Cases

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BESOSA, District Judge. At the close of plaintiffs’ evidence at trial, defendants Dr. Edgar A. Cardona, his legal partnership, SIMED as his insurer, and Hospital Ryder Memorial, Inc. (collectively, “defendants”) argued a motion for judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(a). (Docket No. 107.) The Court granted the motion only in part, denying the motion

870 A.2d 499 (2005) WEINSTEIN ENTERPRISES, INC., Defendant Below, Appellant, v. George D. ORLOFF, Plaintiff Below, Appellee. No. 257, 2004. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: January 7, 2005. Decided: March 21, 2005. William O. LaMotte, III (argued), Kenneth J. Nachbar, James G. McMillan, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, Wilmington, DE, for

367 F.Supp.2d 413 (2005) Steven D. DREYER and Roberta M. Dreyer, Plaintiffs, v. RYDER AUTOMOTIVE CARRIER GROUP, INC., Ryder Automotive Operations, Inc. d/b/a Delavan, Delavan Industries, Inc., Ryder System, Inc. and Ryder Automotive Carrier Services, Inc., Defendants. No. 98-CV-0082A. United States District Court, W.D. New York. April 14, 2005.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marilyn Shafer, J.), entered May 13, 2004, which denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on a theory of account stated, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $40,399.24, with statutory interest from March 12, 2003. Defendant retained plaintiff law firm to render services with regard

Following an accident in December 1979 in Queens County, plaintiffs Belinda and Charles Bingham and Allegra Warren attempted service on the nonresident operator defendant Wayne Peredoe pursuant to Vehicle and Traffic Law § 253. The Binghams’ process was returned marked “Addressee Moved — No Forwarding Address”. Warren’s process was accepted seven months later at the same address by one other than Peredoe. Answers were interposed on behalf of Peredoe by th

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review a determination of the New York State Board of Parole which denied the petitioner his release on parole, the appeal, as limited by the *892appellant’s brief, is from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Delaney, J.), dated September 8, 1981, as granted the application to the extent of directing a “new

Case held, decision reserved, and matter remitted to the Trial Judge for further proceedings in accordance with the memorandum. Memorandum: This matter was remitted to the trial court for the purpose of fixing the amount of each element of damage (Chisholm-Ryder Co. v. State of New York, 21 A D 2d 748). This has been done.by a supplemental decision. An allowance of $18,491.78 was made for reimbursement of taxes which was agreed upon by the

684 F.2d 1301 11 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 875 In re AIRCRASH IN BALI, INDONESIA ON APRIL 22, 1974John P. CAUSEY, Jr., etc., et al., Plaintiffs-Designated Appellants,v.PAN AMERICAN WORLD AIRWAYS, INC., etc.,Defendants-Designated Appellees.Simone RYDER, etc., et al., Plaintiffs-Designated Appellants,v.PAN AMERICAN WORLD AIRWAYS, INC., etc.,Defendants-Designated Appellees.Margaret G. JOHNS, e

RYDER, Acting Chief Judge. John Stroud, by his mother and legal guardian, Pennelope Schuette, seeks review *647of a summary final judgment entered against him in his negligence action against the driver and owner of a pickup truck which collided with him while he was crossing Ulmerton Road. There were several witnesses to the accident. Given the number of witnesses an

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Bankers Ins. Co. v. Macias, 475 So.2d 1216 (Fla.1985).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MICHAEL KIMELMAN, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 21-675 (TJK) MERRICK B. GARLAND et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Michael Kimelman was convicted of federal securities fraud in 2011. He now lives in New York and wants to purchase and possess firea

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Florida Real Estate Commission v. Webb, 367 So.2d 201 (Fla.1978); Lash, Inc. v. State, Department of Business Regulation, 411 So.2d 276 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); § 120.68(10) and § 120.68(12), Fla.Stat. (1979). OTT, C.J., and RYDER and DANAHY, JJ., concur.

FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT DECEMBER 17, 2020 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT DECEMBER 17, 2020 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING OR CLARIFICATION PER CURIAM. Appellee Savers seeks to have our December 2,1987, opinion clarified to indicate *26that we were not ruling that jurisdiction was improper over appellant under each and every provision of Florida’s long-arm statute. As stated in our opinion, the trial court's order denying appellant's motion to d

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC15-1305 ____________ THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, vs. ARTURO DOPAZO, III, Respondent. [October 5, 2017] PER CURIAM. We have for review a referee’s report recommending that Respondent, Arturo Dopazo, III, be found

645 F.Supp. 963 (1984) Peter G. HOLMSTROM, Plaintiff, v. COASTAL INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Defendants. No. C80-670A. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, E.D. March 6, 1984. On Motion for Summary Judgment November 29, 1984. On Motion to Withdraw Jury Demand October 23, 1986. Marvin L. Karp, Cleveland, Ohio, Robert B. Block, Pome

Billings, Thomas P., J. The defendant is charged with being an accessory before the fact to armed masked robbery (four counts) and with conspiracy to commit armed masked robbery. The charges stem from the December 26, 2010 robbery of the jewelry counter in the Kohl’s department store in Woburn. The robber was the defendant’s brother Dominic Cinelli, who subsequently died in an exchange of gunfire with Woburn police officer John

Opinion by JUDGE BERNARD *909¶ 1 If a lawyer enters into a contract with a client that violates Colo. RPC 1.8(a), one of the Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct, can the attorney later enforce the contract against the client? Appellate courts in Colorado have not previously addressed this question. We conclude that the answer to this questio

Colorado Court of Appeals Opinions || April 21, 2016 Colorado Court of Appeals -- April 21, 2016 2016 COA 60. No. 14CA1559. Calvert v. Mayberry. COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS 2016 COA 60 Court of Appeals No. 14CA1559 City and County of Denver D