Cases

ORDER PER CURIAM: Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently granted. NIX, C.J., and FLAHERTY and ZAPPALA, JJ., dissent and would reverse the Order of the Superior Court.

OPINION Brian Quinn, Chief Justice This is an appeal from an order denying an application for a license to sell alcoholic *136 beverages at a Pak-a-Sak convenience store location in the City of Perryton (the City). The denial was premised on a municipal ordinance which prohi

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS BRIAN QUINN, Chief Justice. Crawford & Company, Crawford & Company Healthcare Management, Inc., Patsy Hogan and Republic Insurance Company (collectively referred to as Crawford) petition the court for a writ of mandamus. We are being requested to: ... conditionally issue a writ of m

Supreme Court Docket Number: D-3148 02/10/1993 App for WOE / Disposed GRANTED 11/24/1993 Supreme Court opinion issued CA REV/REM Supreme Court Docket Number: 94-1276 02/16/1995 App for WOE / Disposed DENIED OPINION This appeal involves the determination of whether an informal marriage existed between Ronald Kent Lorensen and Vivian Alice Weaber. The trial court found that an informal marriage existed and thereafter entered a decree of divorce dividing the marit

PER CURIAM Relators in this mandamus proceeding contend that the trial court abused its discretion when it refused to dismiss claims over which the Division of Workers’ Compensation has exclusive jurisdiction. Because all of the claims arise out of rela-tors’ investigation, handling, and settling of claims for workers’ compensation benefits, we agree. In

374 Pa. Superior Ct. 377 (1988) 543 A.2d 128 Theodore GROFF and Denise Groff, h/w, Appellants, v. PETE KINGSLEY BUILDING, INC. v. H. Glenn ESBENSHADE and Leslie L. Witmer, t/a G & L Developers, Realty Trade and Equity Company of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, Warren Weaber, Inc., J.K. Towers and the Township of East Hemfield v. B.R. KREIDER & SON, INC., Appellees. Supreme Court

By Judge James H. Chamblin This cause came before the Court on April 12-15, 2004, for hearing on the Amended Bill of Complaint filed herein by the Plaintiff, Patricia A. Kiefer, and on the Cross-Bill filed by the Defendants, Donald L. and Wanda Jean Mikovch. At the conclusion of the hearing, I found, for the reasons stated from the bench that there was no trespass by any defendant upon the property of Kie

BLUFF CREEK TOWNHOMES ASSOC., INC. v. HAMMON Skip to Main Content Accessibility Statement Help Contact Us

OPINION BY SHOGAN, J.: Appellants, Public Communications, Inc. (“PCI”), and Zimmer, Inc., Zimmer USA, Inc. and Zimmer Holdings, Inc. (collectively “Zimmer”), appeal from the entry of judgment in favor of Margo Polett (“Mrs. Polett”) and Daniel Polett, her husband. After careful review, we vacate and remand for a new trial. In May of 2006, Zimmer launched the Gender Solutions Knee, a new kn

DENNIS, Justice, dissenting. I respectfully dissent. The majority opinion, in my view incorrectly interprets La.R.S. 45:1503(C), as did our opinion in Communications, Ind., Inc. v. Louisiana Public Service Commission, 260 La. 1, 254 So.2d 613 (1971), as requiring only a single hearing before the commission may grant a certificate to a radio common carrier which will be in competition

104 S.W.3d 612 (2003) HERITAGE RESOURCES, INC., Appellant, v. Margaret Hunt HILL, Individually, et al., Appellees. No. 08-01-00383-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, El Paso. February 13, 2003. *615 Marcellene Malouf, Law Offices of Stephen F. Malouf, P.C., Dallas, for Appellant. Thomas E. Kurth, Haynes and Boone, Ronald Holma

WINCHESTER, J., dissenting: ¶ 1 I respectfully dissent. It is important to point out what 23 O.S.2011, § 61.2 does not do: (1) it does not cap damages in cases of wrongful death; (2) it does not cap economic damages for lost wages; (3) it does not cap economic damages for medical expenses; and (4) it does not bar the first $350,000 of non-economic damages, such as pain and suffering. With the passage of § 61.2, the Legislature dete

255 S.W.3d 640 (2008) In re Susan ROBERTS and John R. Roberts, Jr., Individually and as Next Friends of Their Minor Children Jamie Roberts, Joshua Roberts, and Haley Roberts, Relators. No. 05-0362. Supreme Court of Texas. June 6, 2008. *641 Ken Slavin, Kemp Smith, LLP, El Paso, George L. Thompson III, Thompson & Kerby, P.C., Lubbock,

OSCN Found Document:BEASON v. I. E. MILLER SERVICES, INC. BEASON v. I. E. MILLER SERVICES, INC.2019 OK 28Case Number: 114301Decided: 04/23/2019THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2019 OK 28, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO RE

941 A.2d 560 (2008) 178 Md. App. 232 TRINITY ASSEMBLY OF GOD OF BALTIMORE CITY, INC. v. PEOPLE'S COUNSEL FOR BALTIMORE COUNTY, et al. No. 2840, Sept. Term, 2006. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. February 6, 2008. *562 C. William Clark, Towson, for appellant. Peter M. Zimmerman, People's Counsel

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS ) HERITAGE RESOURCES, INC.,) No. 08-01-00383-CV ) Appellant,) Appeal from ) v.) 109th District Court )

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 283 OPINION ¶ 1 Cheryl Holmstrom challenges the trial court's denial of her requests for two jury instructions and her motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) and, alternatively, for a new trial. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶ 2 "In reviewing a jury verdict, we

Affirmed and Opinion Filed December 12, 2023 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00898-CV CITY OF EULESS, SELF-INSURED, Appellant V. MARTA DANYLYK, HELMUT HOFER, SOFIJA HOFER AND THE TEXAS SUBSEQUENT INJURY FUND, Appellees On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court

OPINION ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice. This is an appeal from a final decree of divorce following a bench trial. Miguel challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support (1) the appointment of Norma as the joint managing conservator with the right to determine the primary residence of the child; (2) the monthly ehild support awarded

JOHNSON, Judge: Appellee, Abat’s Auto Tag Service, Inc. (Abat’s), issued a temporary registration card and plate to one Nolan Brown in November of 1980, allegedly without proof of insurance *352coverage. In April of 1981, appellant Lieberman was struck and injured by Brown in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Appellant brought suit in October of 1983, charging that his inju