⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Wei Cheng”

Wilson v. Wei Chengpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012-09-12 · Published · cited 0× · 98 A.D.3d 971; 950 N.Y.S.2d 574
— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bayne, J.), dated December 16, 2011, which denied his motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. On June 11, 2010, a vehicle owned and operated by the plaintiff and a vehicle operated by the defendant Wei Cheng, and owned by the defen
Wilson v. Wei Chengpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012-09-12 · Published · cited 1× · 98 A.D.3d 971; 950 N.Y.S.2d 574
— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bayne, J.), dated December 16, 2011, which denied his motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. On June 11, 2010, a vehicle owned and operated by the plaintiff and a vehicle operated by the defendant Wei Cheng, and owned by the defen
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001-11-19 · Published · cited 29× · 288 A.D.2d 378; 733 N.Y.S.2d 471; 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11191
—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for legal malpractice, (1) the plaintiffs appeal (a) from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leviss, J.H.O.), entered April 14, 2000, (b) from stated portions of an amended judgment of the same court entered May 2, 2000, (c) from stated portions of an order of the same court dated May 23, 2000, (d), as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the same court, also dated May 23, 20
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015-12-14 · Published · cited 2× · 150 F. Supp. 3d 71; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166888; 2015 WL 8751235
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CASPER, United States District Judge I.Introduction Plaintiffs Xiao Wei Yang Catering Linkage in Inner Mongolia Co., LTD. (“Xiao Wei Yang Catering-China”) and Fei Xie (“Xie”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) have filed this lawsuit against Defendants Inner Mongolia Xiao Wei Yang USA, Inc., d/b/a Xiao Wei Yang and/or Little Lamb Restaurant (“Inner Mongolia USA”), Cheng Xu (“
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995-03-27 · Published · cited 2× · 213 A.D.2d 581; 624 N.Y.S.2d 268; 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3222
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., *582the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Baisley, J.), entered December 3, 1992, as, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the complaint insofar as it is asserted against the defendant Long Island Rail Road. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofa
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009-10-21 · Published · cited 0× · 349 F. App'x 645
SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Zhang Cheng, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a December 19, 2008 order of the BIA denying his motion to reopen. In re Zhang Cheng, No. A073 133 454 (B.I.A. Dec. 19, 2008). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history in this case. We review the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of d
District Court, District of Columbia · 2018-09-20 · Published · cited 2× · 340 F. Supp. 3d 70
CASPER, J. I. Introduction Plaintiffs Xiao Wei Yang Catering Linkage in Inner Mongolia Co., LTD. ("Linkage") and Fei Xie ("Xie") (collectively, "Plaintiffs") have filed this lawsuit against Defendants Inner Mongolia Xiao Wei Yang USA, Inc., d/b/a Xiao Wei Yang and/or Little Lamb Restaurant ("Xiao Wei USA"), Cheng Xu ("Xu") and Yonghua Qin ("Qin") (collectively, "Defendants"). D.1. The Court previous
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009-10-21 · Published · cited 0× · 349 F. App'x 645
SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Zhang Cheng, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a December 19, 2008 order of the BIA denying his motion to reopen. In re Zhang Cheng, No. A073 133 454 (B.I.A. Dec. 19, 2008). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history in this case. We review the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of d
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009-04-20 · Published · cited 0× · 323 F. App'x 46
SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Whei Cheng, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a September 13, 2007 order of the BIA denying his motion to reopen. In re Whei Cheng, No. A72 328 *47135 (B.I.A. Sept. 13, 2007). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history in this case. We revie
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009-07-07 · Published · cited 0× · 336 F. App'x 57
SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Ai Xim Cheng, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a July 2, 2008 order of the BIA denying her motion to reopen. In re Ai Xim Cheng, No. A076 993 815 (B.I.A. July 2, 2008). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history in this case. We review the agency’s denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discreti
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009-11-18 · Published · cited 0× · 353 F. App'x 579
SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Peng Cheng Lin, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of an October 3, 2007 order of the BIA denying his motion to reopen. In re Peng Cheng Lin, No. A073 556 201 (B.I.A. Oct. 3, 2007). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history in this case. We re-view the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen for abuse
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009-11-18 · Published · cited 0× · 353 F. App'x 579
SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Peng Cheng Lin, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of an October 3, 2007 order of the BIA denying his motion to reopen. In re Peng Cheng Lin, No. A073 556 201 (B.I.A. Oct. 3, 2007). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history in this case. We re-view the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen for abuse
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009-07-07 · Published · cited 0× · 336 F. App'x 57
SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Ai Xim Cheng, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a July 2, 2008 order of the BIA denying her motion to reopen. In re Ai Xim Cheng, No. A076 993 815 (B.I.A. July 2, 2008). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history in this case. We review the agency’s denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discreti
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009-04-20 · Published · cited 0× · 323 F. App'x 46
SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Whei Cheng, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a September 13, 2007 order of the BIA denying his motion to reopen. In re Whei Cheng, No. A72 328 *47135 (B.I.A. Sept. 13, 2007). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history in this case. We revie
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012-01-06 · Published · cited 54× · 665 F.3d 1226; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 229; 2012 WL 28950
SILER, Circuit Judge. Zhi Wei Pang, a/k/a Zhi Wei Pan, illegally entered the United States in 1993 from his native country of the People’s Republic of China. Just months after his arrival he applied for asylum, withholding of removal under the Immigration and Nationality Act and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). He claims he suffered economic and emotional persecution due to his resistance to Chinese populat
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006-06-21 · Published · cited 0× · 186 F. App'x 121
SUMMARY ORDER Ming Jie Cheng, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, petitions for review of the December 2003 decision of the BIA, affirming Immigration Judge (“D”) Elizabeth Lamb’s denial of his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and procedural history of this case. This Court reviews the denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion.
District Court, District of Columbia · 2021-05-24 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WEI LAI DEVELOPMENT LLC, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 21-887 (RDM) U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Wei Lai-USA, a Washington State limited liability company engaged in th
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2022-08-01 · Published · cited 0×
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion Filed August 1, 2022 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00174-CV WEI SHAO HEIRONIMUS, DERIVATIVELY ON BEHALF OF MID- AMERICAN SUPPLY CORP., Appellant V. XIAOSHA TIAN, Appellee On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021-01-28 · Published · cited 0× · 190 A.D.3d 661; 136 N.Y.S.3d 736; 2021 NY Slip Op 00516
Volpe v Munoz & Assoc., LLC (2021 NY Slip Op 00516) Volpe v Munoz & Assoc., LLC 2021 NY Slip Op 00516 Decided on January 28, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bu
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009-08-18 · Published · cited 0× · 342 F. App'x 698
SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Yan Guang Cheng, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a November 28, 2007 order of the BIA denying his motion to reopen. In re Yan GUang Cheng, No. A078 279 123 (B.I.A. Nov. 28, 2007). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history in this case. We review the agency’s denial of a motion to reopen for