⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Wheeler v. Short”

Sapp v. Wheelerpublic domain
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013-02-20 · Published · cited 0× · 402 S.C. 502; 741 S.E.2d 565; 2013 WL 621206; 2013 S.C. App. LEXIS 45
SHORT, J. In this action brought by J. Mars Sapp (Sapp) to collect rent obligations, Will Wheeler (Wheeler) appeals from a $252,798 verdict against him, arguing the trial court erred in denying his: (1) motion for a directed verdict on the claim for future damages; (2) motion for a directed verdict based on the statute of limitations; (3) request for a jury charge on the three-year statute of limitations for a breach of contra
District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018-08-02 · Published · cited 0× · 322 F. Supp. 3d 445
GEORGE B. DANIELS, United States District Judge *449Plaintiff Rod Wheeler brings this action asserting claims for defamation per se and, in the alternative, defamation and libel per quod , against Defendant Fox News Network LLC ("Fox News"), its parent company, Defendant Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc. ("21st Century Fox" and, with Fox News, "Fox"), Fox
Wheeler v. Wheelerpublic domain
North Carolina Business Court · 2018-11-15 · Published · cited 0× · 2018 NCBC 117
Wheeler v. Wheeler, 2018 NCBC 117. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION MECKLENBURG COUNTY 17 CVS 16248 CHRISTOPHER GRAY WHEELER, Plaintiff, v. (REDACTED) ORDER AND OPINION JOSEPH GRAY WHEELER; SCOTT ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A. MOE; and YALE CAROLIN
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009-01-30 · Published · cited 1× · 673 S.E.2d 836; 381 S.C. 548; 2009 S.C. App. LEXIS 16
381 S.C. 548 (2009) 673 S.E.2d 836 Ex Parte Janice S. WHEELER, Respondent, v. In re ESTATE OF Dorothy Fillius GREEN, Carlette Reynolds, Edward Scott Reynolds, Dawn Flack Reynolds, Thomas A. & Betty H. Considine, Lucy Ann Strickland, Maxine Green Thomas, John G. & Lois M. Considine, Susan C. Considine, James R. Considine, Carol Evans Fastnaught, Roberta Sodaro, Elizabeth Sodaro Wolters, Karen Sodaro Little, Douglas
State v. Shortpublic domain
Nebraska Supreme Court · 2021-09-17 · Published · cited 19× · 964 N.W.2d 272; 310 Neb. 81
Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 12/10/2021 08:08 AM CST - 81 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 310 Nebraska Reports STATE v. SHORT Cite as 310 Neb. 81 State of Nebraska, appel
Bevill v. Wheelerpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024-05-30 · Published · cited 4× · 103 F.4th 363
Case: 23-40321 Document: 116-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/30/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 23-40321 FILED
Wheeler v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of Delaware · 2023-04-11 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STEPHEN WHEELER, § § No. 244, 2022 Defendant Below, § Appellant, § Court Below: Superior Court § of the State of Delaware v. § § Cr. ID No. 1610013171(S) STATE OF DELAWARE, §
Syracuse City Court · 2025-08-22 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 NY Slip Op 25196
Wheeler v D'Antonio (2025 NY Slip Op 25196) [*1] Wheeler v D'Antonio 2025 NY Slip Op 25196 Decided on August 22, 2025 City Court Of Syracuse, Onondaga County Tadros, J. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 43
Gloss v. Wheelerpublic domain
Supreme Court of Virginia · 2023-05-18 · Published · cited 0×
PRESENT: All the Justices B. ALAN GLOSS, ET AL. OPINION BY v. Record No. 210779 JUSTICE WESLEY G. RUSSELL, JR. MAY 18, 2023 ANN B. WHEELER, ET AL. FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY Dennis J. Smith, Judge Designate B. Alan Gloss and Carol Fox (“plaintiffs”), residents of Pri
People v. Wheelerpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022-03-10 · Published · cited 3× · 164 N.Y.S.3d 313; 203 A.D.3d 1330; 2022 NY Slip Op 01485
People v Wheeler (2022 NY Slip Op 01485) People v Wheeler 2022 NY Slip Op 01485 Decided on March 10, 2022 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law §
State v. Wheelerpublic domain
Superior Court of Delaware · 2022-06-14 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ID No. 1610013171 v. ) ) ) STEPHEN WHEELER, ) ) Petitioner/Defendant. )
People v. Wheelerpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022-01-26 · Published · cited 3× · 160 N.Y.S.3d 337; 201 A.D.3d 960; 2022 NY Slip Op 00442
People v Wheeler (2022 NY Slip Op 00442) People v Wheeler 2022 NY Slip Op 00442 Decided on January 26, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary La
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2020-06-03 · Published · cited 0×
06/03/2020 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs May 1, 2020 TROY MICHAEL WHEELER v. ANGELA MARIE (TURNER) WHEELER Appeal from the Circuit Court for Macon County No. 18-CV-11 Clara W. Byrd, Judge ___________________________________
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2025-02-05 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION NOTICE DATED AND FILED This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports. February 5, 2025 A party may file with the Supreme Court a
Wheeler v. Piazzapublic domain
District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2019-03-05 · Published · cited 26× · 364 F. Supp. 3d 870
Robert M. Dow, Jr., United States District Judge In his Second Amended Complaint, Plaintiff Paul Wheeler renews his claims against Defendants Peter Piazza, Sydney Roberts, Donnelle Grygiel, and Elmer Garza (collectively "Defendants") for conspiring to and then violating his First Amendment rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont) · 2022-08-31 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-22-00251-CV __________________ IN RE CEDRIC WHEELER __________________________________________________________________ Original Proceeding 457th District C
District Court, District of Columbia · 2022-01-18 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GIANNA WHEELER, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 20-cv-02735 (CRC) AMERICAN UNIVERSITY et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION University administrators and campus police face few harder tasks than responding to a student experiencing
Wheeler v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2018-06-25 · Published · cited 0×
Robert Wheeler v. State of Maryland, No. 50, September Term 2017, Opinion by Hotten, J. CRIMINAL LAW – EVIDENCE – ESTABLISHING CHAIN OF CUSTODY – The Court of Appeals held that Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article §§ 10-1001, 10-1002, and 10-1003 do not require strict application. Rather, the statutes encourage the goal of maintaining the integrity of the evidence, which is satisfied when the State presents sufficient evidence to negate the possibility of tampering. CRIMINAL LAW – EVIDENCE
District Court, District of Columbia · 2021-08-23 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GUNPOWDER RIVERKEEPER, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-02063-CJN MICHAEL S. REGAN, Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Gunpowder Riverkeeper challenges the Environmental P
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2019-02-12 · Published · cited 7× · 361 F. Supp. 3d 577
T. S. Ellis, III, United States District Judge This case arises from a somewhat bizarre and nearly tragic set of events. Plaintiff, a citizen and resident of Poland, claims Officers Wheeler, Adcock, Blakely, Bronte-Tinkew, Clark, Grande, Jakowicz, Labarca, McNaught, Mulhern, and Zesk ("the police defendants") are liable for violating plaintiff's Fourteenth and Fourth Amendment rights pursuant to