Cases

[Cite as Whitaker v. Whitaker, 2020-Ohio-2774.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO FAYETTE COUNTY CARRIE M. WHITAKER, : Appellee and Cross-Appellant, : CASE NOS. CA2019-05-008 CA2019-05-009 :

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DAVID CODREA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. No. 18-cv-03086 (DLF) BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is plaintiffs David Codrea’s and Owen Monroe’s Motion fo

[Cite as State v. Whitaker, 2024-Ohio-2495.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. L-23-1142 Appellee Trial Court No. CR0202202315 v. Joshua Whitaker DECISION AND JUDGMENT Appellant

11/06/2024 DA 22-0083 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2024 MT 255 STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. WES LEE WHITAKER, Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL FROM: District Court of the Fourth Judicial District,

WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge. Ashton (“Ash”) Whitaker is a 17 year-old high school senior who has what would *1039seem like a simple request: to use the boys’ restroom while at school. However, the Defendants, the Kenosha Unified School District and its superintendent, Sue Savaglio, (the “School District”) believe that the request is not so simple because Ash

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-91,581-06 EX PARTE TRACY DION WHITAKER, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 18CR20817C IN THE 123RD DISTRICT COURT FROM SHELBY COUNTY Per curiam. ORDER Applicant pleaded guilty to engaging in orga

Barrett, Circuit Judge. Aleksey Arkadyevich Ruderman is seeking to avoid removal to Belarus, his native country. An immigration judge ruled that Ruderman was inadmissible under the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)(B), and thus subject to removal. The judge also held that Ruderman was not eligib

Emmet G. Sullivan, United States District Judge When Congress passed the Refugee Act in 1980, it made its intentions clear: the purpose was to enforce the "historic policy of the United States to respond to the urgent needs of persons subject to persecution in their homelands." Refugee Act of 1980, § 101(a), Pub. L. No. 96-212, 94 Stat. 102

PER CURIAM: Petitioner, MD Titumir Alom, a native and citizen of Bangladesh, seeks review of a July 28, 2017 decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") affirming an October 3, 2016 decision of an Immigration Judge ("IJ") denying Alom's application for a good faith marriage waiver of the joint filing requirement to remove the conditions on his permanent residency. Alom also see

Judgment rendered May 21, 2025. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 922, La. C. Cr. P. No. 56,295-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** STATE OF LOUISIANA Appellee

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 21-2434 _____________ GARRETT KAJMOWICZ, Appellant v. MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, in his official capacity as former Acting Attorney General United States of America; BUREAU OF ALCOHOL TOBACCO FIREARMS & EXPLOSIVES,

LAWRENCE J. VILARDO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *98Ranjith Singh is a citizen of India under a final immigration order of removal from the United States. On July 29, 2018, Singh filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6233 Doc: 75 Filed: 07/08/2024 Pg: 1 of 13 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-6233 JOHNNIE R. SIMMONS, JR. Plaintiff – Appellant, v. R. WHITAKER, M.J.D.; D. BROWN, Sergeant; C. WALTZ, Superintendent;

OPINION AND ORDER (1) DENYING DEBTOR’S EX PARTE MOTION TO REOPEN CASE, BUT WAIVING MOTION FILING FEE; AND (2) STRIKING THE “CERTIFICATE OF DEBTOR EDUCATION” FILED OCTOBER 2, 2017 Thomas J. Tucker, United States Bankruptcy Judge This case is before the Court on the Debtor’s motion filed October 2, 2017, entitled “Motion To Reopen/Reinstate Case and Waive Fee to Reopen” (Doc

2022 WI 54 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2020AP29-CR COMPLETE TITLE: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Westley D. Whitaker, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner. REVIEW OF DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS R

ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Defendant Barry Whitaker ("Defendant") stands accused by way of a five-count Indictment returned on November 7, 2017, with the following: (1) Possession of Heroin with Intent to Distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841<

LYNCH, Circuit Judge. Francisco Avelar-Gonzalez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, seeks judicial review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision affirming an Immigration Judge's (IJ) denial of Avelar-Gonzalez's requests for asylum under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) § 208(a),

OPINION AND ORDER Robert L. Miller, Jr., Judge The Driver’s Privacy, Protection Act of 1994, 18 U.S.C. § 2721 et seq., secures from prying eyes the personal information held in state department of motor vehicles records. Appriss, Inc. sold two drivers’ accident reports to businesses, which then used those reports to solicit the drivers. The drivers brought a putative class, action against Appriss for vi

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and

TIMOTHY J. KELLY, United States District Judge *5Mary Tyes-Williams, an African-American woman, has worked in various chaplaincy positions for the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) since 2004. She describes the first decade of her career as a steady climb marked by superior performance reviews and robust skills development. After 11 years with BOP, however, she ran into trouble