Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
11 opinions for “Whitaker v. Omni Federal Credit Union”
Sikhs for Justice v. Nathpublic domain
OPINION SWEET, District Judge. Defendant Kamal Nath (“Nath” or the “Defendant”) has moved pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(5) to dismiss the First Amended Complaint of plaintiffs Sikhs for Justice and seven individuals (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”) alleging violations of the Alien Tort Claims Act (“ATCA”) and the Torture Victim Protection Act (“TVPA”).
Robb v. Vilsackpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) FAHRAN ROBB, ) ) Case No. 21-cv-2056 (JDB/GMH) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) BROOKE ROLLINS, Secr
Skrodzki v. Marcellopublic domain
810 F.Supp.2d 501 (2011) Ireneusz SKRODZKI, Plaintiff, v. Walt MARCELLO, Mitchell Crane Service Inc., and Mitchell Companies, LLC, Defendants. No. 10-CV-5191 (ADS)(WDW). United States District Court, E.D. New York. August 19, 2011. *504 Roman Leonov, Esq., New York, NY, for the Plaintiff. POHL LLP, by David M. Pohl, Esq.,
A.W.L.I. Group, Inc. v. Amber Freight Shipping Linespublic domain
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. The Plaintiff in this case, A.W.L.I. Group, Inc. (“AWLI” or “the Plaintiff’) filed a complaint against the Defendant, Amber Freight Shipping Lines (“AFSL” or “the Defendant”) for alleged trademark infringement, false designation of origin, dilution, unfair competition and deceptive trade practices. For the reasons set forth below,
Garcia v. Chrysler Group LLCpublic domain
OPINION & ORDER KATHERINE B. FORREST, District Judge: Defendant FCA U.S. LLC, more commonly known as “Chrysler,” manufactures vehicles that have a key component known as the “Totally Integrated Power Module,” or “TIPM.” The TIPM functions as *216a vehicle’s electronic nerve center, and it is responsible for controlling and distributi
Sikhs for Justice v. Nathpublic domain
OPINION SWEET, District Judge. Currently before the Court are several motions and a cross-motion filed by the parties to this action. The plaintiffs Sikhs for Justice and seven individuals (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”) moved pursuant to Rules 54(a), 59(e) and 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Proce*603dure and Lo
470 F.Supp.2d 345 (2007) INTERNATIONAL HEALTHCARE EXCHANGE, INC., d/b/a Global Healthcare Exchange and Kristin M. Cuene, Plaintiffs, v. GLOBAL HEALTHCARE EXCHANGE, LLC, Abbott Laboratories, Baxter International, Inc., General Electric Company, Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, Inc., Gene Dorff, John F. Gaither, Jr., and Patrick Egan, Defendants. No. 02 Civ. 7862(LTS). United States District Court, S.D.
Procter & Gamble Co. v. Bankers Trust Co.public domain
925 F.Supp. 1270 (1996) The PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. BANKERS TRUST COMPANY and BT Securities Corporation, Defendants. No. C-1-94-735. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. May 9, 1996. *1271 *1272 *1273 Thomas S. Cald
455 F.Supp.2d 399 (2006) SENSORMATIC SECURITY CORPORATION v. SENSORMATIC ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, et al. Civil Action No. DKC 2002-1565. United States District Court, D. Maryland. September 7, 2006. *400 *401 *402 *403 <
Richard v. Bell Atlantic Corporationpublic domain
946 F.Supp. 54 (1996) Iris RICHARD, Jonathan Barnes, Kareem Abdul-Ali, Rosalyn Baylor, Joseph Bishop, Jr., Edward Brooks, Alvera Bullock, Eric Burden, Wilbert Burgess, Michael Camp, James Carrington, Reginald Clark, Diann R. Cooper, Desta Daggett, Raymond Flowers, Clemantis Fortson, Michael Gillis, Faye Green, Kelvin Gunn, Syed Hassan, Brian Holloway, Marc Houston, Patrick Hunt, Elvin Jackson, Christopher Joseph, Kevin Logan, Vient Aries McKoy, Venida Me
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4243321 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS