Cases

130 F.Supp.2d 161 (2001) HARVARD APPARATUS, INC., Plaintiff, v. Barry COWEN, d/b/a Yale Apparatus, Defendant. No. Civ.A. 98-11124-MBB. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. January 23, 2001. *162 *163 Franklin H. Levy, Abrams, Roberts, Klickstein & Levy, Boston, MA, for Harvard A

236 F.Supp.2d 79 (2002) Paul G. BAMBERG, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SG COWEN Defendant. Janet Baker, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SG Cowen Defendant. Janet Baker, et al., Plaintiffs, v. KPMG Singapore Defendant. No. CIV.A.02-CV-10304-PB No. CIV.A.02-CV-10367-PB. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. December 9, 2002.

MITCHELL, District Judge. This matter came on for trial on August 2, 1967. The Court, after full consideration of this matter and being fully advised in the premises, makes the following findings of fact and following conclusions of law: FINDINGS OF FACT I Motels of Terrebonne, Inc., filed a voluntary petition for bankruptcy on April 7, 1964 in the United States District Cou

OPINION OF THE COURT ALITO, Circuit Judge: This is an appeal from a district court decision holding that Graco Trucking Corporation (Graco) and a Graco officer were required to pay a former employee, Sherman Wheeler, the wages specified by the Federal-Aid Highway Act, 23 U.S.C. § 113(a) (1988), as well as liquidated damages, counsel fees, and expenses. We reverse, but we do not reach the question concerni

985 F.2d 108 142 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2375, 124 Lab.Cas. P 10,518,1 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 345 Sherman WHEELERv.GRACO TRUCKING CORPORATION, Teamsters Local Union # 312,General Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Helpers & Yardmen,Local # 470, Edward Conhaim,Graco Trucking Corporation and Edward Conhaim, Appellants. No. 91-2040. United States Court of App

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE TESLA MOTORS, INC. ) CONSOLIDATED STOCKHOLDER LITIGATION ) C.A. No. 12711-VCS MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: January 18, 2022 Date Decided: April 27, 2022 Jay W. Eisenhofer, Esquire, Christine M. Mackintosh, Esquire, Kelly L. Tucker, Esquire and Vivek Upadhya, Esquire of Grant & Eisenhofer P.A., Wilming

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1922 CLEMENTE PROPERTIES, INC.; 21 IN RIGHT, INC.; ROBERTO CLEMENTE, JR.; LUIS ROBERTO CLEMENTE; ROBERTO ENRIQUE CLEMENTE, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. HON. PEDRO R. PIERLUISI-URRUTIA, Governor of Puerto Rico, in his official and individual capacity and as representative of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; EILEEN M. VÉLEZ-VEGA, Secretary of

OPINION OF THE COURT SLOVITER, Circuit Judge. EP MedSystems, Inc. appeals the dismissal with prejudice of its securities action against EchoCath, Inc. According to the complaint, the Chief Executive Officer of EchoCath enticed MedSystems into investing $1.4 million in EchoCath by assuring MedSystems that lengthy negotiations had already taken place with four promi

499 F.3d 239 (2007) PENNSYLVANIA EMPLOYEES BENEFIT TRUST FUND on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated; Joseph Macken; Commissioner Linda A. Watters, Appellants v. ZENECA INC; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP. No. 05-5340. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued June 5, 2007. Filed: August 17, 2007.

591 F.Supp.2d 1023 (2008) In re: UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION. Nos. 06-CV-1216, 27 CV 06-8085. United States District Court, D. Minnesota. December 24, 2008. *1026 Edward F. Haber, Michelle H. Blauner, Shapiro Haber & Urmy LLP, Boston, MA, Jack L. Chestnut, Jeffrey D. Bores, Karl L. Cambronne, Che

ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION AND DEFENDANT’S CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT NICHOLS, Judge. Plaintiff, a Louisiana corporation, brings this action to recover certain monies paid to defendant consequent to the application of an allegedly unlawful profit limitations provision in its Government contract. This court’s

151 F.Supp.2d 371 (2001) In re LIVENT, INC. NOTEHOLDERS SECURITIES LITIGATION. This document relates to all actions. Alice F. Rieger, acting by and through her attorney-in-fact Robert L. Walters, Tri-Links Investment Trust, and Cerberus Capital Management, L.P., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Garth Drabinsky, Myron I. Gottlieb, Gordon Eckstein, Robert Topol, Conrad M. Black, Joseph Rotman, Scot

Opinions of the United 2007 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 8-17-2007 PA Empl Benefit v. Zeneca Inc Precedential or

256 Kan. 300 (1994) DEBORAH A. WAGHER, Appellee, v. GUY'S FOODS, INC., Appellant. No. 68,980 Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed December 9, 1994. Susan P. Selvidge, of Fleeson, Gooing, Coulson & Kitch, of Wichita, argued the cause and was on the briefs for appellant. Marc A. Powell, of Kahrs, Nelson, Fanning, Hite & Kellogg, of Wichi

29 F.Supp.2d 707 (1998) LANE CONSTRUCTION CORP., Plaintiff, v. BROWN & ROOT, INC., Defendant. Moore Brothers Company, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Brown & Root, Inc., Defendant. Nos. 1:96CV1809, 1:96CV1810. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. December 30, 1998. *708

COLLINS, Judge. The Department of the Air Force, in September 1958, awarded to plaintiff a contract for the transportation of passengers between Charleston, South Carolina, and Nouasseur, Morocco. Subsequently, after plaintiff had been performing for more than 2 months, the Air Force canceled the contract on the ground that the aw

OP ALA, Justice, dissenting. ¶ 1 Desiring, no doubt, to avoid a result perceived to be harsh, the court today (1) invents a new doctrine that a litigant may never be excluded from the courtroom — solely on the grounds of disfigurement — during any phase of the civil trial, (2) subtly and gratuitously injects the Americans with Disabilities Act [ADA]1 into

28 F.3d 347 146 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2586, 63 USLW 2008,128 Lab.Cas. P 11,137 LUDEN'S INC., Appellee,v.LOCAL UNION NO. 6 OF the BAKERY, CONFECTIONERY AND TOBACCOWORKERS' INTERNATIONAL UNION OF AMERICA; AmericanArbitration Association,Bakery, Confectionery and Tobacco Workers' InternationalLocal Union 6, Appellant. No. 92-1982. United States Court

COFFEY, Circuit Judge. Joseph Pantoja, a member of Teamsters Local Union No. 705 in Chicago, sued Holland Motor Express, Inc. (Holland), alleging that Holland’s refusal to rehire him after he was involved in a trucking accident violated its collective bargaining agreement (CBA) with the union and amounted to a retaliatory discharge under Illinois tort law. The district court gra

590 F.Supp. 1423 (1984) REBORN ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff, v. FINE CHILD, INC., Andrews MacLaren, Inc., Andrews MacLaren Ltd., Ben's for Kids, Inc., James Fine, and Mark Wein, Defendants. No. 82 Civ. 2451 (ADS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. June 20, 1984. *1424 *1425