Cases

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs June 20, 2016 TINA DAWN GARNER v. SCOTT WHITNEY GARNER Appeal from the General Sessions Court for Hardin County No. 8763 Daniel L. Smith, Judge ___________________________________ No. W2016-01213-COA-T10B-CV – Filed August 10, 2016 _________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT JOHN R. TUNHEIM, District Judge. Plaintiff Joseph Whitney brought this action in October 2010 based upon an alleged oral agreement he made with Defendant John Morrison pursuant to which Whitney.was entitled to one-half of the shares of stock in at least twelve internet-based marketing companies. Whitney brought various common law and st

542 F.Supp.2d 908 (2008) ONEIDA TRIBE OF INDIANS OF WISCONSIN, Plaintiff, v. VILLAGE OF HOBART, WISCONSIN, Defendant. No. 06-C-1302. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. March 28, 2008. *909 Amy C. Hertel, Mary J. Streitz, Vernle C. Durocher, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Minneapolis, MN, James R. Bittorf, Rebecca M. Webster

Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge WILLIAMS. STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge: Shan Sparshott and Charles Smith were both employees of Feld Entertainment, Inc., the operator of the Ringling Bros, circus. Smith was the Chief Financial Officer, a board member, and a minority shareholder; his responsibilities included management of

527 F.Supp.2d 1072 (2007) VNUS MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff v. DIOMED HOLDINGS, INC., Diomed, Inc., Angiodynamics, Inc., and Vascular Solutions, Inc., Defendants. No. C-05-2972 MMC. United States District Court, N.D. California. October 24, 2007. Duane Daniel Bryon Nash, Matthew B. Lehr, Stephanie E. Lockwood, Chung Gyun Suh, Veronica C. Abrue, Davis Polk &

ORDER ERICKSON, United States Magistrate Judge. I. Introduction On April 11, 2002, the Court heard argument on the Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Discovery. At the time of the Hearing, the Plaintiff appeared by Peter M. Lancaster, Esq., and the Defendants appeared by Frederick W. Morris, and Timothy P. Griffin, Esqs. For reasons which follow, we grant the Plaintiffs Motion. <

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MATTHEW C. KILGORE , individually No. 09-16703 and on behalf of all others similarly situated; WILLIAM BRUCE FULLER, D.C. No. individually and on behalf of all 3:08-cv-02958- others similarly situated; TEH Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. KEYBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION , successor in interest to Keybank USA, N.A.; KEY EDUC

Opinion SEGAL, J.— INTRODUCTION Code of Civil Procedure section 340.5 1 provides that a plaintiff in an action for medical malpractice must file the action within three years of the date of injury or one year after the plaintiff discovers, or through the use of re

694 N.W.2d 585 (2005) UNITY CHURCH OF ST. PAUL, et al., Respondents, Adath Jeshurun Congregation, et al., Respondents, City of Minneapolis, Respondent, People Serving People, Inc., et al., Respondents, v. STATE of Minnesota, Appellant. No. A04-1302. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. April 12, 2005. *587 Mike Hatch, Attor

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER YOUNG, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The Plaintiff, Dawn Marie Doyle (“Doyle”), brings this action under Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Doyle seeks judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”). A. Procedural History Doyle submitt

LOUIS L. STANTON, U.S.D.J. Defendants move under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) to dismiss the first five counts in the Second Amended Complaint ("SAC") for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. For the reasons that follow, the motion is granted in part and denied in part. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") commenced th

657 S.E.2d 796 (2008) 51 Va. App. 337 Wilbert ABNEY, Jr. v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia. Record No. 1366-06-4. Court of Appeals of Virginia, Alexandria. March 4, 2008. *798 Dawn M. Butorac, Assistant Public Defender (Whitney E. Minter, Assistant Public Defender; Office of the Public Defender, on brief), for a

Cite as 2023 Ark. 67 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSION OF Opinion Delivered: April 20, 2023 ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY 2023 ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM The final deadline for attorneys to pay the 2023 annual attorney-license fee was April 17, 2023.1 As required by Rule VII(C)(9) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar, attached

Cite as 2024 Ark. 67 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSION OF Opinion Delivered April 18, 2024 ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY 2024 ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM The final deadline for attorneys to pay the 2024 annual attorney-license fee was April 15, 2024. As required by Rule VII(C)(9) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar, the clerk of

228 F.Supp.2d 999 (2002) In re 2000 SUGAR BEET CROP INSURANCE LITIGATION No. 01-CV-1629(JMRFLN). No. 01-CV-1630(PAMSRN). No. 01-CV-1632(DSDSRN). No. 01-CV-1633(ADMAJB). No. 01-CV-1634(DWFAJB). No. 01-CV-1635(DSDJGL). No. 01-CV-1636(DWFSRN). No. 01-CV-1637(PAMJGL). No. 01-CV-2242(MJDJGL). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. September 26, 2002.

763 N.W.2d 862 (2009) Katherine VARNUM, Patricia Hyde, Dawn Barbouroske, Jennifer Barbouroske, Jason Morgan, Charles Swaggerty, David Twombley, Lawrence Hoch, William M. Musser, Otter Dreaming, Ingrid Olson, and Reva Evans, Appellees, v. Timothy J. BRIEN, In His Official Capacities as the Polk County Recorder and Polk County Registrar, Appellant. No. 07-1499. Supreme Court of Iowa.

IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE ROGER S., Appellant, v. JAMES S., WHITNEY K., A.S., Appellees. No. 1 CA-JV 20-0273 FILED 6-29-2021 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County No. JD37965 The Honorab

Cite as 2021 Ark. 92 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSION OF Opinion Delivered April 22, 2021 ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY 2021 ANNUAL ATTORNEY- LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM The final deadline for attorneys to pay the 2021 annual attorney-license fee was April 15, 2021. Rule VII(C) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar imposes an automatic suspension on th

738 F.Supp.2d 267 (2010) The UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Kassie WESTMORELAND, Plaintiff, v. AMGEN, INC.; International Nephrology Network renamed Integrated Nephrology Network, a d/b/a of Dialysis Purchasing Alliance, Inc.; and ASD Healthcare, Defendants. Civil Action No. 06-10972-WGY. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. September 20, 2010.

On motion of F. Aaron Negangard, Chief Deputy Attorney General of the State of Indiana, and Cathleen M. Shrader, President of the State Board of Law Examiners, both members of the Bar of this Court, each applicant named in Exhibit A is by Order of this Court now duly sworn and admitted to practice as an attorney at law, and their respective names are ordered entered upon the Roll of Attorneys of this Court in the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Cou