⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “West v. HHS”

White v. Hhspublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2025-08-27 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 24-1372 Document: 37 Page: 1 Filed: 08/27/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ RONALD E. WHITE, Petitioner-Appellant v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent-Appellee ______________________ 2024-1372 ______________________ App
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024-07-15 · Published · cited 0×
Appellate Case: 24-6063 Document: 010111079171 Date Filed: 07/15/2024 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS July 15, 2024
District Court, District of Columbia · 2013-01-29 · Published · cited 0× · 919 F. Supp. 2d 34; 2013 WL 323228; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11320
MEMORANDUM OPINION GLADYS KESSLER, District Judge. Plaintiff, Catholic Healthcare West (“CHW”), brings this action against Defendant Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (respectively, the “Secretary” and “HHS”), pursuant to Title XVII of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1395 et seq.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014-04-11 · Published · cited 8× · 409 U.S. App. D.C. 202; 748 F.3d 351; 2014 WL 1394689; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 6662
WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge: Plaintiff Catholic Healthcare West (“CHW”), a non-profit Catholic hospital system, was the surviving entity after a merger between Marian Medical Center and the hospitals previously constituting CHW. Its claim here relates to depreciation taken by Marian in the years before the merger. CHW argues that the merger transaction revealed the inadequacy o
Burch v. Hhspublic domain
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2015-09-04 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 99-946V Filed: August 13, 2015 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To Be Published SHON SUMNER, for herself and on behalf of * her daughter, S.E.B., and JONATHAN BURCH, * Special Master Hamilton-Fieldman on his own behalf and on behalf of his daughter, *
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2026-06-30 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 25-60200 Document: 100-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/30/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED June 30, 2026 No. 25-60200
Massachusetts Superior Court · 2011-10-12 · Published · cited 1× · 29 Mass. L. Rptr. 77
Wilkins, Douglas H., J. In this appeal under G.L.c. 30A, §14, from a decision from the Director of the Office of Medicaid, Executive Office of Health and Human Services (“Director”), the plaintiff, West Boylston Nursing Home, Inc. d/b/a Oakdale Rehab & Skilled Nursing Center (“Nursing Home”) has filed a Plaintiffs Motion for Leave of Court to Present Testimony of Alleged Irregularity in Procedure Before the Agency Not Shown i
Cyril Korte v. HHSpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013-11-08 · Published · cited 373× · 735 F.3d 654; 2013 WL 5960692
ROVNER, Circuit Judge, dissenting. The court’s holding in these cases is as remarkable for its reasoning as for its result. The Kortes and the Grotes are business owners: Korte & Luitjohan Contractors is a construction firm, and Grote Industries manufactures motor vehicle turn signals, reflectors, emergency lighting, and other safety systems. Neither company has a declared religious purpose or mission. Bot
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2025-09-04 · Published · cited 0×
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 24-1820 ____________ BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB CO., Appellant v. SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; ADMINISTRATOR CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; CENTER
District Court, District of Columbia · 2015-10-30 · Published · cited 1× · 145 F. Supp. 3d 94; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147380; 2015 WL 6673703
MEMORANDUM OPINION Amit P. Mehta, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION As part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA” or “the Act”), all individual health insurance plans are required to comply with eight federally mandated market requirements, unless a plan qualifies for a “grandfathering” exception. Responsibility for the enforcement of these mark
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003-08-07 · Published · cited 0× · 339 F.3d 212
TRAXLER, Circuit Judge, concurring: I join with Judge Luttig insofar as he holds that the district court erred in determining that West Virginia’s provider tax was preempted by section 8909(f). I further agree that the case before us is readily distinguishable from Health Maint. Org. of New Jersey v. Whitman, 72 F.3d 1123 (3d Cir.1995), and Travelers Ins. Co. v. Cuomo, 14 F.3d 708 (2d Cir.1
District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2002-08-05 · Published · cited 0× · 238 F. Supp. 2d 751; 29 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1696; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22011; 2002 WL 31545865
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER HALLANAN, Senior District Judge. Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiff and Third Party Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiff and Third Party Defendants’ Memorandum of Law in Support of Their Motion for Summary Judgment. In response, Defen-dani/Third Party Plaintiff filed its Response to Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiff a
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016-12-15 · Published · cited 1× · 843 F.3d 1043; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 22321; 2016 WL 7321295
JERRY E.. SMITH, Circuit Judge: West Texas LTC Partners, Incorporated, doing business as Cedar Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center (“Cedar Man- or”), petitions for review of a final decision of the Departmental Appeals Board (“DAB”) of the U.S, Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”). Because the decision is neither arbitrary and capricious nor unsupported by sub
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011-07-06 · Published · cited 2× · 649 F.3d 217; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 13672; 2011 WL 2624178
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge DIAZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge MOTZ and Senior Judge HAMILTON joined. OPINION DIAZ, Circuit Judge: This appeal arises from a grant of summary judgment. The district court dismissed appellant’s challenge to an administrative ruling that sustained a disallowance in federal funding for it
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016-07-01 · Published · cited 1× · 423 U.S. App. D.C. 439; 827 F.3d 81; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 12123; 2016 WL 3568089
SILBERMAN, Senior Circuit Judge: This is rather an unusual case. West Virginia has sued to challenge the President’s determination not to enforce certain controversial provisions of the Affordable Care Act for a transitional period. That decision, implemented by a letter from the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, left the responsibility
HHS v. Smitleypublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003-10-20 · Published · cited 0×
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH &  HUMAN SERVICES, Plaintiff-Appellant, and GREAT LAKES HIGHER EDUCATION SERVICING CORPORATION, Agent for  No. 02-2056 Associated Bank, Plaintiff, v. ZANE TODD SMITLEY, Defendant-Appellee.  Appea
West v. Azarpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2020-12-23 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ARTHUR WEST, Plaintiffs, Vv. Case No. 1:20-cv-1726-RCL ALEX M. AZAR, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Arthur West sues the United States, the Department of Health and Human Services, the HHS Secretary, and the Center for Disease Control and Prevention over the federal government’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic. See First Am. Compl., ECF No. 2. Before the Court is the defendants’ motion [4] to dismiss the p
West v. Shalalapublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1993-06-07 · Published · cited 1× · 508 U.S. 962; 113 S. Ct. 2934
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
West v. Shalalapublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1993-06-07 · Published · cited 0× · 508 U.S. 962
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
State of WV v. HHSpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002-05-07 · Published · cited 0×
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA; DARRELL  V. MCGRAW, JR., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee,  and No. 01-1443 DONNA E. SHALALA SECRETARY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN S