Cases

ACCEPTED 12-15-00277-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 11/16/2015 5:51:19 PM

ACCEPTED 03-16-00203-CV 13816645 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 15-24-00120-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/14/2025 6:14 PM No. 15-24-00120-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

REAVLEY, Circuit Judge: The Florida Department of Insurance (Florida), receiver for Western Star Insurance Company, appeals the district court’s order granting Chase Bank of Texas’s Motion for Summary Judgment, and denying Florida’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. The district court dismissed Florida’s claims for fraud and breach of fiduciary duty against Chase Bank, who was

J-A22039-17 2018 PA Super 267 KENNETH MURRAY, ROBERT : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SCHNALL, MICHAEL SCOTT, JOHN : PENNSYLVANIA SENESE, JOHN SHURINA, JOHN : SIGNORILE, KEVIN SOKOL, : ANTHONY TRICARICO, FRANK : VENTRELLA, JOSPH VITALE, PATRICK : VOGT, HENRY WHITE, WILLIAM : WHITE, THOMAS WOSKA AND : WILLIAM YOUNGSON, : No. 2105 ED

Opinion by JUDGE WEBB ¶ 1 When an insurer becomes insolvent and liquidation of its assets does not produce sufficient funds to pay claims, should the loss be borne by first party insureds or third party claimants? The General. Assembly has created a guaranty association to pay the covered claims of an insolvent insurer.. But then, after payment to a third party claimant, does the loss stop at the association

ACCEPTED 07-14-00405-CV SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 2/18/2015 4:43:44 PM

94 F.Supp.2d 316 (2000) Robert A. FALISE; Louis Klein, Jr.; Frank Macchiarola; and Christian E. Markety, Jr. as Trustees, Plaintiffs, v. The AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY; R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company; B.A.T. Industries, PLC; Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation; Philip Morris Incorporated; Liggett Group, Inc.; and Lorillard Tobacco Company, Defendants. No. 99 CV 7392. United States District Court, E

256 B.R. 377 (2000) In re AMERICAN FAMILY ENTERPRISES, a Delaware general partnership, et al., Debtors and Debtors-in-Possession. No. 99-41774(RG). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. September 11, 2000. *378 *379 *380 *381

ACCEPTED 03-15-00528-CV 7458584 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

493 F.Supp. 721 (1980) AMERICAN GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. EQUITABLE GENERAL CORPORATION et al. Civ. A. No. 78-0639-R. United States District Court, E. D. Virginia, Richmond Division. May 5, 1980. On Motion to Amend June 16, 1980. *722 *723 *724

618 F.3d 300 (2010) In re INSURANCE BROKERAGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION OptiCare Health Systems, Inc., Comcar Industries, Inc., Sunburst Hospitality Corporation, Robert Mulcahy, Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District, Glenn Singer, Redwood Oil Company, Omni Group of Companies, Bayou Steel Corporation, Clear Lam Packaging, Inc., Cellect, LLC, Enclave, LLC, Gateway Club Apartments, Ltd., Michigan Multi-King, Inc., City of Stamford, Belmont

COLORADO COURT OF

ACCEPTED 03-14-00726-CV 3887778 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1

218 F.Supp.2d 1047 (2002) Kelli Rae WENSEL, Plaintiff, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. No. C01-3019-MWB. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Central Division. August 7, 2002. *1048 *1049 Michael Carroll, Coppola, Sandre, McConville & Carroll, PC, West Des

Case: 12-14009 Date Filed: 02/16/2017 Page: 1 of 90 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 12-14009 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cv-22026-MGC DR. B

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH No. 24-1570 AND MANUFACTURERS OF D.C. No. AMERICA, 6:19-cv-01996- MO Plaintiff - Appellee, v. OPINION ANDREW R. STOLFI, in his official capacity as Director of the Ore

Case: 12-14009 Date Filed: 02/16/2017 Page: 1 of 90 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 12-14009 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cv-22026-MGC DR. B

PER CURIAM: In these consolidated cases, we review orders of the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC” or the “Commission”) implementing the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984 (the “Cable Act” or the “Act”), Pub.L. No. 98-549, 98 Stat. 2779 (codified in scattered sections of 47 U.S.C.). The orders under review embody a number of “legislative” and “interpretive” rules that have been challenged by an assortment of disc

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SHADUR, District Judge. Nancy Resnick (“Resnick”) sued American Dental Association (“ADA”) on her behalf and as a representative of all women similarly situated, charging ADA has engaged in a series of employment practices discriminating unlawfully against women. Resnick has filed motions seeking: 1. a Fed. R. Civ. P. (“Rule”) 37 motion to compel c