Cases

498 F.Supp.2d 1019 (2007) COMERICA INC., Plaintiff, v. ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE CO. and Houston Casualty Co., Defendants. No. 06-10353. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. July 27, 2007. *1020 Robert G. Brower, Bodman, Detroit, MI, for Plaintiff. Steven M. Wolock, Maddin, Hauser, Southfield, MI

ORDER MARCIA MORALES HOWARD, United States District Judge THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendant, Southern-Owners Insurance Company’s Motion to Dismiss Zurich American Insurance Company’s Second Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Cause of Action (Doc. 49; Motion), filed on September 1, 2016. Plaintiff, Zurich American Insurance Company (Plaintiff or ZAIC), filed a response on September 15, 2

Reversed and Dismissed and Plurality and Dissenting Opinions filed October 13, 2020. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-18-00894-CV HARRIS COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT, Appellant V. IQ LIFE SCIENCES CORPORATION, Appellee On Appeal from the 333rd District Court Harris

944 F.2d 1131 15 UCC Rep.Serv.2d 1225 CASSIDY PODELL LYNCH, INC.v.SNYDERGENERAL CORPORATIONSnydergeneral Corporation ("SnyderGeneral"), Appellant.CASSIDY PODELL LYNCH, INC.v.SNYDERGENERAL CORPORATION.Cassidy Podell Lynch, Inc., Appellant. Nos. 90-5765, 90-5770. United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Argued A

71 S.W.3d 691 (2002) TRAU-MED OF AMERICA, INC. d/b/a/ Bellevue Clinic v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al. Supreme Court of Tennessee. March 25, 2002. *694 R. Layne Holley, Memphis, Tennessee, and William H. Frye, Jackson, Tennessee, for the appellants, Allstate Insurance Company, Vickie Harris, Charles E. Ferrell, Leslie Johnson, and Ron Iden.<

[Cite as T & R Properties, Inc. v. Wimberly, 2020-Ohio-4279.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT T&R Properties, Inc., : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 19AP-567 v. : (M.C. No. 2019CVG-29217) Traci Wimberly,

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER (Fed.R.Civ.P. 56) BRUCE S. JENKINS, Senior District Judge. On June 10, 2010, plaintiff Cincinnati Insurance Company (“Cincinnati”) commenced this action seeking a declaratory judgment that Cincinnati has no duty to defend or indemnify AMSCO under the terms of its commercial general liability insurance policies and commercial umbrella liability policies with r

477 F.3d 583 MATRIX GROUP LIMITED, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant,v.RAWLINGS SPORTING GOODS COMPANY; K2, Inc., Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees.Matrix Group Limited, Inc., a Florida Corporation with a principal place of business in Safety Harbor, County of Pinellas, State of Florida, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant,v.Rawlings Sporting Goods Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation with a principal place of busines

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WILLIAM E. SMITH, Chief Judge. In 2001, Plaintiff Global ePoint, Inc. (“Global”) sold its lottery assets to Defendant GTECH Corporation’s (“GTECH”) predecessor, Interlott Technologies, Inc. *181(“Interlott”).1 At the time the deal closed, Global received an initial payment of $13.5 millio

ORDER DUVAL, District Judge. On September 19, 2006, Berthelot, et al. v. Boh Bros. Construction, et al., C.A. No. 05-4182 was filed in the Eastern District of Louisiana. This case began the stream of complaints that have been filed as a result of damages arising out of all levee breaches which occurred in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. Berthelot was transf

MEMORANDUM & ORDER Young, District Judge I. INTRODUCTION This memorandum and order arises out of post-trial motions for attorney’s fees *285and other costs following a protracted legal struggle over the cleanup of Middle and Lower Mother Brook in the Hyde Park neighborhood of Boston. See Thomas & Betts Corp. v. New Alber

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ROBERT W. PRATT, District Judge. Before the Court are two motions for summary judgment. The first motion was filed by Plaintiff Chicago Insurance Co. (“CIC”) on May 4, 2011. Clerk’s No. 28. The City of Council Bluffs (the “City”), Daniel C. Larsen (“Larsen”), and Lyle W. Brown (“Brown”) (collectively “Defendants”) filed a response in opposition to CIC’s motion on October 25, 2

AGEE, Circuit Judge: Patrick Gerard Carson filed a qui tam suit on behalf of the United States and several states under the False Claims Act (“FCA”) and the state equivalents, claiming that his employer, HCR Manor Care, and related companies, Manor Care, Inc. and Heartland Employment Services, LLC, (collectively, “Manor Care”) were ov-erbilling the respective governments for medical services. Carson included a separate claim o

MARY GORDON BAKER, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Plaintiff Stoneledge at Lake Keowee Owners Association, Inc. ("Plaintiff" or "HOA") filed the instant action against Defendant Cincinnati Insurance Company ("CIC") in the Oconee County Court of Common Pleas in March of 2014; the matter was removed on May 13, 2014. (See generally Dkt. No. 1.) On December 15, 2014, the parties filed a Consent Motion to Stay, asking th

Judge STRAUB concurs in part and dissents in part in a separate opinion. DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON, Circuit Judge: This ease concerns the tremendous property damage caused by the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. Just months before the attacks, in April 2001, World Trade Center Properties LLC and affiliated companies (‘WTCP”)1 obtained 99-year leases for 1, 2, 4, and 5 World T

737 F.Supp.2d 662 (2010) William H. ASHER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNARCO MATERIAL HANDLING, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 06-548-ART. United States District Court, E.D. Kentucky, Southern Division, London. July 28, 2010. *666 Charles C. Adams, Jr., Thomas K. Herren, Herren & Adams, Lexington, KY, Don Russo, Lynn

449 B.R. 767 (2011) In re KIMBALL HILL, INC., et al., Debtors. KHI Liquidation Trust, Plaintiff, v. Wisenbaker Builder Services, Inc., and Wisenbaker Builder Services, Ltd., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 08 B 10095. Adversary No. 10 A 00824. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. June 3, 2011. *770 Gord

McGee Brown, J. Introduction {¶ 1} Sunoco, Inc. (R & M) owns and operates petroleum-refining facilities in several states, including Oregon, Ohio. Sunoco purchases electric service for its Oregon facility from the Toledo Edison Company, intervening appellee. {¶ 2} This case involves a contract between Sunoco and Toledo Edison f

[Cite as Owusu v. Hope Cancer Ctr. of Northwest Ohio, Inc., 2011-Ohio-4466.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT ALLEN COUNTY OSEI-TUTU OWUSU, M.D., PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO. 1-10-81 v. HOPE CANCER CENTER OF NORTHWEST OHIO, INC., ET AL., OPINION DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

122 F.Supp.2d 533 (2000) SDS USA, INC., Plaintiff, v. KEN SPECIALTIES, INCORPORATED, Defendant. No. CIV. 99-133. United States District Court, D. New Jersey. November 28, 2000. *534 *535 Keith E. Gliman, Lerner, David, Littenberg, Krumholz & Metlik, Westfield, NJ, for SDS USA, Inc.