Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Whittaker v. United States”
Whittaker v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Whittaker v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Whittaker v. United States Department of Justicepublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) NOEL F. WHITTAKER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 18-cv-01434 (APM) ) UNITED STATES
Whittaker v. United States Department of Justicepublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) NOEL F. WHITTAKER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 18-cv-01434 (APM) ) UNITED STATE
Whittaker v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Whittaker v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Whittaker v. United Statespublic domain
ORDER This matter is before the court upon consideration of the appellant’s response to this court’s order directing him to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction on the basis of a late notice of appeal. The appellant responded by stating that he is not knowledgeable in the law; that he has relied on the assistance and advice of other inmates; and that there have been delays as a result o
Whittaker v. United Statespublic domain
540 U.S. 985 WHITTAKERv.UNITED STATES. No. 03-458. Supreme Court of United States. November 3, 2003. 1 Appeal from the C. A. 3d Cir. 2 Certiorari denied. Reported below: 67 Fed. Ap
Whittaker v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Whittaker v. United Statespublic domain
815 F.Supp. 764 (1993) Stanley WHITTAKER v. UNITED STATES of America. Civ. No. 92-258. United States District Court, D. Vermont. March 15, 1993. Calvin J. Wier, Karen E. Wier, Boston, MA, for plaintiff. Thomas D. Anderson, Asst. U.S. Atty., Burlington, VT, for defendant. ORDER BILLINGS, District Judge. On January 22, 1993, defen
Whittaker Corporation v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION MURGUIA, Circuit Judge: When two or more people have been found liable for someone’s injury, and one of them pays more than her fair share, the law often lets the person who paid too much recover from the others, in order to even things out. This is called the right to “contribution,” and it has deep roots in our statutory and common law. See Nw. Airlines, Inc. v. Transp. Workers Union of Am.
United States v. Whittakerpublic domain
PER CURIAM: Thomas H. Dale, appointed counsel for Kirk Whittaker in this appeal from the district court’s denial of Whittaker’s motion to vacate his sentence for lack of jurisdiction, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
Whittaker v. Whittaker (In re Whittaker)public domain
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION Frank J. Bailey, United States Bankruptcy Judge By their complaint in this adversary proceeding, the three plaintiffs, all siblings of the chapter 7 debtor, seek a determination that the claims they assert against him are excepted from discharge under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A), (a)(4), and (a)(6). Their underlying claims, which remain unadjudicated, are for breaches of the defendant’
United States v. Whittakerpublic domain
PER CURIAM: Thomas H. Dale, appointed counsel for Kirk Whittaker in this appeal from the district court’s denial of Whittaker’s motion to vacate his sentence for lack of jurisdiction, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
Whittaker v. Whittakerpublic domain
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Whittaker v. Whittakerpublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia denied. Same case below, 228 W. Va. 84, 717 S.E.2d 868.
Lemus-Pineda v. Whittakerpublic domain
GEORGE B. DANIELS, United States District Judge: Petitioner Jose Eduardo Lemus-Pineda seeks immediate release from detention *474pending the resolution of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241.
Whittaker v. Mackiepublic domain
Petition for rehearing denied.
United States v. Whittakerpublic domain
BECKER, Circuit Judge, dissenting. The Government is to be congratulated on its successful prosecution of the operators of the “chop shop” known as the “Hacienda.” Similar kudos are not warranted with respect to the Government’s prosecution of Mr. Whittaker. To be sure, the evidence is clear that Whittaker was in arrears on his lease payments, and would have taken a financial “bath” had the vehicle simply been r
Whittaker v. Mackiepublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.