⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Whitaker v. Keystone Manufacturing Inc.”

Supreme Court of Iowa · 1998-11-25 · Published · cited 18× · 586 N.W.2d 340; 1998 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 281; 1998 WL 820032
586 N.W.2d 340 (1998) KEYSTONE ELECTRICAL MANUFACTURING, CO., Appellant, v. CITY OF DES MOINES, Appellee. MERCHANTS WHITE LINE WAREHOUSING, INC., Reppert Transfer & Storage Co., and Ackerman Auto Parts, Co., Appellees, v. CITY OF DES MOINES, Appellant. No. 96-2188. Supreme Court of Iowa. November 25, 1998. *342 Je
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-03-03 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 15-25-00001-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/3/2025 10:43 PM Case No. 15-25-00001-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE _______________________________________________
District Court, District of Columbia · 2020-09-24 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) ISAAC HARRIS, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 17-cv-01371 (APM)
District Court, D. South Carolina · 2017-05-26 · Published · cited 4× · 254 F. Supp. 3d 765; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80938
ORDER AND OPINION J. Michelle Childs, United States District Court Judge Defendants DIRECTV, Inc., DIRECTV, LLC (together, “DirecTV”) and MasTec North America, Inc. (“MasTec”) (collectively, “Defendants”)1 have filed 14 motions seeking summary judgment on claims arising under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., asserted by Plaintiffs Jame
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2026-05-27 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-3250 ALMA SANCHEZ, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EL MILAGRO, INC., doing business as EL MILAGRO, Defendant-Appellee. _________
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2026-05-27 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-3250 ALMA SANCHEZ, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EL MILAGRO, INC., doing business as EL MILAGRO, Defendant-Appellee. _________
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2026-05-27 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-3250 ALMA SANCHEZ, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EL MILAGRO, INC., doing business as EL MILAGRO, Defendant-Appellee. _________
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977-04-28 · Published · cited 8× · 551 F.2d 622; 194 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 113; 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 13622
GODBOLD, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff Fred Whitaker Co. (Whitaker) charges that E. T. Barwick Industries, Inc. (Barwick) has infringed the ex- *624 elusive rights Whitaker owns under claims 4 1 and 10
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2018-11-14 · Published · cited 10× · 356 F. Supp. 3d 1148
JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1153THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) Defendants JWS's and KPK's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, filed June 17, 2016 (Doc. 39)("MSJ"); and (ii) the Plaintiff's Cross Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Defendants' Exemption Defense, filed June 17, 2016 (Doc. 4
District Court, D. Delaware · 2015-03-11 · Published · cited 0× · 82 F. Supp. 3d 539; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29465; 2015 WL 1069274
MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBINSON, District Judge I. INTRODUCTION On May 21, 2014, plaintiff Temple-Inland Inc. (“plaintiff’) filed a complaint against defendants Thomas Cook (“Mr. Cook”), in his capacity as the Secretary of Finance for the State of Delaware; David M. Gregor (“Mr. Gregor”), in his capacity as the State Escheator of the State of Delaware; and Michelle M. Whitaker (“Ms. Whitaker”)
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985-02-20 · Published · cited 0× · 755 F.2d 315
OPINION OF THE COURT WEIS, Circuit Judge. In this diversity case a jury awarded a verdict in favor of a subcontractor’s employee who was injured while working on the defendant’s premises. We conclude that the verdict is sustainable despite the defendant’s assertion of trial error. We also determine that the trial judge properly ruled that, based on contractual provisions, defendant was entitled to indemni
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2007-08-24 · Published · cited 32× · 235 S.W.3d 287; 2007 Tex. App. LEXIS 6832; 2007 WL 2405118
235 S.W.3d 287 (2007) The BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant v. GUNDERSON, INC. and ASF-Keystone, Inc., Appellees. No. 2-06-274-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. August 24, 2007. *289 Merrick C. Walton, Houston, TX, and Hall & Evans, LLC and Thomas L. Beam, Denver, CO, for Appellant. W
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998-05-01 · Published · cited 115× · 143 F.3d 71; 22 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1208; 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 8364; 1998 WL 216951
MESKILL, Circuit Judge: This is a consolidated appeal from judgments rendered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Scheindlin, J., in connection with two lawsuits, Allen v. West Point-Pepperell, Inc., 90 Civ. 3841 (S.D.N.Y.), and Krumme v. West Point-Pepperell, 89 Civ. 2016 (S.D.N.Y.). At the heart of this appeal is a dispute among the parties over a pension plan co
District Court, D. Maine · 1977-08-09 · Published · cited 47× · 436 F. Supp. 262; 22 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 407; 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14559
436 F.Supp. 262 (1977) LINCOLN PULP & PAPER CO., INC., Plaintiff, v. DRAVO CORPORATION, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY, Koppers Company, and Whiting Corporation, Third-Party Defendants. Civ. No. 74-65-ND. United States District Court, D. Maine, N. D. August 9, 1977. *263
District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1969-04-25 · Published · cited 0× · 301 F. Supp. 937; 1969 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13441
MEMORANDUM OPINION HARPER, Chief Judge. This is a suit under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., in which the Secretary under section 17 seeks to enjoin the defendants from violating the minimum wage, overtime and record-keeping provisions under section 15(a) (2) and (a) (5), and further for the restraint of any withholding of minimum wage or overtime compensation. Th
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985-02-20 · Published · cited 8× · 755 F.2d 315; 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 29233
755 F.2d 315 John J. WILLEY and Linda Willey, his wife, Appellants in 84-1075,v.MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Appellant in 84-1059,v.HAVERSTICK-BORTHWICK COMPANY, Appellant in 84-1076,andDresher Mechanical Company, Appellant in 84-1063. Nos. 84-1059, 84-1063, 84-1075 and 84-1076. United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Argued
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1987-12-23 · Published · cited 37× · 82 B.R. 258; 1987 Bankr. LEXIS 1995; 1987 WL 25236
82 B.R. 258 (1987) In re VERMONT TOY WORKS, INC., Debtor. CHITTENDEN TRUST COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. SEBERT LUMBER, CO., INC., Defendant, J.C. Palmisano, Esq., Trustee and Intervening Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 85-252, Adv. P. No. 86-0007. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont. December 23, 1987. *259
United States Court of Claims · 1954-05-04 · Published · cited 11× · 121 F. Supp. 212; 128 Ct. Cl. 221; 1954 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 129
121 F.Supp. 212 (1954) HUGHES TRANSP., Inc. v. UNITED STATES. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY v. UNITED STATES. No. 525-52. United States Court of Claims. May 4, 1954. *213 *214 Daryal A. Myse, Washington, D. C., Hand & Myse, Washington, D. C., on the brief, for plaintiff. J. D
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998-05-01 · Published · cited 46× · 143 F.3d 71
143 F.3d 71 22 Employee Benefits Cas. 1208,Pens. Plan Guide (CCH) P 23942YRobert D. KRUMME, Plaintiff-Appellee,Gordon E. Allen; John Currier; Nicholas Pallotta; JamesJ. Dunne; Leo Fornero; Gerard P. Mandry; NormanK. Matheson; Cochran P. Supplee andBruce E. Moore, Plaintiffs-Appellees,Cross-Appellants,v.WESTPOINT STEVENS INC., formerly known as WestPoint-Pepperell, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appell
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998-07-21 · Published · cited 10× · 715 A.2d 390; 552 Pa. 304; 47 ERC (BNA) 1439; 1998 Pa. LEXIS 1469
552 Pa. 304 (1998) 715 A.2d 390 ADAMS SANITATION COMPANY, INC., Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, Appellee. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued February 3, 1998. Decided July 21, 1998. *306 James M. Brogan, Philadelphia, William Roger Truitt, Stephanie P.