Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Wells v. Ponder”
Thomas v. Ponderpublic domain
Opinion by Judge REINHARDT; Opinion by Judge FREIEDMAN. OPINION REINHARDT, Circuit Judge: Otis Thomas brought this suit seeking to establish that prison officials (individually and collectively “prison officials”) violated his Eighth Amendment rights by denying him outdoor exercise for 13 months and 25 days while he was in a maximum security
Ponder v. Ponderpublic domain
*46 TYSON, Judge. *302 Mark W. Ponder ("Defendant") appeals from three orders: one renewing a previously entered domestic violence protective order for an additional two years, a second "supplementi
People v. Ponderpublic domain
Filed 10/26/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, A166053 v. KALI PONDER (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. 617371) Defendant and Appellant.
People v. Ponderpublic domain
People v Ponder (2021 NY Slip Op 02880) People v Ponder 2021 NY Slip Op 02880 Decided on May 06, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431
People v. Ponderpublic domain
People v Ponder (2021 NY Slip Op 02880) People v Ponder 2021 NY Slip Op 02880 Decided on May 06, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431
Ponder v. Beenpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA19-1021 Filed: 31 December 2020 Mecklenburg County, No. 17-CVS-17308 MARK W. PONDER, Plaintiff, v. STEPHEN R. BEEN, Defendant. Appeal by defendant from order entered 29 October 2019 by Judge W. Robert Bell in Mecklenburg County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 11 August 2020. Sodoma Law, P.C., by Amy Elizabeth Simpson,
Ponder v. Ponderpublic domain
943 So.2d 716 (2006) David Charles PONDER, Appellant v. Leonila L. PONDER (Creekmoore), Appellee. No. 2005-CA-00354-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi. April 25, 2006. Rehearing Denied December 5, 2006. *717 George M. Mitchell, Eupora, attorney for appellant. Leonila L. Ponder, Creekmoore, Appellee, pro
John C. Ponder v. David R. Willeypublic domain
COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE PATRICIA W. GRIFFIN CHANCERY COURTHOUSE MASTER IN CHANCERY 34 The Circle GEORGETOWN, DELAWARE 19947 Final Report: November 17, 2020
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. GARY WAYNE PONDERpublic domain
08/10/2022 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 21, 2022 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. GARY WAYNE PONDER Appeal from the Criminal Court for DeKalb County No. 2017-CR-4 Gary McKenzie, Judge ___________________________________
Ponder v. Ponderpublic domain
571 S.E.2d 343 (2002) 275 Ga. 616 PONDER v. PONDER et al. Ponder et al. v. Ponder. Nos. S02A1209, S02X1210. Supreme Court of Georgia. October 15, 2002. *344 C. Truitt Martin, Jr., Dawson, Hall & Williamson, P.C., Michael C. Hall, Albany, for appellant. Lehman & Cauley, LLP, Thoma
Ponder v. Conwaypublic domain
748 F.Supp.2d 183 (2010) Dwayne PONDER, Petitioner, v. James T. CONWAY, Respondent. No. 06-CV-6579(VEB). United States District Court, W.D. New York. November 3, 2010. *186 Dwayne Ponder, Attica, NY, pro se. Loretta S. Courtney, Monroe County District Attorney's Office, Rochester, NY, for Respondent. DECISI
Ponder v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLCpublic domain
ORINDA D. EVANS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This case is presently before the Court on United States Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker's Non-Final Report and Recommendation ("R & R") [Doc. 64] in which she recommends that Defendant Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC's ("Ocwen") Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 54] be granted in part and denied in part. Defendant timely filed objections to the R & R [Doc. 69]. For the reasons stated below, De
Harang v. Ponderpublic domain
36 So.3d 954 (2010) Renee Michelle HARANG v. Jimmy PONDER. No. 2009 CU 2182. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. March 26, 2010. Writ Denied May 19, 2010. *958 Donald F. Harang, Jr., Larose, LA, for Plaintiff/2nd Appellant, Renee Michelle Harang. Robert P. Cuccia, Houma, LA, for Defendant/1st Appe
State of Tennessee v. Zackary James Earl Ponderpublic domain
08/21/2019 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs April 16, 2019 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ZACKARY JAMES EARL PONDER Appeal from the Circuit Court for Stewart County No. 2016-CR-85 David D. Wolfe, Judge No. M2018-00998-CCA-R3-CD The
David Ponder v. Statepublic domain
David Ponder v. Statepublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-09-352-CR DAVID PONDER APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE ------------ FROM COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT NO. 4
David Ponder v. Statepublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-09-352-CR DAVID PONDER APPELLANT V. <
City of Galena Park v. Barry Ponderpublic domain
OPINION Martha Hill Jamison, Justice This appeal concerns the validity of a petition seeking an election to amend the charter of the City of Galena Park, Texas. Appellants, the City of Galena Park and several city officials in their official capacities (collectively, at times, “Galena Park”), 1 cha
Cindy Ponder v. Carolyn W. Colvinpublic domain
PER CURIAM. Cindy Ponder appeals the district court’s 1 affirmance of an Administrative *1191 Law Judge’s (ALJ) denial of Ponder’s application for social security disability insurance benefi
Ponder v. Arkansas Department of Human Servicespublic domain
Josephine Linker Hart, Justice, dissenting. I respectfully dissent. The fact that the circuit judge has made what may well be a reasonable disposition of the minor children in this case does not make his decision legally correct. Nor does it excuse this court’s responsibility to preserve the rule of law.. As Justice Hugo Black stated, on