⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Whitaker v. Delaware County District Attorney”

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2020-11-03 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT TRACY WHITAKER, : No. 139 MM 2020 : Petitioner : : : v. : :
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025-03-27 · Published · cited 3× · 2025 Ohio 1078
[Cite as PNC Bank Natl. Assn. v. Whitaker, 2025-Ohio-1078.] COURT OF APPEALS FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PNC BANK NATIONAL : JUDGES: ASSOCIATION SUCCESSOR : Hon. Craig R. Baldwin, P.J. BY MERGER : Hon. Michael D. Hess, J.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021-01-25 · Published · cited 165× · 985 F.3d 1173
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BRIAN WHITAKER, No. 19-56497 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:19-cv-06605- MWF-E TESLA MOTORS, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Defendant-Appellee, OPINION and DOES, 1–10, D
Linn v. Whitakerpublic domain
Montana Supreme Court · 2007-02-21 · Published · cited 11× · 2007 MT 46; 336 Mont. 131; 2007 Mont. LEXIS 57; 152 P.3d 1282
JUSTICE RICE delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Susan Linn (Linn) appeals the decision of the Fourth Judicial District Court, Missoula County, dismissing her complaint with prejudice as a sanction for discovery abuses. We affirm. ¶2 We consider the following issue on appeal:
District Court, C.D. California · 2003-11-17 · Published · cited 4× · 291 F. Supp. 2d 1132; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20805; 2003 WL 22722037
291 F.Supp.2d 1132 (2003) Jack N. WHITAKER; Ramon Portillo, aka Candido Gutierrez-Elenes; Avelino Avalos; Eduardo Martinez; Virginia Delgado, aka Edna Cabrera; Ricardo Carrizoza, aka Vicente Lopez-Carrizoza; Lauro Rocha-Gaxiola; Antonio Rocha Gastelum, Plaintiffs, v. Gil GARCETTI, Curtis A. Hazell, David Demerjian, Jason Lustig, County of Los Angeles, Willie Williams, Dan Harden, Horacio Marco, Chuck Livingston, Keith Lewis, City of Los Angeles,
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2023-06-06 · Published · cited 162× · 69 F.4th 96
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______________ No. 21-2835 ______________ BRYAN DAVID RANGE, Appellant v. ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; REGINA LOMBARDO, Acting Director, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives __________
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020-11-24 · Published · cited 49× · 980 F.3d 897
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 19-1687 LISA M. FOLAJTAR, Appellant v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES; ACTING DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS, AND EXPLOSIVES; DIRECTOR OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appeal from the United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001-07-25 · Published · cited 118× · 261 F.3d 196; 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 16707
261 F.3d 196 (2nd Cir. 2001) RIDLEY M. WHITAKER, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.AMERICAN TELECASTING, INC. and ROSENTHAL, JUDELL & UCHIMA, Defendants-Appellees,andFRESNO TELSAT, INC., JAMES A. SIMON and JAS PARTNERS, LTD., and JOHN DOES NOS. 1-10 (which are individuals and entities whose identities are unknown), Defendants. Docket Nos. 99-9275 (L), 00-7313 (CON)August Term 2000 UNITE
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001-07-25 · Published · cited 361× · 261 F.3d 196
COVELLO, District Judge: Plaintiff-appellant Ridley M. Whitaker appeals from two orders rendered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Scheindlin, /., denying the plaintiffs motion to remand and dismissing the amended complaint. In the first order appealed, the district court denied the motion to remand on grounds that removal was timely under 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b), with jurisdiction in fed
Whitaker v. DeVillapublic domain
Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1997-02-03 · Published · cited 23× · 687 A.2d 738; 147 N.J. 341; 1997 N.J. LEXIS 32
147 N.J. 341 (1997) 687 A.2d 738 LOUIS SCOTT WHITAKER AND LAURA WHITAKER, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS AND CROSS-APPELLANTS, v. RONALD A. DeVILLA, ROMEO A. DeVILLA, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS AND CROSS-RESPONDENTS, AND JOHN DOE NOS. 1-10 (FICTITIOUS PERSONS) AND ABC CORP. NOS. 1-10 (FICTITIOUS ENTITIES), DEFENDANTS, AND ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY, INTERVENOR-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT. Th
Washington Supreme Court · 2002-03-14 · Published · cited 16× · 42 P.3d 394; 145 Wash. 2d 702
42 P.3d 394 (2002) 145 Wash.2d 702 GRANT COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 5, a municipal corporation; Wyatt D. Hanks and Annette Hanks, husband and wife, Appellants, v. CITY OF MOSES LAKE, a municipal corporation, Respondent. Busby International, Inc., a Washington corporation; D & L Foundry and Supply, Inc., a Washington corporation; Hanson Processing LLC, a Washington limited liability company; EKA Chemicals,
District Court, District of Columbia · 2017-09-07 · Published · cited 0× · 270 F. Supp. 3d 72
MEMORANDUM OPINION (September 2017) [Dkts. ## 53, 54, 55, 56, 57] RICHARD. J. LEON, United States District Judge. For over a decade, D.C. Chartered Health Plan, Inc. (“Chartered”), contracted with the District of Columbia to'provide healthcare services to low-income residents of the District. Then,' in 2012, the District. became concer
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020-08-31 · Published · cited 0×
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1952 GAVIN GRIMM, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. GLOUCESTER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Defendant – Appellant. ----------------------------- NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FUND, INC.; INTERACT: ADVOCATES FOR INTERSEX YOUTH;
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017-08-25 · Published · cited 2× · 276 F. Supp. 3d 324
MEMORANDUM OPINION EDWARD G. SMITH, J. The current issue before the court— whether the court should issue a preliminary injunction prohibiting a school district from maintaining its practice that started in the 2016-17 school year of allowing transgender students 'to use the bathrooms and locker rooms of the sex to which they identify—involves intricate and genuine issues, relating to, inter alia,
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993-09-24 · Published · cited 23× · 5 F.3d 1255
DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge: These consolidated appeals arise from complaints filed by School District 1J, Mult-nomah County, Oregon (the “School District”). The School District sought to recover the cost of removing asbestos-containing products from over 100 school buildings. The defendants are installers and manufacturers of asbestos products. In a series of rulings in these cases, the district court granted summary
School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation E.J. Bartells Company, a Washington Corporation A.P. Green Refractories Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation, and Fibreboard Corp., a Delaware Corporation as Successor in Interest to the Paraffine Companies, Inc., Pabco Products, Inc., Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Plant Rubber & Asbestos Works and Plant Rubber & Asbestos Co., School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Keene Corporation, a New York Corporation Individually and as Successor in Interest to the Baldwin Ehret Hill Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Us Gypsum Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Flintkote Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporationpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993-09-24 · Published · cited 1131× · 5 F.3d 1255; 93 Daily Journal DAR 12208; 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7148; 26 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1428; 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 24540
5 F.3d 1255 26 Fed.R.Serv.3d 1428, 85 Ed. Law Rep. 1070,Prod.Liab.Rep.(CCH)P 13,640 SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1J, MULTNOMAH COUNTY, OREGON, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.ACandS, INC., a Pennsylvania corporation, et al.; E.J.Bartells Company, a Washington corporation; A.P.Green Refractories Company,Defendants-Appellees.SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1J, MULTNOMAH COUNTY, OREGON, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.ACandS,
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989-05-05 · Published · cited 4× · 727 F. Supp. 920; 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4968; 1989 WL 158491
727 F.Supp. 920 (1989) UNITED STATES of America v. PREMISES KNOWN AS 5100 WHITAKER AVENUE, PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA, a Parcel of Real Property and all Improvements Thereon, and all Appurtenances Thereto, Lying in Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania, said Property Being Titled to Encarnacion Guzman and Sonia Guzman, his Wife, and any and all Proceeds from the Sale of said Property. Civ. A. No. 89-2293.
District Court, S.D. New York · 2010-05-04 · Published · cited 5× · 712 F. Supp. 2d 104; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43453; 2010 WL 1790051
712 F.Supp.2d 104 (2010) KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. IKB DEUTSCHE INDUSTRIEBANK AG, et al., Defendants. Iowa Student Loan Liquidity Corporation, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. IKB Deutsche Industriebank AG, et al., Defendants. Nos. 09 Civ. 8387(SAS), No. 09 Civ. 8822(SAS). Uni
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970-10-09 · Published · cited 2× · 440 Pa. 143; 269 A.2d 886; 1970 Pa. LEXIS 552
Opinion by Me. Justice Eagen, On June 21, 1967, Philip H. Whitaker was convicted by a jury in Delaware County of murder in the second degree. A new trial was refused and á prison sentence of 6 to 12 years was imposed. This appeal was then filed. We affirm. It is first argued that the trial evidence was insufficient to sustain the jury’s verdict. Our study of the record readily manifests tha
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-04-17 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX