⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Wells Fargo Bank, N.C. v. Midkiff”

Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler) · 2020-05-06 · Published · cited 0×
NO. 12-19-00266-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS WAYNE GREUNKE, § APPEAL FROM THE APPELLANT V. § COUNTY COURT AT LAW BEAL BANK, SSB, APPELLEE § VAN ZANDT COUNTY, TEXAS
Hawaii Supreme Court · 2018-10-09 · Published · cited 72× · 143 Haw. 249; 428 P.3d 761
OPINION OF THE COURT BY McKENNA, J. I. Introduction This case returns to us after it was remanded to the Intermediate Court of Appeals ("ICA") by our February 28, 2017 opinion Bank of America, N.A. v. Reyes-Toledo , 139 Hawai'i 3
District Court, D. Hawaii · 2005-07-27 · Published · cited 1× · 381 F. Supp. 2d 1274; 57 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 909; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16619; 2005 WL 1866086
381 F.Supp.2d 1274 (2005) Walter L. BRANCO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. NORWEST BANK MINNESOTA, N.A., Etc., et al., Defendants. No. CV 02-00468 DAE-LEK. United States District Court, D. Hawai`i. July 27, 2005. *1275 *1276 Andrew S. Iwashita, Hilo Law Center, Hilo, HI, George J. Zweibel, Law Office
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007-06-05 · Published · cited 42× · 489 F.3d 1072; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 12943; 48 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 103; 2007 WL 1600429
HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from a decision by the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit (the BAP). 1 Jurisdiction in this court is conferred by 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). I One of the purposes of bankruptcy law is to provide fair remedies to credit
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2022-08-18 · Published · cited 0×
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-21-00330-CV ___________________________ ALLISON PUBLICATIONS, LLC, Appellant and Appellee V. JANE DOE, Appellee and Appellant
Hawaii Supreme Court · 2019-05-01 · Published · cited 16× · 443 P.3d 86
RECKTENWALD, C.J., NAKAYAMA, McKENNA, POLLACK, AND WILSON, JJ. OPINION OF THE COURT BY RECKTENWALD, C.J. *88 In 2006, Daniel Kaleoaloha Kanahele (Daniel) and his brother, Marcus C. Kanahele (Marcus), co-signed a mortgage on their property in order to obtain a $ 625,000 loan
Martin v. Evanspublic domain
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017-03-13 · Published · cited 11× · 241 F. Supp. 3d 276; 2017 WL 1015000
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Patti B. Saris, Chief United States District Judge Two civil rights activists bring an as-applied constitutional challenge to the Massachusetts Wiretap Statute, Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 272, § 99. The complaint, brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claims that Section 99, as applied to the secret recording of police officers engaged in their duties in public places, violates the First and Fourteen
HART v. Wardpublic domain
Hawaii Supreme Court · 2023-12-29 · Published · cited 0× · 153 Haw. 462
*** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER *** Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAP-XX-XXXXXXX 29-DEC-2023 10:52 AM Dkt. 89 OP IN THE SUPREM
District Court, D. Maryland · 2010-07-19 · Published · cited 2× · 268 F.R.D. 218; 77 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 144; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72147
*220 MEMORANDUM CATHERINE C. BLAKE, District Judge. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company (“Penn National”) has filed a declaratory judgment action in diversity against Wendy Perlberg and Ryan Leigh Realty (collectively the “Perlberg defendants”) with regard to its obligations under an insurance policy it issued to them.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015-05-29 · Published · cited 0× · 788 F.3d 779; 2015 WL 3429427
LOKEN, Circuit Judge. Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. (“Trinity Church”), filed this action alleging that Sara Pauley, acting in her official capacity as Director of the Missouri Department of Natural Resources (“DNR”), violated Trinity Church’s rights under the United States and Missouri Constitutions by denying its application for a grant of solid waste management funds to resurface a playground on church propert
District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2010-08-11 · Published · cited 4× · 740 F. Supp. 2d 788; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82176
740 F.Supp.2d 788 (2010) William W. CROYE and Cheryl Croye, Plaintiffs, v. GREENPOINT MORTGAGE FUNDING, INC., Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP, U.S. Bank, NA, and E*Trade Bank, Defendants. Civil Action No. 2:09-00048. United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, at Charleston. August 11, 2010. *789 Daniel F. Hedges, Char
Hawaii Supreme Court · 2015-11-23 · Published · cited 50× · 136 Haw. 227; 361 P.3d 454; 2015 Haw. LEXIS 313
Opinion of the Court by POLLACK, J. In Ulrich v. Security Investment Co., 35 Haw. 158 (Haw.Terr.1939), we held that a personal property mortgagee seeking to enforce a non-judicial foreclosure sale bears the burden of establishing that the sale was conducted in a manner that is fair, reasonably diligent, and in good faith and that
District Court, D. Maryland · 2015-02-03 · Published · cited 89× · 83 F. Supp. 3d 635; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12246; 2015 WL 452285
MEMORANDUM OPINION PAUL W. GRIMM, District Judge. Plaintiffs Adrienne Tucker and Maurice Holmes are facing foreclosure on their home. They failed to make payments under their original mortgage loan after they began making payments under what they believed to be a valid loan modification agreement. They filed suit in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County against their current loan servicer, D
Huszar v. Zelenypublic domain
District Court, E.D. New York · 2003-06-28 · Published · cited 4× · 269 F. Supp. 2d 98; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10910; 2003 WL 21487761
269 F.Supp.2d 98 (2003) Henry G. HUSZAR, Plaintiff, v. Victor ZELENY/Dorothy Courten ESq., Anthony M. Parlatore, Esq., Veronica J. Huszar "aka" Veronica J. Lackish c/o Dorothy A. Courten Esq., Marian H. Russo, Esq., and Edward M. Gould, Esq., Defendants. No. 02CV5111(ADS)ARL. United States District Court, E.D. New York. June 28, 2003. *
Ek v. Boggspublic domain
Hawaii Supreme Court · 2003-08-29 · Published · cited 22× · 75 P.3d 1180; 102 Haw. 289; 2003 Haw. LEXIS 410
75 P.3d 1180 (2003) 102 Hawai`i 289 William EK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Steven Eugene BOGGS and Sandy Boggs, Defendants-Appellees, and Doe Defendants 1-100, Defendants. No. 22798. Supreme Court of Hawai`i. August 29, 2003. *1182 William Ek, plaintiff-appellant, pro se. Norman K.K. Lau and Alliso
District Court, D. Vermont · 2012-07-12 · Published · cited 3× · 878 F. Supp. 2d 469; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96738; 2012 WL 2873664
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND PLAINTIFFS’ CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docs. 110, 114) CHRISTINA REISS, Chief Judge. This matter comes before the court on the motion for summary judgment filed by Defendant City of Barre, Vermont (the “City”) (Doc. 110) and the cross-motion for summary judgment filed by Plaintiff
Kachalsky v. Cacacepublic domain
District Court, S.D. New York · 2011-09-02 · Published · cited 6× · 817 F. Supp. 2d 235; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99837; 2011 WL 3962550
OPINION AND ORDER SEIBEL, District Judge. Before the Court are the Motion to Dismiss of Defendants Susan Cacace, Jeffrey A. Cohen, Albert Lorenzo, and Robert K. Holdman (the “State Defendants”), (Doc. 80);1 the Motion to Dismiss of Defendant County of Westchester (the “County”), (Doc. 33); the Motion for Summary Judgment of Plaintiffs Alan Kachalsky, Christina Nikolov, Eric De
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988-02-22 · Published · cited 9× · 840 F.2d 236; 1988 WL 12109
POWELL, Associate Justice: The dispositive issue presented in this case is whether the district court, 650 F.Supp. 1378 correctly concluded that appellants’ general partnership interests in Rivanna Trawlers Unlimited are not securities within the meaning of the federal securities laws. We hold that these interests are not securities, and affirm. The appellate record indicates that the Virginia general par
District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1986-12-23 · Published · cited 11× · 650 F. Supp. 1378; 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16097
650 F.Supp. 1378 (1986) RIVANNA TRAWLERS UNLIMITED, et al., Plaintiffs, v. THOMPSON TRAWLERS, INC., et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 84-0056(C). United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Charlottesville Division. December 23, 1986. *1379 Brian J. Donato, Edward B. Lowry, Michie, Hamlett, Donato & Lowry, Charlottesville, Va.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988-02-22 · Published · cited 85× · 840 F.2d 236; 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 2132
840 F.2d 236 56 USLW 2512, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,642 RIVANNA TRAWLERS UNLIMITED, a Virginia general partnership;Bruce H. Cabell; Waldemar G. Dahl; Joseph W. May; CharlesW. Miller; John R. Morris, Jr.; Mary M. Riviere; ColinRosse; Eleanor K. Spaar; Phil Speasmaker; Thomas L.Schildwachter; Wesley A. Volk; Joan Volk; Benjamin H.Word, Jr.; John K. Youel, Jr.; Donald T. Zimmerman,Plain