Cases

COX, Circuit Judge: Carol Wilkerson sued Grinnell Corporation, asserting, inter alia, claims under Title VII. The district court granted summary judgment on her Title VII claims because she failed to file a timely charge of discrimination and harassment with the EEOC. Since we conclude that Wilkerson filed a timely EEOC charge, we vacate the

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Hilda Ruffin, one of the plaintiffs below, appeals from a summary judgment in favor of General Motors Acceptance Corporation ("GMAC"), the defendant below. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand. *Page 2 Factual Background Ruffin, who is African-American, began working for GMAC as a level-2 credit clerk in GMAC's Gadsden office in 1985. In 1986, she was promoted to a level-3 credit clerk. In 1987, she was promoted

440 F.3d 558 Paul HOLOWECKI, Patricia Kennedy, Donna M. Lewis, Charles Moncalieri, Phyllis Nelson, Andy Kubicki, Elizabeth Tucker, Steven Almendarez, Frank J. Martinez, Kelly L. Martinez, Kevin McQuillan, Kenneth G. Mutchler, George Robertson, Nancy Thompics,individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.Docket No. -43376-CV.

OPINION OF THE COURT COWEN, Circuit Judge. This appeal arises from a suit by Charles Ries against the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) for damages resulting from an injury to his ankle. This case involves a modest amount of money, but an important issue of law. Specifically, we are asked to consider whether a violation of an Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) regulation establishe

MULLIGAN, Circuit Judge: More than a decade ago, on January 17, 1969, the United States of America, by its attorneys, acting under the direction of the Attorney General, filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York which alleged that International Business Machines Corporation (IBM),

400 F.Supp. 497 (1975) The DUPLAN CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. DEERING MILLIKEN, INC., et al., Defendants. DEERING MILLIKEN RESEARCH CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. The DUPLAN CORPORATION and Burlington Industries, Inc., Defendants. The DUPLAN CORPORATION et al., Plaintiffs on the Counterclaim, v. DEERING MILLIKEN RESEARCH CORPORATION, Defendant on the Counterclaim, and Deering Milliken, Inc., et al., Additional Defendant

JERRE S. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge. This is an antitrust case under sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2, seeking damages under section 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 15. The plaintiff, Multiflex, Inc., is a relatively new corporation that manufactures hydraulic hose bundles for use in oilfield drilling equipment. The defendant, Samuel Moore &

Judgment rendered August 9, 2023. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 55,157-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** LIONEL

MEMORANDUM OPINION VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION A. Procedural History Plaintiff James L. Ward (“Mr. Ward”) initiated this job discrimination lawsuit against Defendants United Parcel Service (“UPS”), Russell Hamrac (“Mr. Hamrac”), and Ron Headley (“Mr. Headley”), arising under the Americans with Disabilities Act (the “ADA”), as

WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judge: This appeal requires us to decide whether the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission revived an employee’s claim of discrimination—otherwise barred by the statute of limitations—when it vacated a two-year-old dismissal of the employee’s administrative charge and the Department of Justice issued the employee a new notice of the right to sue her emp

USCA11 Case: 24-11586 Document: 56-1 Date Filed: 12/22/2025 Page: 1 of 12 FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-11586 ____________________ ELENA MUKHINA,

ORDER Virginia Fugate worked at a Dollar General store in New Carlisle, Indiana. She quit after four-and-a-half years as manager and sued Dollar General Corporation (and a subsidiary, which for simplicity we ignore) under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. See 29 U.S.C. § 623(a)(1). Fugate, who was 49 when she left her job, alleged that she was constructively discharged because of her age. The district court granted su

USCA11 Case: 23-11902 Document: 45-1 Date Filed: 11/13/2024 Page: 1 of 40 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-11902 ____________________ VERONICA BAXTER, as Personal Re

WILLIAM M. CONLEY, District Judge *1046Plaintiff Thomas Blitz filed this putative class action against Monsanto Company, alleging that the label on its product includes the following false, misleading and deceptive statement: "Glyphosate targets an enzyme found in plants but not in people or pets." (See Compl. (dkt. # 1) ¶ 34.) Presently before the court is

MORENO, District Judge: Jamilia Jones sued her employer Allstate Insurance Company alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and Title VU’s prohibitions on sexual harassment and retaliation. Her failure to prove an adverse employment action defeats her ADA, FMLA and Title VII retaliation claims. Her sexual harassment claims under Title VII were not timely filed.

R. DAVID PROCTOR, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This case is before the court on the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 15) filed by *1189Defendant Nucor Steel Birmingham Inc. ("Nucor"). The parties have fully briefed the Motion to Dismiss. (Docs. # 15, 17, 18). For the reasons explained below, the Motion to Dismiss (Docs. # 15) is due to be granted i

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THE HONORABLE KEITH P. ELLISON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court are the partial motion to dismiss filed by Defendant Academy, Ltd. d/b/a Academy Sports + Outdoors (Doc. No. 27) and the motion to dismiss filed by Defendant Pacesetter Personnel Services, Inc. (Doc. No. 29). These motions were filed on October 21, 2015, and October 22, 2015, respectively. Plaintiff Helen Sto

MADELINE HUGHES HAIKALA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1194In this employment action, plaintiff Robert Collier, Jr. contends that his former employer, Harland Clarke Corp., terminated his employment and retaliated against him because of his age and disability in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C.§ 621 et seq

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1391 DOROTHY E. SMITH, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Julian Jackson Smith, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SCHLAGE LOCK COMPANY, LLC, Defendant - Appellee, and AMETEK, INC., sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Haveg