⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Webb v. Parris”

Harnett v. Parrispublic domain
District Court, D. Kansas · 1996-04-24 · Published · cited 2× · 925 F. Supp. 1496; 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6670; 1996 WL 254179
925 F.Supp. 1496 (1996) John HARNETT, individually d/b/a Shamrock Greyhounds, Plaintiff, v. Carol J. PARRIS, Bob Parris, Carol Ann Long, and The National Greyhound Association, Defendants. No. 94-4251-SAC. United States District Court, D. Kansas. April 24, 1996. *1497 *1498
Bilodeau v. Webbpublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2005-08-22 · Published · cited 8× · 170 S.W.3d 904; 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 6789; 2005 WL 2000779
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 906 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 907 OPINION In this case, the underlying dispute arose subsequent to entry of a settlement
Dale v. Webb Corp.public domain
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003-03-24 · Published · cited 0× · 252 F. Supp. 2d 186; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4803; 2003 WL 1571854
252 F.Supp.2d 186 (2003) Julius DALE, Jr., Plaintiff, v. WEBB CORPORATION, Reed Equipment Division, Defendant. No. CIV.A. 02-1109. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. March 24, 2003. *187 Richard M. Jurewicz, Galfand Berger, LLP, Philadelphia, PA, for Julius Dale, Jr., Plaintiff. Thomas E. Tyler, Davis, Riter,
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2019-06-25 · Published · cited 0×
06/25/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs May 1, 2019 ASATA D LOWE v. MIKE PARRIS ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Blount County No. L-19878 David Reed Duggan, Judge ___________________________________
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2026-01-29 · Published · cited 0× · 2026 Ark. 5; 2026 Ark. 57
Cite as 2026 Ark. 57 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-24-786 Opinion Delivered: January 29, 2026 KENT PARRIS APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE ARKANSAS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT V. [NO. 01DCR-22-133] STATE OF ARKANSAS HONORABLE DONNA GALLOWAY,
Davis v. Parrispublic domain
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2011-05-16 · Published · cited 0× · 710 S.E.2d 757; 289 Ga. 201; 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 1503; 2011 Ga. LEXIS 382
710 S.E.2d 757 (2011) DAVIS v. PARRIS et al. No. S11A0374. Supreme Court of Georgia. May 16, 2011. *758 Charles A. Tingle, Lawrenceville, for appellant. Caldwell & Watson, Harry W. MacDougald, Floyd Ernest Propst III, Atlanta, Tracy S. Drake, Lawrenceville, for appellees. BENHAM, Justice. In January 1980,
Parris v. Statepublic domain
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003-03-21 · Published · cited 6× · 885 So. 2d 813; 2001 WL 996295
885 So.2d 813 (2001) Brent Andre PARRIS v. STATE of Alabama. No. CR-00-0406. Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama. August 31, 2001. Opinion on Return to Remand November 22, 2002. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing March 21, 2003. *820 Marcus W. Reid, Anniston, for appellant. William H. Pry
Webb v. Statepublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 1985-06-26 · Published · cited 18× · 695 S.W.2d 676; 1985 Tex. App. LEXIS 12106
STEPHENS, Justice. On appeal from his conviction for driving while intoxicated, appellant presents three grounds of error, all of which are directed to the legality of his arrest. He contends that the roadblock at which he was stopped, and subsequently arrested, was not in fact a valid driver’s license check authorized under TEX.REV.CIV.STAT.ANN. art. 6687b, § 13 (Vernon Supp.1985), and thus was unreasonable; that the roadblo
Webb v. Statepublic domain
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009-05-12 · Published · cited 1× · 971 A.2d 949; 185 Md. App. 580; 2009 Md. App. LEXIS 60
971 A.2d 949 (2009) 185 Md. App. 580 Deron Maurice WEBB v. STATE of Maryland. No. 2711, September Term, 2007. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. May 12, 2009. *950 Emily L. Levenson (Renee M. Hutchins, Nancy Forster, Public Defender on the brief), Baltimore, for appellant. Brenda Gruss (Douglas F
Webb v. Watkinspublic domain
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007-02-01 · Published · cited 9× · 641 S.E.2d 611; 283 Ga. App. 385; 2007 Fulton County D. Rep. 294; 2007 Ga. App. LEXIS 66
641 S.E.2d 611 (2007) WEBB v. WATKINS. No. A06A2178. Court of Appeals of Georgia. February 1, 2007. *612 Celeste F. Brewer, Atlanta, for appellant. Sonya Watkins, pro se. MILLER, Judge. Following a contempt hearing upon the application of Sonya Watkins, the trial court entered an order finding Rodney P. Webb
Idaho Supreme Court · 1952-03-11 · Published · cited 0× · 72 Idaho 387; 241 P.2d 1177; 1952 Ida. LEXIS 185
GIVENS, Chief Justice. Appellants’ amended complaint sufficiently alleged, in essence, the status and relationship of the parties, the relative position and geography of respondent Company’s tracks and the intersecting streets and highways • in Shoshone, extent of the respective travel thereon, extent of asserted hazards, and: “X. “That on the 27th day of March
Supreme Court of Kansas · 1921-02-12 · Published · cited 0× · 108 Kan. 330; 195 P. 879; 1921 Kan. LEXIS 41
The opinion of the court was delivered by Mason, J.: On January 24, 1916, William Parris (his wife joining) executed an oil and gas lease one of the provisions of which was to the effect that if a well should not be commenced on the premises within one year the rights of the lessee should cease unless he should pay an annual rental of $1 an acre to the lessor or deposit that amount to his credit in the Citizen’
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898-07-30 · Published · cited 8× · 54 P. 448; 7 Okla. 198; 1898 OK 99; 1898 Okla. LEXIS 21
Opinion of the court by This case, No. 523, and case No. 526, although brought to this court, docketed, argued, and submitted as distinct cases, are, in fact, cross-appeals from the same judgment. The principal question presented and argued arose upon the action of the court below in overruling the demurrer to the petition of the plaintiff. The demurrer presented the question of the authority of a county board of equalization, in equalizing assessments between the several townships of the cou
State v. Parrispublic domain
Supreme Court of Missouri · 1914-06-23 · Published · cited 0× · 259 Mo. 435; 168 S.W. 629; 1914 Mo. LEXIS 90
ROY, C. The defendant was charged with rape in an information against him, Elmer Loyd, Charles *436Middleton, Ora Robinson, Charles Dunn, William Brewer, Lemro Kelly and Arthur Parris. There was a severance. Defendant was convicted and sentenced to five years in the penitentiary. It is alleged that the offense occurred on October 19, 1912. The prosecutrix, Lily Mullane, w
Bangle v. . Webbpublic domain
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941-11-26 · Published · cited 8× · 17 S.E.2d 613; 220 N.C. 423; 1941 N.C. LEXIS 554
Motion to vacate purported service of summons upon defendant Cleve Webb. Service upon this defendant was sought in an action to recover damages for a personal injury to plaintiff alleged to have been caused 14 September, 1940, by the negligence of Webb and others. Personal service of summons and complaint was had on defendant Webb in Mecklenburg County, 24 January, 1941. Defendant Webb objected to the service and protested that he was not amenable to service, for the reason that he was a resi
Webb v. Scottpublic domain
Supreme Court of Florida · 1936-12-22 · Published · cited 44× · 176 So. 442; 129 Fla. 111
L.T. Webb and Stella E. Webb, his wife, brought their bill of complaint against Robert Scott praying that he be enjoined from instituting suit to foreclose paving certificate No. 717 issued by the Board of County Commissioners of Hillsborough County, or from transferring it, pending determination of its validity; that it be cancelled as a cloud on complainants' title to Lot 18, Block 9, Nearbay Subdivision; that defendant and all those claiming under him since the institution of this suit be
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914-11-25 · Published · cited 11× · 83 S.E. 568; 167 N.C. 483; 1914 N.C. LEXIS 153
This is an action against the defendant to recover damages for delay in delivering a telegram, alleged to have been caused by its negligence. Plaintiff on 8 July, 1911, filed with defendant's operator at Morehead City, N.C. a message addressed to William Faucette, a hackman at Hillsboro, N.C. and of which the following is a copy: "Leaving Morehead this evening; meet me tonight sure." He informed the operator at Morehead City that "he must be sure to get it off at once, as he, the plaintiff, w
Supreme Court of Missouri · 1850-01-15 · Published · cited 0× · 13 Mo. 89
RYLAHD, J. Prom the above statement, the only point for the adjudication of this court, is the judgment of the Circuit Court in sustaining the defendant’s demurrer to the plaintiff’s petition. We are of the opinion that the Circuit Court committed error in sustaining the defendant’s demurrer. The only objection on the record appears to be, the abbreviation of the Christian name of McElhenon. The petition sets forth his full name o
New York Court of Appeals · 1872-05-21 · Published · cited 8× · 49 N.Y. 420
Folgeb, J. I think that the question whether the defendant was negligent in kindling the fire, was properly left to the jury to decide. It is true that employees of the defendant who were called as witnesses, did testify with more or less-positiveness and particularity, that the engines of the defendant, and the one engine especially complained of, were fitted with all the best appliances in known practical use for the preventio
Schultz v. Statepublic domain
District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2018-09-04 · Published · cited 1× · 330 F. Supp. 3d 1344
MADELINE HUGHES HAIKALA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Bradley Hester was arrested and jailed in Cullman County. He was, and others similarly situated are, detained in the Cullman County jail following arrest because they cannot afford to post a surety bond or a property bond as a condition of pretrial release. Mr. Hester asks the Court to preliminarily enjoin the Cullman County Sheriff from detaining indigent defendants who cannot