Cases

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA No. 81007 RALPH STEPHEN COPPOLA, TRUSTEE OF THE .R.S. COPPOLA musT DATED OCTOBER 19, 1995, AS Ft MOST RECENTLY AMENDED ON SEPTEMBER 13, 2001, SEP 2 8 2022

By the Court, CADISH, J.: *847In SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. U.S . Bank, N.A., 130 Nev. 742, 334 P.3d 408

135 Nev., Advance Opinion 30 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA DAISY TRUST, No. 72747 Appellant, vs. FILE WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Respondent. JUL 2 5 2019

ORDER RE DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Re: Dkt. No. 38 Donna M. Ryu, United States Magistrate Judge Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Defendant” or “Wells Fargo”) moves the court to dismiss Plaintiff Robert Mulhall’s (“Plaintiff’) Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12

James H. Payne, United States District Judge, Eastern District of Oklahoma Before this Court are (1) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. 41), (2) Defendants' Motion for Leave to File Judgment Rolls (Dkt. 42), (3) Plaintiff's "Motion for Leave to Amend Its Second Amended Complaint" (Dkt. 46), (4) Plaintiff's "Emergency Motion for a Evidentiary Hearing for a Temporary Restraining Order or Preliminary Injunctio

*103 MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge Plaintiff Terry Walter Conant (“Conant” or “Plaintiff’) brings this action pro se challenging the foreclosure of his property. Presently before the Court is the portion of Defendant Wel

MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge Plaintiff Terry Walter Conant (“Conant” or “Plaintiff”) brings this action pro se challenging the foreclosure of his property. Presently before the Court are motions by several Defendants for dismissal of this lawsuit. Also before the Court are several motions by Plai

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA S&J INVESTMENTS, LLC, A NEVADA No. 76188 LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; JOHN WHITEHOUSE, AN INDIVIDUAL; AND SANDY WHITEHOUSE, AN INDIVIDUAL, Appellants, vs. JAN 3 liE0 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., A

JOY COSSICH LOBRANO, Judge. | ¶Plaintiff, Ronald Anthony Bruzeau, appeals the trial court judgment1 of September 2, 2010, insofar as it grants the exceptions of no cause of action and no right of action filed by defendant, Aaron Brous-sard, and dismisses Mr. Broussard from this lawsuit. On May 10, 2010, plaintiffs, Judy2 and Ronald Bruzeau, filed a

JAMES C. MAHAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Presently before the court is defendant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC et al.'s ("SFR") motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 67). Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo") filed a response (ECF No. 71), to which SFR replied (ECF No. 73). Also before the court is Wells Fargo's motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 68). SFR filed a response (ECF No. 70), to which Wells

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO EXCLUDE EXPERT, AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO CERTIFY CLASS ACTION ROBERT N. SCOLA, JR., District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the on the QBE Defendants’ Motions to Exclude Expert Witness Briny Birnbaum (ECF Nos. 142 & 150), and the Plaintiffs Corrected *669Motion for Class

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA SATICOY BAY LLC SERIES 9004 No. 78539 SPOTTED TRAIL AVENUE, Appellant, VS. FILE WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., NOV 1 3 2020 Res ondent. A. BROWN REME COURT

OPINION BYBEE, Circuit Judge: Eric Mwangi and Pauline Mwicharo (collectively “the Debtors”) were account holders at Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. When Wells Fargo discovered that the Debtors had filed a voluntary Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition, it placed a “temporary administrative pledge” on the Debtors’ accounts. Wells Fargo then requested instructions from

*1267ORDER JAMES C. MAHAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Presently before the court is counter-claimants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s (“Wells Fargo”), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation’s (“Freddie Mac”), and Federal Housing Finance Agency’s (“FHFA” and collectively with Wells Fargo and Freddie Mac, “defendants”) motion for summary judgment. (ECF N

ORDER PHILIP M. PRO, District Judge. This case is one of many similar disputes over whether a foreclosure sale conducted by a homeowners’ association (“HOA”) to collect unpaid HOA assessments extinguishes all junior liens, including a first deed of trust. Presently before the Court are the following motions: 1. Defendant MTC Financial Ine.’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 37), filed on

OPINION PHILIP M. PRO, District Judge. Presently before the Court is Appellants Eric Mwangi and Pauline Mwicharo’s appeal of the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing with prejudice their adversary proceeding against Appellant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. I. BACKGROUND The following factual background is derived largely from the statement of facts as recited by t

432 B.R. 812 (2010) In re Eric MWANGI and Pauline Mwicharo, Debtors. Eric Mwangi; Pauline Mwicharo, Appellants, v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Appellee. BAP No. NV-09-1408-DHPa. Bankruptcy No. 09-24057-BAM. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted on June 16, 2010. Decided June 30, 2010.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., No. 18-17320 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:17-cv-01469- JCM-VCF MAHOGANY MEADOWS AVENUE TRUST, Defendant-Appellee, OPINION and COPPER CREEK HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION; HAMPTON & HAMPTON CO

OPINION KIRSCHER, Bankruptcy Judge. We are asked to determine whether a third-party source for recovery on a creditor’s unsecured claim, such as a guarantor, is a factor the bankruptcy court may consider when determining whether claims are substantially similar under 11 U.S.C. § 1122(a). 2 We co

HIGGINBOTHAM, J. ¶ 1. These are appeals of a circuit court order approving a rehabilitation plan of the segregated account of Ambac Assurance Corporation (Ambac) and other court orders entered earlier in this proceeding.2 Numerous interested parties challenge the validity of various provisions of the rehabilitation plan on various grounds as well as actions taken by the Office of the Commissioner of I