Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Whitehead v. Universal Pictures”
Whitehead v. Paramount Pictures Corp.public domain
145 F.Supp.2d 3 (2001) David L. WHITEHEAD, Plaintiff, v. PARAMOUNT PICTURES CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 96-2436(PFL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. February 23, 2001. Daniel J. Henry, Falls Church, VA, for Plaintiff. Gerson Avery Zweifach, Paul Benedict Gaffney, Williams & Connolly, Washington, DC, for Paramount Pictu
Whitehead v. Paramount Pictures Corp.public domain
53 F.Supp.2d 38 (1999) David L. WHITEHEAD, Plaintiff, v. PARAMOUNT PICTURES CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. No. Civ.A. 96-2436(PLF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 30, 1999. *39 *40 Daniel Joseph Henry, Falls Church, VA, for plaintiff. Gerson Avery Zweifach, P
Johnson v. Whiteheadpublic domain
GREGORY, Circuit Judge, dissenting: While I agree that the rules of preclusion are, in this case, not applicable to the administrative courts, I believe that the Board of Immigration Appeals’ interpretation of the phrase “legal separation” in 8 U.S.C. § 1432(a)(3) violates the equal protection guarantee of the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause. Therefore, I respectfully dissent. The major
Whitehead v. Secretary of Health and Human Servicespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 18-1538V (to be published) ************************* DURENDA WHITEHEAD * and * KEYNARD SHAWTELL JOHNSON, SR., * Filed: September 29, 2021 on behalf of KSJ, JR., *
Prunte' v. Universal Music Group, Inc.public domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________________ ) ROBERT R. PRUNTÉ, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 06-0480 (PLF)
Prunté v. Universal Music Grouppublic domain
563 F.Supp.2d 41 (2008) Robert R. PRUNTÉ, Plaintiff, v. UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 06-0480 (PLF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 2, 2008. *42 Robert R. Prunté, Baltimore, MD, pro se. Michael Brian Desanctis, Jenner & Block LLP, Washington, DC, for Universal Mus
Whitehead v. CBS/Viacom, Inc.public domain
315 F.Supp.2d 1 (2004) David L. WHITEHEAD, Plaintiff, v. CBS/VIACOM, INC., et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A.01-1192(RWR). United States District Court, District of Columbia. February 11, 2004. *2 *3 David L. Whitehead, pro se. Paul R. Taskier, Dickstein, Shapiro, Morin & Oshinsky, L.L.
Prunte v. Universal Music Group, Inc.public domain
699 F.Supp.2d 15 (2010) Robert R. PRUNTE, Plaintiff, v. UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 06-0480 (PLF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 29, 2010. *18 Robert R. Prunte, Rex Village, GA, pro se. Michael Brian Desanctis, Jenner & Block LLP, Washington, DC, for Def
Prunte v. Universal Music Grouppublic domain
484 F.Supp.2d 32 (2007) Robert R. PRUNTÉ, and Yoworld Music Company, Plaintiffs, v. UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 06-0480(PLF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 30, 2007. *33 *34 *35 Robert R. Pruntée,
539 F.Supp.2d 191 (2008) Janice SCOTT-BLANTON, Plaintiff, v. UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS PRODUCTIONS LLLP et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 07-0098 (RMU). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 20, 2008. *192 Janice Scott-Blanton, Triangle, VA, pro se. Steven Jonathan Metalitz, Mitchell Silberberg & Kn
495 F.Supp.2d 74 (2007) Janice SCOTT-BLANTON pro se, Plaintiff, v. UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS PRODUCTIONS LLLP et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 07-0098(RMU). United States District Court, District of Columbia. July 19, 2007. *75 *76 Janice Scott-Blanton, Triangle, VA, Pro se. Steven Jon
State v. Whiteheadpublic domain
159 N.J. Super. 433 (1978) 388 A.2d 280 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF, v. MICHAEL WHITEHEAD, DEFENDANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division. Decided May 10, 1978. *434 Mr. Leonard D. Ronco, Special Deputy Attorney in Charge, attorney for plaintiff, by Elaine Zamula, Special Deputy Attorney General.
Whitehead v. Schrickpublic domain
RUDDY, Judge. This is an action for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff when his clothes were ignited by a fire where he was employed. Defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff. While plaintiff has pleaded five specifications of negligence, only one was submitted to the jury by the court. The negligence submitted was the failure of the defendant to provide a reasonably safe and workable fi
Gordon v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.public domain
269 Cal.App.2d 31 (1969) GORDON GORDON et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. WARNER BROS. PICTURES, INC., Defendant and Appellant. Civ. No. 31852. California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Three. Jan. 22, 1969. Wyman, Bautzer, Finell & Rothman, Mitchell, Silberberg & Knupp, Ralph E. Lewis, Charles A. Collier and Charles L. Fonarow for Defendant an
Universal CIT Credit Corporation v. Hulettpublic domain
151 So.2d 705 (1963) UNIVERSAL C. I. T. CREDIT CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Henry HULETT et ux., Defendants-Appellees. No. 810. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. April 9, 1963. *706 William C. Boone, Leesville, for plaintiff-appellant. Wm. C. Pegues, III, DeRidder, for defendants-appellees. Before
191 Va. 525 (1950) E. I. DUPONT DENEMOURS & COMPANY v. UNIVERSAL MOULDED PRODUCTS CORPORATION. Record No. 3663. Supreme Court of Virginia. November 27, 1950. Stant & Roberts, Abel Klaw, Woods, Rogers, Muse & Walker and W. Breckenridge De Riemer, for the plaintiff in error. Jones, Woodward & Miles, Reed, Crane & McGovern and
Dubay v. Kingpublic domain
HARVEY E. SCHLESINGER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1333THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendants' Dispositive Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum of Law in Support (Doc. 115) and Plaintiff's Response and Memorandum of Law in Opposition thereto (Doc. 120). After careful consideration of the issues presented, Defen
Neil C. Albee v. State of Indianapublic domain
Barnes, Judge. Case Summary Neil Albee appeals his convictions for Level 6 felony voyeurism and Class B misdemeanor residential entry. We reverse. Issues Albee raises two issues, which we restate as: I. whether the trial court abused its discretion by admitting into evide
Bergus v. Florianpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 23-1458, 23-1884 BORIS O. BERGUS, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. AGUSTIN M. FLORIAN, Defendant, Appellant. APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Douglas P. Woodlock, U.S. District Judge]
Jeffery Combs v. State of Tennesseepublic domain
06/14/2021 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 31, 2021 JEFFERY COMBS v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Sullivan County No. C66727 James F. Goodwin, Jr., Judge ___________________________________