Cases

WINDHORST, J. Appellants/defendants, Terminix Service Co., Inc. and LUBA, appeal the judgment of the Workers' Compensation Judge ("WCJ") in favor of appellee/claimant, Rodney Loar. For the foregoing reasons, we affirm in part and reverse in part the judgment of the WCJ. Facts In December 2011, claimant was employed by Terminix as a technician. On December 10, 2011, claimant

HUDSON, Judge. Plaintiff filed suit alleging injuries resulting from an automobile crash. She contended defendant's negligence caused the wreck, which caused the injuries. Defendant admitted negligence and the jury awarded plaintiff $1.00 in damages. On 21 November 2002, the trial court entered a judgment which stated that "each party shall bear their own costs." Plaintiff then filed a motion for attorney's fees pursuant to N.C. Ge

TREVOR N. McFADDEN, United States District Judge Manuel J. Casares has filed a "claim" for "trespass (forgery), conspiracy[,] burglary, robbery, theft, false arrest, false imprisonment, *337battery, injury, damages[, and] failure to immediately return of property [sic]," naming numerous opposing parties, the first of which is Wells Fargo Bank,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT . FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MANUEL J. CESARES, Petitioner, V. Case No. l:18-cv-00044 (TNM) WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al, Respondents. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Manuel J. Cesares has filed a "claim" for "trespass (forgery), conspiracy[,] burglary, robbery,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MANUEL J. CASARES, Petitioner, "- Case No. 1;18-mc-00044 (TNM) wELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., er at, Respondents, MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Manuel J. Casares has filed a “claim" for “trespass (forgery), conspiracy[,] burglary, robbery, thefc, false arrest, false imprisonment, battery, injury, damages[, and] failure to immediately return of property [sic],” naming numerous opposing parties, the first of which is Wells Fargo Bank

264 Pa. Superior Ct. 398 (1979) 399 A.2d 1110 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Robert Earl LOAR, Appellant. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted April 10, 1978. Decided March 16, 1979. *401 D. Stephen Ferito, Pittsburgh, for appellant. W. Bertram Waychoff, District Attorney, and with him, James

Opinion of the Court PER Curiam: We granted review in this case to determine whether Article 38(b), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 838, had been complied with. The record reflects that, at'the outset, a pro forma inquiry was made to determine whether the accused had been advised of his rights concerning counsel as set forth in Article 38(b) of the Code. In United S

165 Cal.App.2d 765 (1958) THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. FREDERICK ARNOLD LOAR, Appellant. Crim. Nos. 6270, 6349. California Court of Appeals. Dec. 9, 1958. Daniel Paul Rikalo for Appellant. Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General, William E. James and Arthur C. de Goede, Deputy Attorneys General, for Respondent. WHITE, P. J. We are here confronted w

Affirming. John D. Caudill died on April 29, 1938, a resident of Pikeville in Pike County, at the age of 84 years. Considerably more than half a century before his death he married his first wife, and the fruits of that marriage were eight children. The mother of them died some forty years before the death of her surviving husband. Following the death of that wife Mr. Caudill married a second one, who bore him eight children, all of whom, as we gather from the record, survived their fa

McWhobtee, Judge: This was a suit in chancery brought by Wm. A. Loar against John Wilfong in the circuit court of Monongalia county for the purpose of enforcing specific performance of the following contract: “To William A. Loar: I hereby acknowledge that as part of the consideration of the deed made for 9 3-4 acres of coal on Flaggy Meadow Run, this day made

OPINION By ROBERTS, J. This cause is in this court on appeal from the Court, of Common Pleas. An effort will be made to present a succinct statement of the matters involved in this action and to elucidate therefrom, the real issues presented for consideration and determination. The issue so far as disputed is substantially this: Air effort on the part of the plaintiff to subject the ve

CHIEF JUSTICE WILLIAMS delivered the opinion oe toe court: Appellee was a Confederate soldier, and was sent into Kentucky, together with a small detachment of Confederate solders, under the command of Col. Jack May, who’ belonged to Brig. Gen. John S. Williams’ command, to. recruit soldiers, and mount them; and appellant was an officer in the Federal army at the same time, whose family resided in Floyd county, an

Opinion by Judge Hargis: The judgment is not void, but were this so the appeal should be dismissed, as no motion to set aside or modify it was made in the inferior court. Civ. Code (1876), § 763. The notice to the appellants, who were purchasers of the land sold under the former decree of the court, was intended and operated as a notice of the proceedings which were in the nature of a rule to compel appellan

Mr. Justice Wall delivered the opinion of the Court. The appellee recovered a judgment on verdict for $350 against the appellant for damages caused to premises by reason of a change in the grade of a street. The grade was raised so that, as alleged in the declaration, the drainage of the lot was obstructed; water from the street was caused to flow upon the lot and b

Filed 1/23/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Petitioner, A170818 v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF (Solano County SOLANO COUNTY, Super. Ct. Nos. FCR359342,

ORDER TERRENCE W. BOYLE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This cause comes before the Court on a motion to dismiss filed by State defendants [DE 49] and a motion to dismiss filed by defendant Friends of the Queen Anne’s Revenge. [DE 47]. The appropriate responses and replies have been filed and a hearing was held before the undersigned on November 2, 2016, in Edenton, North Carolina. For the, reasons

NO. 12-16-00214-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS RA’AN HENDERSON, § APPEAL FROM THE 396TH APPELLANT V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE § TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER LORETTA C. BIGGS, District Judge. Plaintiff Pathfinder Software, LLC (“Pathfinder”) brings this action against Defendant Core Cashless, LLC (“Core Cashless”), alleging common law trademark infringement; false designation of origin in violation of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a) (2012); and unfair and deceptive trade practices in violation of state statutes, N.C. Gen.Stat.

KENNETH S. HIXSON, Judge. |, Appellant George Willis brought a workers’ compensation claim against ap-pellee Great Dane Trailers, alleging that he sustained a compensable aggravation injury to his left knee while working for the appellee on August 9, 2012. The Workers’ Compensation Commission denied compensability, finding that Mr. Willis failed to prove

[Cite as State v. Williamson, 2019-Ohio-4380.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WOOD COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals Nos. WD-18-049 WD-18-051 Appellee/Cross-Appellant Trial Court No. 2016CR00