Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Webb v. Miller”
Webb v. Millerpublic domain
Allen County, No. 1-91-35.
Webb v. Millerpublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 621 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 622 OPINION Defendant and appellant Jack Miller, as Interim Director of the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) appe
Miller v. Webb of Buffalo, LLCpublic domain
Motion for reargument or leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present— Smith, J.P., Carni, Sconiers and Valentino, JJ.
Miller v. Webb of Buffalo, LLCpublic domain
Motion for reargument or leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present— Smith, J.P., Carni, Sconiers and Valentino, JJ.
Patrick Miller Webb, Jr. v. State of Iowapublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 18-0693 Filed March 20, 2019 PATRICK MILLER WEBB, JR., Applicant-Appellant, vs. STATE OF IOWA, Respondent-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Samantha Gronewald, Judge. Patrick Miller Webb Jr. appeals the district court’s denial of his postconviction-re
MILLER, GREGORY v. WEBB OF BUFFALO, LLCpublic domain
Appeals and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Patrick H. NeMoyer, J.), entered December 3, 2013. The order denied the motion and cross motions of defendants for summary judgment. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion and cross motions are granted, and the complaint and cross claims are
Miller v. Webbpublic domain
C. A.-6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Miller v. Webbpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 2 Miller v. Webb No. 02-5907 ELECTRONIC CITATION: 2004 FED App. 0323P (6th Cir.) File Name: 04a0323p.06 _________________ OPINION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS ______
Miller v. Webbpublic domain
C. A.-6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Miller v. Webbpublic domain
ORDER This is an appeal from a district court judgment denying the relief sought in a petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. RApp. P. 34(a). In 2001, Kentucky inmate James Miller filed a §
State v. Webbpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Webb, 2021-Ohio-2637.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT CRAWFORD COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO. 3-20-17 v. ALEC VERNON WEBB, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Appeal from Crawford County Common Pleas Court Trial Court
Webb v. Statepublic domain
See Iowa R. App. P. 6.904 AFFIRMED.
Leath v. Webbpublic domain
Joseph M. Hood, Senior U.S. District Judge While most people were busy celebrating the 2016 New Year, police in Lexington were investigating a homicide. The first shooting victim of the year had arrived at University of Kentucky Chandler Hospital on January 1. And before the sun *888set on that first day of the year, UK Police learned from Lexi
Webb v. Millerpublic domain
Carleton Harris, Chief Justice. Appellants, Virgil Webb and wife, Wilma, instituted their complaint against Albert J. Miller and wife, G-race wherein it was alleged that appellees had wrongfully entered upon appellants’ property (the west 17.8 feet thereof) and had dug holes, destroyed surveyor’s markers, piled fencing materials on the premises, and deprived appellants of the use and enjoyment of their la
Kenny Roy Miller v. Patti Webb, Wardenpublic domain
KEITH, J., delivered the opinion of the ourt, in which CLAY, J., joined. GIBBONS, J. (pp. 678-83), delivered a separate dissenting opinion. OPINION KEITH, Circuit Judge. Petitioner-Appellant Kenny Roy Miller (“Miller”) is currently serving a life sentence after a state conviction for intentional murder, criminal attempt to commit murder, first-degree burglary, and being a f
People v. Webbpublic domain
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by her motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Buchter, J.), imposed November 22, 2011, on the ground that the sentence was excessive. Ordered that the sentence is affirmed. Under the circumstances presented, the defendant’s purported waiver of her right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257 [2011]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248
State v. Webbpublic domain
JAMES F. McKAY III, Chief Judge. | STATEMENT OF THE CASE On February 24, 2011, the State indicted Benjamin T. Webb, also known as Webb Benjamin, also known as Tyronne Benjamin (defendant) with two counts of aggravated rape (counts 1 and 2), violations of La. R.S. 14:42, and one count (count 3) of aggravated kidnapping, a violation of La. R.S. 14:44. The defendant pled not guilty on all charges on March 15
People v. Webbpublic domain
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by her motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Buchter, J.), imposed November 22, 2011, on the ground that the sentence was excessive. Ordered that the sentence is affirmed. Under the circumstances presented, the defendant’s purported waiver of her right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257 [2011]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248
Webb v. Webbpublic domain
415 F.Supp.2d 678 (2006) Vardry Renard WEBB Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant v. Sandra Denise Givan WEBB, Cecil G. Woods Defendants/Counter-Claimant/Cross-Claimant/Cross-Defendant Third-Party Plaintiff v. Franklin D. Riley Third-Party Defendant No. Civ.A. 304CV246BN. United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Jackson Division. February 16, 2006.
Hohmann v. Webbpublic domain
COX, J., Before the court for disposition are the preliminary objections filed on behalf of the defendants Robert L. Webb, Jr., and Sharyn Webb, which assert the following arguments: *540I. The court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the current case as the plaintiff has failed to provide proper notice as set forth in “Act 6” or, more spec