Cases

OPINION AND ORDER RAMOS, District Judge. This litigation concerns a long-fought dispute over the right to contributions made pursuant to Collective Bargaining Agreements (“CBAs”). In 2006, Trustees of the Union Mutual Medical Fund (the “UMMF”) and the UMMF (cohectively, “Plaintiffs”) brought suit against individuals in their capacities as Trustees of the Teamster Local 210 Affiliated Health and

DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION McMAHON, District Judge: PRELIMINARY STATEMENT This is essentially a denial of benefits case under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) (29 U.S.C. § 1001 et. seq). It is brought by a polyglot group of unrelated plaintiffs who either (1) applied to th

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD [DKT. #38] AND REMANDING FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS VANESSA L. BRYANT, District Judge. The Plaintiff, Tiffany L. Halo (“Halo”), who at all times relevant to this proceeding was a student at Yale University and an insured under Yale Health Plan (“YHP”), brings this action pro se against the De

566 F.3d 292 (2009) NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, 1199 SEIU United Healthcare Workers, Intervenor, v. SPECIAL TOUCH HOME CARE SERVICES, INC., Respondent. Docket No. 07-5422-ag. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: November 19, 2008. Decided: May 12, 2009. *294 Amy H. Ginn, Att

07-5422-ag National Labor Relations Board v. Special Touch Home Care Services, Inc. 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 _______________ 4 5 August Term, 2008 6 7 (Argued: November 19, 2008 Decided: May 12, 2009) 8 9 Docket No. 07-5422-ag 10 ________

88 N.Y.2d 628 (1996) 672 N.E.2d 135 649 N.Y.S.2d 115 Peggy Juarez, an Infant, by Her Mother and Natural Guardian, Noemi Juarez, et al., Respondents, v. Wavecrest Management Team Ltd., Defendant, and Mayaghor Realty, Inc., Appellant. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Argued April 24, 1996. Decided July 2, 1996.

262 F.Supp.2d 163 (2003) Rasheed WILDS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Rafael Deleon a/k/a Ralph Deleon, Christopher Wheeler, "John Doe, I", ""John Doe, II", John Doe, HI", "John Doe, IV", "Jane Doe, I", "Jane Doe, II", "Jane Doe, III", "Jane Doe, IV", "Jane Doe, V", and "Jane Doe, VI", the persons intended being employees and/or supervisors of United Parcel Service, Inc., but whose true names are presently unknown to plaintiff, Defen

777 F.Supp. 330 (1991) IMPERIAL CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES, PLC, Plaintiff, v. DANBURY PHARMACAL, INC., Defendant. Civ. A. Nos. 89-575-CMW, 90-736-CMW. United States District Court, D. Delaware. November 4, 1991. *331 *332 Douglas E. Whitney, Donald F. Parsons, Jr., and Jack B. Blumenfeld of Morris,

486 F.Supp. 504 (1980) Ralph LIGHTFOOT et al., Plaintiffs, v. Daniel WALKER et al., Defendants. Civ. Nos. 73-238E, 78-2095. United States District Court, S. D. Illinois. February 19, 1980. As Amended March 18, 1980. *505 Harvey Grossman, Land of Lincoln Legal Assistance Foundation, Inc., East St. Louis, Ill., Pat

611 F.Supp. 1498 (1985) MEDTRONIC, INC. and Medtronic Puerto Rico, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. DAIG CORPORATION, Defendant. PACESETTER SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. MEDTRONIC, INC. and Medtronic Puerto Rico, Inc., Defendants. Civ. Nos. 4-79-256, 3-83-251. United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Third and Fourth Divisions. June 24, 1985.