⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

2 opinions for “Willcox v. Lloyds TSB Bank, PLC”

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2014-02-14 · Published · cited 0× · 997 F. Supp. 2d 1352; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18715; 2014 WL 585496
ORDER DENYING TRANSFER JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman. Before the Panel: * Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, common defendant Lloyds TSB Bank pic (Lloyds) moves to centralize this litigation in the Northern District of *1353California. The litigation encompasses two actions (Dugan and Osmena) pending in that dist
District Court, S.D. California · 2019-04-17 · Published · cited 4× · 383 F. Supp. 3d 1069
JEFFREY T. MILLER, United States District Judge Defendant Securus Technologies, Inc. ("Securus") moves the court for a stay pending the Ninth Circuit's resolution of its Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(f) appeal. (Doc. No. 160.) Plaintiffs oppose. (Doc. No. 163.) For the reasons discussed below, the court grants Securus' motion to stay. BACKGROUND The background facts are well kn