Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “White v. Stephens”
White v. Stephenspublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
White v. Stephenspublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Walter Duane White, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2010) petition for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and the court’s order denying reconsideration. We have re
White Ex Rel. Estate of White v. Stephenspublic domain
300 S.C. 241 (1990) 387 S.E.2d 260 Sam B. WHITE, Molly White Welter, and Ann F. White as Executrix of the Estate of Jesse A. White, Jr., Respondents v. Corinne H. STEPHENS, Appellant. 23126 Supreme Court of South Carolina. Submitted September 20, 1989. Decided January 2, 1990. *242 Char
White v. Stephens (In Re Stephens)public domain
43 B.R. 97 (1984) In re Kay Shelton STEPHENS d/b/a Sumter Flowers, Debtor. J. William WHITE, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Kay Shelton STEPHENS and Ball Seed Company, Inc. Bankruptcy No. BK83-6342, Adv. No. AP84-0182. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama, W.D. October 4, 1984. J. William White, Scottsboro, Ala., Trustee. Edward H. Pradat, Tuscaloosa, Ala
White v. Whitepublic domain
PER CURIAM. Former wife appeals the trial court’s order denying her motion to enter final judgment for money due and overruling her exceptions to the trial court’s findings regarding the final judgment for the dissolution of marriage. We affirm, without discussion, the trial court’s order denying the former wife’s request for prejudgment interest and attorney’s fees, but reverse the trial court’s order requiring the former wif
SOTTER v. Stephenspublic domain
727 S.E.2d 484 (2012) 291 Ga. 79 SOTTER v. STEPHENS. White et al. v. Stephens. Nos. S12A0519, S12A0520. Supreme Court of Georgia. May 7, 2012. *486 Russell David Willard, Senior Asst. Atty. Gen., Samuel S. Olens, Atty. Gen., Stefan Ernst Ritter, Senior Asst. Atty. Gen., Dennis R. Dunn, Deputy A
Stephens v. CSX Transportation, Inc.public domain
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Willie Homer Stephens, Guardian ad Litem for Lillian C., a minor, Petitioner, v. CSX Transportation, Inc. and South Carolina Department of Transportation, Respondents. Appellate Case No. 2013-000133 ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS Appeal From Hampton County Carmen T. Mullen, Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 27587
White v. Statepublic domain
Johnson, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part: I agree with the majority's determination that the 2016 amendments to K.S.A. 60-1507 do not apply retroactively and that the Vontress test applies in this case. But I do not find that holding to be critical to this case, because, in my view, the defendant meets either test. Consequently, I agree that the rulings of the Court of Appe
White v. Chasepublic domain
TIMOTHY S. HILLMAN, DISTRICT JUDGE Introduction The Plaintiffs, Eugene J. White (White) and Shawn M. Roy (Roy), on behalf on themselves and other similarly situated employees of Framingham Ford Pension Plan (Plan), were participants in Framingham's *247company-wide pension fund ("The Fund"). The Fund was admini
Malcolm White v. Soudabeh Whitepublic domain
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge MOTZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge NIEMEYER and Judge KEENAN joined. *302 OPINION DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge: In April 2011, Soudabeh White left Switzerland for the United States with her minor son, who had pr
Stephens v. CSX Transportation, Inc.public domain
SHORT, J. I concur with the majority regarding the trial court’s exclusion of subsequent remedial acts. I also concur with the majority’s finding that Stephens failed to preserve the issues regarding the trial court’s denial of her motions for directed verdict and JNOV. However, I respectfully disagree with the majority regarding the alleged erroneous jury charges, and I would reverse and remand for a new trial.
State v. Hill-Whitepublic domain
REISNER, P.J.A.D. *6Defendant Gerald Hill-White appeals from his convictions for ten counts of second-degree aggravated arson, N.J.S.A. 2C:17-1(a)(1) ; one count of third-degree arson, N.J.S.A. 2C:17-1(b)(1) ; and one count of second-degree burglary, N.J.S.A. 2C:18-2.2 He
Cantrell v. Whitepublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER THOMAS W. THRASH, JR., United States District Judge This is a civil rights action. It is before the Court on the Defendant Wesley White’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 102] and the Defendant the City of College Park’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 103]. For the reasons set forth below, the Defendant Wesley White’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 102] is DENIED and the Defend
White v. Owenspublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Kenneth A. White, a federal inmate, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012), White’s second amended complaint filed in his civil action. We have reviewed the record
White v. Clementpublic domain
*185 DECISION AND ORDER DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, Dequana White, appearing pro se, commenced this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff, an inmate in the custody of the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (“DOCCS”), alleges that defendants violated
Weil v. Whitepublic domain
MEMORANDUM MATTHEW W. BRANN, District Judge. . Before the Court is the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 52) on Plaintiffs Amended Complaint (ECF No. 2). Plaintiff, a former Physician Assistant Program student at Lock Haven University, filed this civil rights action alleging unconstitutional retaliation for his lawful exercise of free speech rights protected by the First Amendment to the Un
White v. Tenet Healthsystempublic domain
ORDER PER CURIAM The plaintiff, Charles White, individually and as plaintiff ad litem for the late Charlotte White, appeals the dismissal by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis of his action for wrongful death resulting from medical malpractice against the defendants, Saint Louis University, Dr. Roshani Desai, Dr. Laurie Byrne, and Tenet Healthsystem, SL, Inc. d/b/a St. L
White v. Howardpublic domain
NAHMIAS, Justice. Appellant George White (Husband) and appellee Vanessa Howard (Wife) were married in 1972 and divorced in April 2007. Among other things, the final divorce decree: (1) required Husband to obtain a term life insurance policy in the amount of $100,000, naming Wife as the beneficiary, and to keep the policy in effect for 12 years; (2) awarded Wife half of Husband’s
United States v. Whitepublic domain
PER CURIAM: Stephan J. Langs, appointed counsel with the Federal Public Defender’s Office for Abraham White in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that Langs’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is
Stephens v. Omni Insurancepublic domain
¶1 At issue here is a credit collection agency’s practice of sending aggressive notices on behalf of insurance companies in an attempt to recover subrogation interests from uninsured drivers. In each of these linked cases, notices styled as “formal collection notices” demanded immediate payment of an “amount due.” We conclude the notices are deceptive and hold that the practice of sending them violates the Consumer Protection Act, chapter 19.86 RCW.