Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Wells Fargo Bank, N.C. v. Midkiff”
Wayne Greunke v. Beal Bank, SSBpublic domain
NO. 12-19-00266-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS WAYNE GREUNKE, § APPEAL FROM THE APPELLANT V. § COUNTY COURT AT LAW BEAL BANK, SSB, APPELLEE § VAN ZANDT COUNTY, TEXAS
Bank of America, N.A. v. Reyes-Toledo.public domain
OPINION OF THE COURT BY McKENNA, J. I. Introduction This case returns to us after it was remanded to the Intermediate Court of Appeals ("ICA") by our February 28, 2017 opinion Bank of America, N.A. v. Reyes-Toledo , 139 Hawai'i 3
Branco v. Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.public domain
381 F.Supp.2d 1274 (2005) Walter L. BRANCO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. NORWEST BANK MINNESOTA, N.A., Etc., et al., Defendants. No. CV 02-00468 DAE-LEK. United States District Court, D. Hawai`i. July 27, 2005. *1275 *1276 Andrew S. Iwashita, Hilo Law Center, Hilo, HI, George J. Zweibel, Law Office
Rupp v. United Security Bank (In Re Kunz)public domain
HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from a decision by the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit (the BAP). 1 Jurisdiction in this court is conferred by 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). I One of the purposes of bankruptcy law is to provide fair remedies to credit
Allison Publications, LLC v. Jane Doepublic domain
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-21-00330-CV ___________________________ ALLISON PUBLICATIONS, LLC, Appellant and Appellee V. JANE DOE, Appellee and Appellant
Nationstar Mortgage LLC v. Kanahele.public domain
RECKTENWALD, C.J., NAKAYAMA, McKENNA, POLLACK, AND WILSON, JJ. OPINION OF THE COURT BY RECKTENWALD, C.J. *88 In 2006, Daniel Kaleoaloha Kanahele (Daniel) and his brother, Marcus C. Kanahele (Marcus), co-signed a mortgage on their property in order to obtain a $ 625,000 loan
Martin v. Evanspublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Patti B. Saris, Chief United States District Judge Two civil rights activists bring an as-applied constitutional challenge to the Massachusetts Wiretap Statute, Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 272, § 99. The complaint, brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claims that Section 99, as applied to the secret recording of police officers engaged in their duties in public places, violates the First and Fourteen
HART v. Wardpublic domain
*** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER *** Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAP-XX-XXXXXXX 29-DEC-2023 10:52 AM Dkt. 89 OP IN THE SUPREM
*220 MEMORANDUM CATHERINE C. BLAKE, District Judge. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company (“Penn National”) has filed a declaratory judgment action in diversity against Wendy Perlberg and Ryan Leigh Realty (collectively the “Perlberg defendants”) with regard to its obligations under an insurance policy it issued to them.
Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Pauleypublic domain
LOKEN, Circuit Judge. Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. (“Trinity Church”), filed this action alleging that Sara Pauley, acting in her official capacity as Director of the Missouri Department of Natural Resources (“DNR”), violated Trinity Church’s rights under the United States and Missouri Constitutions by denying its application for a grant of solid waste management funds to resurface a playground on church propert
Croye v. Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc.public domain
740 F.Supp.2d 788 (2010) William W. CROYE and Cheryl Croye, Plaintiffs, v. GREENPOINT MORTGAGE FUNDING, INC., Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP, U.S. Bank, NA, and E*Trade Bank, Defendants. Civil Action No. 2:09-00048. United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, at Charleston. August 11, 2010. *789 Daniel F. Hedges, Char
Kondaur Capital Corporation v. Matsuyoshi.public domain
Opinion of the Court by POLLACK, J. In Ulrich v. Security Investment Co., 35 Haw. 158 (Haw.Terr.1939), we held that a personal property mortgagee seeking to enforce a non-judicial foreclosure sale bears the burden of establishing that the sale was conducted in a manner that is fair, reasonably diligent, and in good faith and that
Tucker v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION PAUL W. GRIMM, District Judge. Plaintiffs Adrienne Tucker and Maurice Holmes are facing foreclosure on their home. They failed to make payments under their original mortgage loan after they began making payments under what they believed to be a valid loan modification agreement. They filed suit in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County against their current loan servicer, D
Huszar v. Zelenypublic domain
269 F.Supp.2d 98 (2003) Henry G. HUSZAR, Plaintiff, v. Victor ZELENY/Dorothy Courten ESq., Anthony M. Parlatore, Esq., Veronica J. Huszar "aka" Veronica J. Lackish c/o Dorothy A. Courten Esq., Marian H. Russo, Esq., and Edward M. Gould, Esq., Defendants. No. 02CV5111(ADS)ARL. United States District Court, E.D. New York. June 28, 2003. *
Ek v. Boggspublic domain
75 P.3d 1180 (2003) 102 Hawai`i 289 William EK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Steven Eugene BOGGS and Sandy Boggs, Defendants-Appellees, and Doe Defendants 1-100, Defendants. No. 22798. Supreme Court of Hawai`i. August 29, 2003. *1182 William Ek, plaintiff-appellant, pro se. Norman K.K. Lau and Alliso
Brown v. City of Barrepublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND PLAINTIFFS’ CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docs. 110, 114) CHRISTINA REISS, Chief Judge. This matter comes before the court on the motion for summary judgment filed by Defendant City of Barre, Vermont (the “City”) (Doc. 110) and the cross-motion for summary judgment filed by Plaintiff
Kachalsky v. Cacacepublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER SEIBEL, District Judge. Before the Court are the Motion to Dismiss of Defendants Susan Cacace, Jeffrey A. Cohen, Albert Lorenzo, and Robert K. Holdman (the “State Defendants”), (Doc. 80);1 the Motion to Dismiss of Defendant County of Westchester (the “County”), (Doc. 33); the Motion for Summary Judgment of Plaintiffs Alan Kachalsky, Christina Nikolov, Eric De
POWELL, Associate Justice: The dispositive issue presented in this case is whether the district court, 650 F.Supp. 1378 correctly concluded that appellants’ general partnership interests in Rivanna Trawlers Unlimited are not securities within the meaning of the federal securities laws. We hold that these interests are not securities, and affirm. The appellate record indicates that the Virginia general par
650 F.Supp. 1378 (1986) RIVANNA TRAWLERS UNLIMITED, et al., Plaintiffs, v. THOMPSON TRAWLERS, INC., et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 84-0056(C). United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Charlottesville Division. December 23, 1986. *1379 Brian J. Donato, Edward B. Lowry, Michie, Hamlett, Donato & Lowry, Charlottesville, Va.
840 F.2d 236 56 USLW 2512, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,642 RIVANNA TRAWLERS UNLIMITED, a Virginia general partnership;Bruce H. Cabell; Waldemar G. Dahl; Joseph W. May; CharlesW. Miller; John R. Morris, Jr.; Mary M. Riviere; ColinRosse; Eleanor K. Spaar; Phil Speasmaker; Thomas L.Schildwachter; Wesley A. Volk; Joan Volk; Benjamin H.Word, Jr.; John K. Youel, Jr.; Donald T. Zimmerman,Plain