Cases

623 F.Supp.2d 988 (2009) ECONOMY PREMIER ASSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff v. Monte M. EVERHART, Defendant. Case No. 08-6064. United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Hot Springs Division. March 25, 2009. John Jarrod Russell, Scott D. Provencher, Anderson, Murphy & Hopkins, L.L.P., Little Rock, AR, for Plaintiff. C. Burt Newell, Bachelor & Newell, Hot

DECISION The motion before the court is one for summary judgment. Plaintiff Premier Capital, Inc. ("Creditor") alleges that the Defendants, Jane Grosvenor Hand ("Debtor") and her husband, Gilbert C. Hand, violated the Rhode Island Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act ("UFTA"), G.L. 1956 §6-16-1, et seq., by transferring approximately $200,000 of the Debtor's inheritance into a joint ban

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge MICHAEL wrote the opinion, in which Judge GREGORY joined. Judge DUNCAN wrote a separate opinion concurring in the judgment. OPINION MICHAEL, Circuit Judge: This defamation case centers on the notorious U.S.-run Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq. Abu Ghraib prison is the place where *284Iraqi detainee

231 F.2d 498 97 U.S.App.D.C. 339 COASTAL BEND TELEVISION COMPANY, Appellant,v.FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, Appellee, Gulf CoastBroadcasting Company, Intervenor.COASTAL BEND TELEVISION COMPANY, Petitioner,v.UNITED STATES of America and the Federal CommunicationsCommission, Respondents, Gulf Coast BroadcastingCompany, Intervenor.MONONA BROADCASTING COMPANY and Bartell Television

604 F.3d 156 (2010) Judith J. MOFFITT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC; JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Defendants-Appellees. Lynn A. Fulmore, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Premier Financial Corporation, on behalf of Maximus Financial Corporation; Sovereign Bank, a U.S. Savings Bank, Defendants-Appellees. Edwin Ruble, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The Mortgage Consultants Incorporated, a Maryland Corporation; Banc

Becker, J. ¶1 The trial court approved as reasonable a total of 468.55 hours billed by two attorneys for taking a minor soft tissue injury case through a short trial de novo, where the defendant did not improve its position after a mandatory arbitration. The court then applied a multiplier of 2.0 because counsel, working on a contingent fee arrangement, substantially risked receiving no compensation or inadequate compensation. Un

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ___________ FILED February 5, 2024 No. 22-30686 Lyle W. Cayce ___________

USCA4 Appeal: 21-2351 Doc: 37 Filed: 11/22/2022 Pg: 1 of 17 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-2351 JAMES BOYKIN, lead plaintiff per order dated on 2/17/2021; ADNAN SAEED; CHAN-HEE KOH Plaintiffs - Appellants v. K12, INC.; NATHANI

GÓMEZ, Chief Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION (February 23, 2009) Before the Court is the motion of defendants Christian Kjaer; Helle Bundegaard; Steen Bundegaard; John Knud Fiirst; Kim Fiirst; and Nina Fiirst (together, the “Sellers”) to dismiss the negligent misrepresentation claim asserted in Count III of the complaint. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Affirmed by published opinion. ■ Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge NIEMEYER and Judge KING joined. WILKINSON, Circuit Judge: Wu Tien Li-Shou, a citizen of Taiwan, seeks damages from the United States for the accidental killing of her husband and the intentional sinking of her husband’s fishing- vessel during a NATO counter-piracy mission.

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-1684 STEVEN M. RECHT; ALESHA BAILEY; STEPHEN P. NEW, Plaintiffs – Appellees, v. PATRICK MORRISEY, in his capacity as Attorney General of the State of West Virginia, Defendant – Appellant, and JIM JUSTICE, in his official capacity as Governor of Wes

2025 IL App (2d) 240153 No. 2-24-0153 Opinion filed September 18, 2025 ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT ______________________________________________________________________________ ANTHONY P. SCIARRO

The summaries of the Colorado Court of Appeals published opinions constitute no part of the opinion of the division but have been prepared by the division for the convenience of the reader. The summaries may not be cited or relied upon as they are not the official language of the division. Any discrepancy between the language in the summary and in the opinion should be resolved in favor of the language in the opinion.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GERALD BRUCE LEE, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant CACI Premier Technology, Inc.’s (“CACI PT”) Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s Order Denying Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Based on the Statute of Limitations.1 (Dkt. No. 161.) This case concerns the well-publicized Abu Ghraib prison ab

Affirmed and remanded by published opinion. Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge KING and Judge AGEE joined. OPINION WILKINSON, Circuit Judge: This case involves two putative class actions, consolidated on interlocutory appeal, brought by purchasers of real estate brokerage services in South Carolina. Each complaint alleges that the real estate brokerages serving as board mem

MELODY J. STEWART, J.: {¶ 1} Pursuant to App.R. 26(A)(2), Loc. App.R. 26, and McFadden v. Cleveland State Univ. , 120 Ohio St.3d 54 , 2008-Ohio-4914

MELODY J. STEWART, JUDGE {¶ 1} As plaintiff-appellee Victoria Daniels was about to have surgery, the defendant-appellant-anesthesiologists Zoard Vasarhelyi, M.D. and Rostyslav Koziy, M.D., approved the placement of a transdermal patch on her to prevent postoperative nausea. Daniels appeared to have an allergic reaction to the patch and went into anaphylactic shock. She stopped breathin

NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, dissenting: The majority today disregards controlling Supreme Court precedents and belittles the gravity of the issues presented in these cases, purporting to find comfort in its narrow application of the collateral order doctrine. Its effort is regrettably threadbare. Military contractors performing work in the Iraqi war zone under the command and control of the Unite

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0245p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY; STATE OF TENNESSEE,

[Cite as Miller v. Mission Essential Group, L.L.C., 2023-Ohio-3077.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Chris W. Miller et al., : Plaintiffs-Appellees\ : Cross-Appellants, : No. 22AP-448 v. (C.P.C. No.