Cases

Liu, J. *1129 In 1975, the Legislature enacted the Agricultural Labor Relations Act (ALRA) "to encourage and protect the right of agricultural employees to full freedom of association, self-organization, and designation of representatives of their own choosing, to negotiate the terms an

*1591Opinion SIMS, J. This case involves a challenge to the constitutionality of mandatory interest arbitration statutes applicable to agricultural employers. (Lab. Code, § 1164 et seq.; undesignated section references are to the Labor Code.) After agricultural employer The Hess Collection Winery (Hess) and United Food and Commerci

Filed 7/15/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT GERAWAN FARMING, INC., F077033 Petitioner, (44 ALRB No. 1, v. 2012-CE-041-VIS,

Filed 5/30/18 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT GERAWAN FARMING, INC., F073720 Petitioner, (42 ALRB No. 1) v. OPINION AGRICULTURAL LA

Filed 12/21/21; Certified for Publication 1/12/22 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE WESTERN GROWERS ASSOCIATION et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, A162343 v. (San Francisco City & County OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND Super.

Filed 5/14/15 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT GERAWAN FARMING, INC., F068526 Petitioner, (39 ALRB No. 17) v. AGRICULTURAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent; UNITED FARM WORKERS OF AMERICA, Real Party in Interest. GERAWAN FARMI

LEVY, J. *1140This case involves the intersection of two of the fundamental purposes of the Agricultural Labor Relations Act ( Labor Code, 1 § 1140 et seq.; the ALRA): one is the policy to provide agricultural workers with the right to choose in questions of labor representation through a secret ballot election process (§§ 1140.2, 1152, 115

Opinion GRODIN, J. Employer Harry Carian Sales (HCS) seeks review of a decision of the Agricultural Labor Relations Board (ALRB or Board) finding that HCS committed 30 unfair labor practices, and ordering HCS to bargain with the United Farm Workers (UFW). The principal issue raised in this case is whether the ALRB has authority to certify a un

Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist. Motion of Western Growers Association for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied.

STANIFORTH, J. I concur with the sound law, reasoning and conclusion expressed by Presiding Justice Brown but would add these further supportive observations. *334I Where we are asked to overturn a final order based upon the factual finding of the Agricultural Labor Relations Board (Board) the appeal court’s task commences with the

86 Cal.App.3d 448 (1978) 150 Cal. Rptr. 495 PERRY FARMS, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. AGRICULTURAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent; UNITED FARM WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Real Party in Interest. Docket No. 17800. Court of Appeals of California, Third District. November 17, 1978. *452 COUNSEL No

Opinion FRANSON, J. Statement of the Case On August 25, 1976, real party in interest United Farm Workers (UFW) filed an unfair labor practice charge against petitioner. Thereafter, a complaint was issued by the board’s regional director alleging that on or about August 11, 1976, petitioner “established, implemented and otherwise enforced a dis

WILLIAM B. SHUBB, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the court is plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction. (Docket No. 29.) The court held a hearing on the motion on February 20, 2018. I. Factual and Procedural History This case concerns a challenge to California's listing of glyphosate1 as a chemical known to the State of California to cause cancer, as w

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge D.H. GINSBURG. D.H. GINSBURG, Circuit Judge: Associations representing fruit growers in several eastern states filed suit, on behalf of themselves and their members, challenging the Secretary of Labor’s interpretation of the regulation establishing the minimum wage for foreign agricultural (H-2) workers. A

191 F.2d 642 DI GIORGIO FRUIT CORP. et al.v.NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD et al. No. 10605. United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit. Argued October 16, 1950. Decided June 21, 1951. Writ of Certiorari Denied November 5, 1951. See 72 S.Ct. 110.

HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”) petitions this court for enforcement of its order against Harvstone Manufacturing Corp. (“Harvstone”), Duray Fluorescent Manufacturing Co. (“Duray”), American Fluorescent Corp. (“American”) and House-O-Lite Corp. (“House-O-Lite”) (collectively the “Respondents”). This action arises out of unfair labor practice charges filed against the Respo

785 F.2d 570 121 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3371, 104 Lab.Cas. P 11,861 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,v.HARVSTONE MANUFACTURING CORP., Duray FluorescentManufacturing Co., American Fluorescent Corp. andHouse-O-Lite Corp., Respondents. No. 84-3116. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. Argued Sept. 10, 1985.Decid

RONAYNE KRAUSE, J. Plaintiff appeals by right the trial court’s dismissal of her claims on the ground that the trial court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction. We agree and affirm. Plaintiff is a teacher in the Novi Community School District and was a member of defendants, the Michigan Education Association (MEA) and the Novi Education Association, both of whic

I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document New Mexico Compilation Commission, Santa Fe, NM '00'04- 09:45:20 2013.04.15 Certiorari Granted, March 29, 2013, No. 34,010 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Numb

Filed 8/12/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA JAIME ZEPEDA LABOR D078062 CONTRACTING, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. PSC1705944) v. DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, DIVISION OF LABOR STANDARDS ENFORCEMENT,