Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Wendy Taylor Johnson”
Jacques Slocum v. Wendy Kelleypublic domain
SMITH, Circuit Judge. Jacques R. Slocum was convicted in Arkansas state court of second-degree murder, endangering the welfare of a minor, and fleeing. He was sentenced to 99 years’ imprisonment. After exhausting his state post-conviction relief remedies, he filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, alleging several claims of ineffective assistance
Shawn Rainer v. Wendy Kelleypublic domain
*1037 GRITZNER, District Judge. Shawn Rainer (Rainer) was convicted of second-degree murder following a jury trial in Arkansas state court and sentenced as a habitual offender to eighty years’ imprisonment. Rainer petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, arguing ineffective assist
Wendy Christine Williams v. State of Alaskapublic domain
Judge MANNHEIMER. Wendy Christine Williams was convicted of two counts of violating protective orders that prohibited her from contacting, communicating with, or stalking Kathleen Lansdale (the wife of Williams's former husband, Robert Lansdale) and the other members of the Lansdale family. See AS 11.56.740(a). One of Williams's convictions was
Taylor v. Chick-Fil-Apublic domain
The Full Commission reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner George Glenn, II, and the briefs and oral arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing party has not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence; receive further evidence; rehear the parties or their representatives; or amend the Opinion and Award. Accordingly, the Full Commission adopts and affirms the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner, as follows.
State v. Taylorpublic domain
OPINION PEAY, Judge. In January 1994, the defendant was indicted on two counts of aggravated rape, one *185count of attempt to commit aggravated rape and one count of coercion of a -witness. A jury trial commenced on February 7, 1994; however, the trial court sua sponte granted a mistrial after a juror informed the court that due to a se
William Hinesley, III v. Wendy Knightpublic domain
ROVNER, Circuit .Judge. Following a bench trial in Indiana state court, William Hinesley, III, was convicted of molesting his 13 year-old former foster daughter, V.V. After exhausting his state court remedies, Hinesley petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus, contending that his trial counsel deprived him of effective representation when he allowed the inculpato-ry out-of-court sta
Cite as 2020 Ark. 375 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-20-177 Opinion Delivered: November 19, 2020 KOREY RABION APPELLANT PRO SE APPEAL FROM THE LINCOLN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 40CV-20-13] V.
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. Jerry Taylor filed suit under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634, after he lost his job as a maintenance supervisor in the vending division at the Canteen Corporation (“Canteen”). He also brought a supplemental Illinois state law claim against Canteen alleging intentional breach of an oral employment contract. The distr
Houston Corey Grantham v. Julia Taylor Ginnpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2021-CA-01314-COA HOUSTON COREY GRANTHAM APPELLANT v. JULIA TAYLOR GINN APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/24/2021 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. KILEY CATLEDGE KIRK COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: CARROLL COUNTY CHANCERY COURT,
Addison-Taylor v. United Statespublic domain
ORDER RADER, Circuit Judge. The parties move to “dismiss this case and remand” for further proceedings, in view of this court’s recent decisions in Mudge v. United States, 308 F.3d 1220 (Fed.Cir.2002) and O’Connor v. United States, 308 F.3d 1233 (Fed.Cir.2002). This court cannot both dismiss and remand an appeal because those are mutually exclusive disposit
Echeverria v. Johnsonpublic domain
ADAMS, J.* *296INTRODUCTION This case is one of several coordinated suits in which the plaintiffs allege talcum powder products manufactured by Johnson & Johnson and Johnson &
Johnson v. Manitowoc Co.public domain
GARRETT, J. The claimant, Rhonda Johnson, appeals from a judgment dismissing her claims for workers' compensation benefits against her employer, Manitowoc Co., d/b/a Frymaster Co., and its insurer, Sentry Insurance, A Mutual Company. In written reasons, the workers' compensation judge ("WCJ") concluded that the claimant, who suffers from de Quervain's tenosynovitis ("DQT"), failed to prove that she suffered from an occupational dise
Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder Casespublic domain
Filed 7/9/19 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE JOHNSON & JOHNSON B286283 TALCUM POWDER CASES. JCCP No. 4872 (Los Angeles Super. Ct. ELISHA ECHEVERRIA, No. BC628228) as Trustee, etc., Plaintiff and Appellant, v.
Kelley v. Johnsonpublic domain
Cite as 2016 Ark. 268 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS CV-15-992 No. WENDY KELLEY, IN HER OFFICIAL Opinion Delivered: June 23, 2016 CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR, ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION; AND ARKANSAS APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT APPELLANTS [60CV-15-2921] V. HONORABL
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE October 14, 2011 Session WENDY LEVERETTE, ET AL. v. TENNESSEE FARMERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY Appeal from the Circuit Court for Maury County No. 0913135 Jim T. Hamilton, Judge No. M2011-00264-COA-R3-CV - Filed March 4, 2013 A woman who was severely injured in a collision with a
Taylor v. Statepublic domain
198 S.W.3d 636 (2006) Eddie L. TAYLOR, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent. No. 27501. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division One. August 18, 2006. *638 Mark A. Grothoff, Columbia, for appellant. Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Roger W. Johnson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for resp
Taylor v. Statepublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Alan C. Marin, J. *932This is the decision following the liability trial of the claim of Don Taylor brought under the Unjust Conviction and Imprisonment Act, which is section 8-b of the Court of Claims Act. Mr. Taylor had been convicted for the murder of Terrance Joyner on a Bronx street in the early hours of August 16, 1987.
Prowant v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'npublic domain
ORDER Amy Totenberg, United States District Judge Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration of Opt-Ins’ Claims [Doc. 57] is before the Court. Specifically, Defendant Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”) seeks to compel the arbitration of claims for nine individuals who consented to join this Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) case on April 15, 2016. Fannie Mae does not seek anew to compel
Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. Prowantpublic domain
ORDER AMY TOTENBERG, District Judge. This declaratory judgment action is before the Court on Plaintiff Federated Na*1316tional Mortgage, Association’s (“Fannie Mae”) Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 11]. The original claims were brought by Defendants under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq., in an arbitr
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-13-00414-CV WENDY KRITZER APPELLANT V. SCOTT E. KASDEN, M.D. AND APPELLEES SCOTT E. KASDEN, M.D., P.A. ---------- FROM THE 153RD DISTRICT COUR