s motion to dismiss under the Texas Citizens’ Participation Act (TCPA). Benjamin Hall III sued Jordan alleging that Jordan placed a defamatory and illegal political radio advertisement about Hall during Hall’s mayoral campai

Opinion for the Court PER CURIAM. PER CURIAM: Stripped to its essentials, this case presents the question whether a federal district court’s denial of a motion to remand is subject to interlocutory review. We hold that it is not and accordingly dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Although the disposition of this appeal

In re Brown, William, III; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 97-5927; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 03-KH-239. Denied.

John William Brown III was convicted of assault in the second degree, a violation of § 13A-6-21(a)(3), Ala. Code 1975. He was sentenced to six years' imprisonment. The sentence was split, and he was ordered to serve 18 months in confinement, to be followed by 4 years on probation. On appeal, Brown contends that the trial court erred in refusing his request that the jury be instructed on the lesser included offense of assault in the third degre

FEW, C.J. Gregory Brown brought this action for partition of real property that he and his five siblings owned together, and for an accounting of expenses he paid to preserve the property. The master-in-equity ordered the five siblings to pay Gregory their share of the expenses, partitioned the property by sale rather than in kind, and awarded Gregory attorney’s fees and costs. The siblings appeal those decisions. We affirm th

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Denied.

FLAUM, Chief Judge. Lawrence Brown III was convicted, following his guilty plea, of possession of two sawed-off shotguns and a destructive device. Brown now appeals his conviction, arguing that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence gathered as a result of a protective pat-down search. For the reasons stated herein, we affirm.

Judgment rendered at ____________ p.m. on August 27, 2019. No. 53,265-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** CHARLES LEE GRAY, Plaintiff-Appellees ARTHUR LEONARD SEALY, III, AND PAUL EDWARD PEEK, SR. versus JASON TREVOR BR

Debra Denise Ratliff Brown ("the mother") appeals an order that amended the child-custody and child-support provisions of a divorce judgment. We affirm. In September 2004, the mother sued William Worth Brown III ("the father") for a divorce and sought primary physical custody of the parties' only child, a daughter named Amanda, who was born in 1995. The father answered the mother's complaint and counterclaimed for a divorce and for primary physical custody of Amanda. After rece

Brown, Judge. [1] Nancy McDaniel, as personal representative of the estate of her husband, Fred C. McDaniel, III (the "Estate"), appeals the trial court's entry of summary judgment in a medical malpractice action in favor of Dr. William C. Erdel and Indiana Gastroenterology, Inc. ("Indiana Gastroenterology"). The Estate raises one issue which we restate as whether the court erred in ent

Pamela L. Reeves, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Defendants have moved for summary judgment [D. 59] on all of Plaintiff's claims [D. 57]. Because the claims are time-barred, Defendants' motion will be GRANTED . I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND Defendants, Exactech, Inc. and Exactech *814US,

WILLIAMS, J. Damon Tyler Brown (Appellant) appeals his convictions for one count of first-degree criminal sexual conduct (CSC) with a minor, three counts of lewd act upon a child, and three counts of first-degree sexual exploitation of a minor. Appellant argues the circuit court erred in allowing the State’s child abuse dynamics and delayed disclosures expert to testify regarding general behavioral characteristics because her