⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Whitehead v. Universal Pictures”

District Court, District of Columbia · 2001-02-23 · Published · cited 6× · 145 F. Supp. 2d 3; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3078; 2001 WL 286737
145 F.Supp.2d 3 (2001) David L. WHITEHEAD, Plaintiff, v. PARAMOUNT PICTURES CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 96-2436(PFL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. February 23, 2001. Daniel J. Henry, Falls Church, VA, for Plaintiff. Gerson Avery Zweifach, Paul Benedict Gaffney, Williams & Connolly, Washington, DC, for Paramount Pictu
District Court, District of Columbia · 1999-06-30 · Published · cited 19× · 53 F. Supp. 2d 38; 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10083; 1999 WL 450794
53 F.Supp.2d 38 (1999) David L. WHITEHEAD, Plaintiff, v. PARAMOUNT PICTURES CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. No. Civ.A. 96-2436(PLF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 30, 1999. *39 *40 Daniel Joseph Henry, Falls Church, VA, for plaintiff. Gerson Avery Zweifach, P
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011-05-24 · Published · cited 46× · 647 F.3d 120; 2011 WL 1998333
GREGORY, Circuit Judge, dissenting: While I agree that the rules of preclusion are, in this case, not applicable to the administrative courts, I believe that the Board of Immigration Appeals’ interpretation of the phrase “legal separation” in 8 U.S.C. § 1432(a)(3) violates the equal protection guarantee of the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause. Therefore, I respectfully dissent. The major
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2021-10-25 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 18-1538V (to be published) ************************* DURENDA WHITEHEAD * and * KEYNARD SHAWTELL JOHNSON, SR., * Filed: September 29, 2021 on behalf of KSJ, JR., *
District Court, District of Columbia · 2010-03-29 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________________ ) ROBERT R. PRUNTÉ, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 06-0480 (PLF)
District Court, District of Columbia · 2008-06-02 · Published · cited 3× · 563 F. Supp. 2d 41; 87 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1542; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42872; 2008 WL 2232624
563 F.Supp.2d 41 (2008) Robert R. PRUNTÉ, Plaintiff, v. UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 06-0480 (PLF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 2, 2008. *42 Robert R. Prunté, Baltimore, MD, pro se. Michael Brian Desanctis, Jenner & Block LLP, Washington, DC, for Universal Mus
District Court, District of Columbia · 2004-02-11 · Published · cited 10× · 315 F. Supp. 2d 1; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6184; 2004 WL 895883
315 F.Supp.2d 1 (2004) David L. WHITEHEAD, Plaintiff, v. CBS/VIACOM, INC., et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A.01-1192(RWR). United States District Court, District of Columbia. February 11, 2004. *2 *3 David L. Whitehead, pro se. Paul R. Taskier, Dickstein, Shapiro, Morin & Oshinsky, L.L.
District Court, District of Columbia · 2010-03-29 · Published · cited 28× · 699 F. Supp. 2d 15; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29746; 2010 WL 1174209
699 F.Supp.2d 15 (2010) Robert R. PRUNTE, Plaintiff, v. UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 06-0480 (PLF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 29, 2010. *18 Robert R. Prunte, Rex Village, GA, pro se. Michael Brian Desanctis, Jenner & Block LLP, Washington, DC, for Def
District Court, District of Columbia · 2007-03-30 · Published · cited 54× · 484 F. Supp. 2d 32; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22865; 2007 WL 945401
484 F.Supp.2d 32 (2007) Robert R. PRUNTÉ, and Yoworld Music Company, Plaintiffs, v. UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 06-0480(PLF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 30, 2007. *33 *34 *35 Robert R. Pruntée,
District Court, District of Columbia · 2008-03-20 · Published · cited 5× · 539 F. Supp. 2d 191; 86 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1012; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22162; 2008 WL 740567
539 F.Supp.2d 191 (2008) Janice SCOTT-BLANTON, Plaintiff, v. UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS PRODUCTIONS LLLP et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 07-0098 (RMU). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 20, 2008. *192 Janice Scott-Blanton, Triangle, VA, pro se. Steven Jonathan Metalitz, Mitchell Silberberg & Kn
District Court, District of Columbia · 2007-07-19 · Published · cited 2× · 495 F. Supp. 2d 74; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51900; 2007 WL 2059117
495 F.Supp.2d 74 (2007) Janice SCOTT-BLANTON pro se, Plaintiff, v. UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS PRODUCTIONS LLLP et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 07-0098(RMU). United States District Court, District of Columbia. July 19, 2007. *75 *76 Janice Scott-Blanton, Triangle, VA, Pro se. Steven Jon
State v. Whiteheadpublic domain
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978-05-10 · Published · cited 7× · 388 A.2d 280; 159 N.J. Super. 433
159 N.J. Super. 433 (1978) 388 A.2d 280 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF, v. MICHAEL WHITEHEAD, DEFENDANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division. Decided May 10, 1978. *434 Mr. Leonard D. Ronco, Special Deputy Attorney in Charge, attorney for plaintiff, by Elaine Zamula, Special Deputy Attorney General.
Missouri Court of Appeals · 1959-10-20 · Published · cited 0× · 328 S.W.2d 170; 1959 Mo. App. LEXIS 463
RUDDY, Judge. This is an action for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff when his clothes were ignited by a fire where he was employed. Defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff. While plaintiff has pleaded five specifications of negligence, only one was submitted to the jury by the court. The negligence submitted was the failure of the defendant to provide a reasonably safe and workable fi
California Court of Appeal · 1969-01-22 · Published · cited 7× · 269 Cal. App. 2d 31; 74 Cal. Rptr. 499; 161 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 316; 1969 Cal. App. LEXIS 1613
269 Cal.App.2d 31 (1969) GORDON GORDON et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. WARNER BROS. PICTURES, INC., Defendant and Appellant. Civ. No. 31852. California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Three. Jan. 22, 1969. Wyman, Bautzer, Finell & Rothman, Mitchell, Silberberg & Knupp, Ralph E. Lewis, Charles A. Collier and Charles L. Fonarow for Defendant an
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1963-04-09 · Published · cited 41× · 151 So. 2d 705; 1963 La. App. LEXIS 1496
151 So.2d 705 (1963) UNIVERSAL C. I. T. CREDIT CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Henry HULETT et ux., Defendants-Appellees. No. 810. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. April 9, 1963. *706 William C. Boone, Leesville, for plaintiff-appellant. Wm. C. Pegues, III, DeRidder, for defendants-appellees. Before
Supreme Court of Virginia · 1950-11-27 · Published · cited 40× · 191 Va. 525; 62 S.E.2d 233; 1950 Va. LEXIS 240
191 Va. 525 (1950) E. I. DUPONT DENEMOURS & COMPANY v. UNIVERSAL MOULDED PRODUCTS CORPORATION. Record No. 3663. Supreme Court of Virginia. November 27, 1950. Stant & Roberts, Abel Klaw, Woods, Rogers, Muse & Walker and W. Breckenridge De Riemer, for the plaintiff in error. Jones, Woodward & Miles, Reed, Crane & McGovern and
Dubay v. Kingpublic domain
District Court, M.D. Florida · 2019-02-28 · Published · cited 0× · 366 F. Supp. 3d 1330
HARVEY E. SCHLESINGER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1333THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendants' Dispositive Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum of Law in Support (Doc. 115) and Plaintiff's Response and Memorandum of Law in Opposition thereto (Doc. 120). After careful consideration of the issues presented, Defen
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017-02-28 · Published · cited 2× · 71 N.E.3d 856; 2017 WL 765903; 2017 Ind. App. LEXIS 91
Barnes, Judge. Case Summary Neil Albee appeals his convictions for Level 6 felony voyeurism and Class B misdemeanor residential entry. We reverse. Issues Albee raises two issues, which we restate as: I. whether the trial court abused its discretion by admitting into evide
Bergus v. Florianpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2024-10-22 · Published · cited 2× · 120 F.4th 14
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 23-1458, 23-1884 BORIS O. BERGUS, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. AGUSTIN M. FLORIAN, Defendant, Appellant. APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Douglas P. Woodlock, U.S. District Judge]
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2021-06-14 · Published · cited 0×
06/14/2021 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 31, 2021 JEFFERY COMBS v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Sullivan County No. C66727 James F. Goodwin, Jr., Judge ___________________________________