Cases

FLOYD, Circuit Judge: *253The Constitution entrusts the President and Congress, not the courts, with the power to resolve political questions. See Japan Whaling Ass'n v. Am. Cetacean Soc'y , 478 U.S. 221, 230, <

709 F.2d 1109 36 UCC Rep.Serv. 14, 14 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1705 BINKS MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Plaintiff-Counterdefendant-Appellee,v.NATIONAL PRESTO INDUSTRIES, INC. and Presto ManufacturingCompany, Defendants- Counterplaintiffs-Appellants. No. 82-1609. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. Argued Nov. 29, 1982.Decided

COFFEY, Circuit Judge. a contractual dispute concerning the manufacture and sale of an “industrial spray finishing and baking system.” Binks Manufacturing Company, the System’s manufacturer, brought an action in federal district court to collect the purchase price of the System. Presto Manufacturing Company,1 counterclaimed alleging damages resulting from defective design and manufacture of the

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1960 In re: KBR, INC., Burn Pit Litigation. ------------------------------ ALAN METZGAR, RWT 09-744; PAUL PARKER, and all others similarly situated: RWT 09-744; JOSHUA ELLER, RWT 09-2748; JOANNE OCHS, RWT 09-2747; MELISSA OCHS, RWT 09-2747; JAMES MORGAN, RWT 09-2747; DAVID NEWTON, RWT

608 F.Supp.2d 1166 (2009) SUN MICROSYSTEMS INC., Plaintiff, v. HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC., et al., Defendants. No. C 06-1665 PJH. United States District Court, N.D. California. March 31, 2009. *1169 Christine Elaine Cwiertny, Daniel Allen Sasse, Theresa C. Lopez, Crowell & Moring LLP, Irvine, CA, David Daniel Cross, Jerome A. M

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant FedEx Ground Packages System, Ine.’s Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of the Accident Register Report and Other Accidents, filed November 16, 2015 (Doc. 65)(“Register Motion”). The Court held a hearing on December 22, 2015. The primary issues are whether the Court sho

630 F.Supp.2d 635 (2008) PRECISION COMPONENTS, INC., Plaintiff, v. C.W. BEARING USA, INC., Defendant. Civil Case No. 3:06cv259. United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division. December 16, 2008. *636 Donald Mitchell Brown, Jr., J. Scott Hampton, Brown & Associates, PLLC, James M. Harrington, The Harring

594 F.Supp.2d 259 (2009) Doukas P. SIOTKAS, Plaintiff, v. LABONE, INC., Michael Peat, and Alan Davis, Defendants. Caroline J. Van Heule, Plaintiff, v. LabOne, Inc., Michael Peat, and Alan Davis, Defendants. Nos. 01-CV-6242 (SMG), 01-CV-6243 (SMG). United States District Court, E.D. New York. January 6, 2009. *262 Davi

OPINION Petitioners seek a writ of prohibition preventing Respondent, the Kayenta District Court, from exercising jurisdiction over claims in negligence filed against Petitioners arising from a motor vehicle accident occurring within the Navajo Nation on U.S. Highway 160 west of the Township of Kayenta, Arizona. Petitioners are nonmembers of the Navajo Nation. Fatalities resulting from the accident were a Navajo man and unbo

791 F.Supp.2d 1026 (2011) GUIDANCE ENDODONTICS, LLC, a New Mexico Limited Liability Company, Plaintiff, v. DENTSPLY INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Delaware Business Corporation, and Tulsa Dental Products, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, Defendants, and Dentsply International, Inc. and Tulsa Dental Products, LLC, Counter Plaintiffs, v. Guidance Endodontics, LLC and Dr. Charles Goodis, Counter Defendants. No. CI

RULING RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND APPOINTMENT OF CLASS COUNSEL (DOC. NO. 121) JANET C. HALL, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION.........................................................287 II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND................................................288 III. STANDARD OF REVIEW............................

41 F.Supp.2d 274 (1998) IVOCLAR NORTH AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff, v. DENTSPLY INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant. No. 98 Civ. 3812(RLC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. December 21, 1998. *275 *276 Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein, New York City, Neil M. Zipkin, Denise A. Lindenauer, o

50 B.R. 885 (1985) In re The WHITE MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION, White Motor Corporation, Gemini Manufacturing Co., Debtors. Bankruptcy Nos. B80-3360 to B80-3362. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio, E.D. June 24, 1985. *886 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WILLIAM J. O'NEILL, Bankruptcy Judge. On September 4, 1980, White

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed October 29, 2025. ________________ No. 3D21-2214 Lower Tribunal No. 17-18509 ________________ Philip Morris USA Inc., Appellant, vs. Michael Jordan Lipp, etc.,

714 F.Supp.2d 598 (2010) NEVADA PARTNERS FUND, LLC, by and through SAPPHIRE II, INC., the tax matters partner, Plaintiff v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Civil Action No. 3:06cv379-HTW-MTP. Nos. 3:06-cv-384 HTW-MTP, 3:06-cv-385 HTW-MTP, 3:06-cv-386 HTW-MTP, 3:06-cv-387 HTW-MTP, 3:06-cv-380 HTW-MTP, 3:06-cv-381 HTW-MTP, 3:06-cv-382 HTW-MTP, 3:06-cv-388 HTW-MTP, 3:06-cv-389 HTW-MTP, 3:06-cv-390 HTW-MTP.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PREGERSON, District Judge. Plamtiff/Counterclaim Defendant JOHN CHARLES DESIGNS, INC.’s (“JCD”) Motion for Summary Judgment of Patent Infringement and Patent Validity and Defendant/Counterclaimant QUEEN INTERNATIONAL DESIGN, INC.’s (“QUEEN”) Cross Motion for Summary Judgment came before the Court on September 23, 1996. After consideration of the parti

DAVID T. PROSSER, J. ¶ 1. In 1980 Congress adopted the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), popularly known as "Superfund," to promote the cleanup of haz*70ardous waste. The Act empowered the federal government, through the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), to identify hazardous waste sites and pursue remedial activities. As p

835 S.W.2d 411 (1992) Stella HULSHOF and Robert Hulshof, Appellants-Respondents v. NORANDA ALUMINUM, INC., a corporation, Respondent-Appellant. Nos. 17628, 17684. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division One. June 3, 1992. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied June 25, 1992. Application to Transfer Denied September 22, 1992.

987 F.Supp. 353 (1997) GOULD, INC., Plaintiff, v. A & M BATTERY & TIRE SERVICE, et. al., Defendants. No. Civ. 3:CV-91-1714. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. September 4, 1997. *354 *355 John M. Armstrong, Schnader, Harrison Segal & Lewis, Cherry Hill, NJ, Dennis R.

246 Kan. 336 (1990) 789 P.2d 541 DOUGLAS SAMSEL, Plaintiff, v. WHEELER TRANSPORT SERVICES, INC., DON C. HILGENFELD, and GREAT WEST CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendants. No. 62,983 Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed March 21, 1990. Jerry R. Palmer, of Palmer, Marquardt & Snyder, P.A., of Topeka, argued the cause and was on the briefs fo