Cases

White, J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Delaware County (Estes, J.), rendered September 9, 1996, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of arson in the third degree and arson in the fourth degree. When this matter was originally before us, we modified defendant’s sentence by reducing the prison term imposed for the crime of arson in the third degree from 5 to 10 years to a term

301 N.W.2d 96 (1981) 207 Neb. 746 STATE of Nebraska, Appellee. v. Kenneth D. HITT, Appellant. No. 43084. Supreme Court of Nebraska. January 23, 1981. *98 Thomas M. Kenney, Douglas County Public Defender, and Stanley A. Krieger, Asst. Public Defender, Omaha, for appellant. Paul L. Douglas, Atty. Gen.

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA FILED December 23, 2024 CYNTHIA WHITE, ASHLEY N. DEEM, CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK Respondent Below, Petitioner INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

312 N.W.2d 297 (1981) 209 Neb. 900 In re Interest of Kenny Eugene and Randy Alan HITT, children under 18 years of age. STATE of Nebraska, Appellee, v. Joy Della HITT, Appellant. No. 44122. Supreme Court of Nebraska. November 6, 1981. *298 Roger R. Holthaus, Omaha, for appellant. Donald L. Knowle

EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, Circuit Judge: Scott Hitt and William Causey appeal their convictions for violating the Mann Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2422-23, raising various points of error. For the following reasons, we affirm both Hitt’s conviction and Cau-sey’s conviction. I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS Scott Hitt and William Causey were indicted on t

OPINION COOPER, Justice: Florine Magness brought this action against the Lebanon Road Apartments and B. Hitt Electric Company to recover damages for personal injuries and property loss resulting from a fire in the apartment complex where she made her residence. Plaintiff contended the fire was caused by an *45electrical arc in a panel switch-box instal

J. P. MORGAN, Special Judge. Plaintiff failed to prevail in her action to quiet title to certain lots in Pleasant Hill, Missouri, which were originally owned by her great-grandfather, John T. Russell, and she bases her present appeal on the assertion the trial court erred in construing his “will and codicil” which all parties agree was determinative of the title action. In 1885 when John T. Russell execut

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Delaware County (Estes, J.), rendered September 9, 1996, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of arson in the third degree and arson in the fourth degree. Defendant pleaded guilty to the crimes of arson in the third degree and arson in the fourth degree in full satisfaction of two outstanding indictments and received concurrent prison sentences of 5 to 10 years and IV3 t

OPINION BREWSTER, District Judge. The plaintiff seeks recovery of $107.94 excise tax paid by him in connection with the import of a Volkswagen automobile from Holland in the second quarter of 1966. All requirements for the maintenance of a suit of this type have been met, and the Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1346(a) (1). The ultimate question for decis

193 F.Supp.2d 88 (2002) MANGANARO CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. HITT CONTRACTING, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 00-401 (JMF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. January 22, 2002. *89 Sharon K. Engelhard, Howard Gary Goldberg, Goldberg, Pike & Besche, P.C., Baltimore, MD, for Plaintiff. Joel S. Rubinst

872 S.W.2d 121 (1994) Paul HITT and Bonnie Gay Hitt, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Richard MARTIN, Defendant-Respondent. No. 64248. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One. March 1, 1994. *122 Richey, Rice, Spaeth, Heisserer & Summers, Joseph P. Rice, Cape Girardeau, for plaintiffs-appellants. V. Kenneth

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-17-00504-CR Troy Anthony White, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY NO. CR2015-189, THE HONORABLE DIB WALDRIP, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION A jury fo

PRENTICE, Justice. Following a trial by jury, Defendant (Appellant) was convicted of murder, Ind.Code § 85-42-1-1 (Burns 1979) and was sentenced to sixty (60) years imprisonment. His direct appeal presents six (6) issues for our review, as follows: (1) Whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain the conviction; (2) Whether the trial court erred in denying a motion for mistrial predi

OPINION BUTTS, Justice. Defendants1 appeal from a permanent injunction enjoining them from (1) conducting informal meetings or telephone conferences to discuss public business or public policy with regard to the San Antonio Independent School District in violation of the Texas Open Meetings Act, Texas Rev.Civ. Stat.Ann. art. 6252-17 (Vernon Supp.1985),2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : : Criminal Action No.: 24-406 (RC) v. : : Re Document Nos.: 24, 25, 29, 38, TRAYON WHITE, SR., : 39, 40, 41, 42, 44

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-05-00552-CR Kenyard White, Appellant v.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-05-00552-CR Kenyard White, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 147TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 3041343, HONORABLE FRED A. MOORE, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a decree of the equity court overruling the demurrer of Roosevelt White and Jim Thomson (appellants) to the bill of complaint filed by the State of Alabama by J. Monroe Ward, Circuit Solicitor for the Circuit Court of Tuscaloosa County, Alabama. The bill was filed against Roosevelt White and Jim Thomson, alleged residents of Tuscaloosa County, Alabama, under Chapter 46, Article IV, Code of 1940, Title 14, embracing §§ 283 to 292, inclusive, and seeks to condemn

Mr. Chief Justice Shepard delivered the opinion of the Court: The first assignment of error is that the original order committing the appellant to the hospital for the insane did not constitute a lawful commitment under due process of law, and that the provisions of the Code relating thereto are unconstitutional. Sec. 927 [31 Stat. at L. 1340, chap. 854] provides for an inquiry into the sanity of an accused per

No petition for Certiorari was filed. This bill was filed to collect from the trustee $236.12, balance of the proceeds of sale of a house and lot in Tullahoma under a foreclosure of the deed of trust, claimed to be exempt under the homestead laws, which proceeds were sought to be impounded by Ewin Coop a creditor in a garnishment proceeding. The creditor Coop filed an answer and cross-bill denying that complainant was the head of a family and entitled to the pro