Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
19 opinions for “We The Patriots USA, Inc v. Connecticut Office of Early Childhood Development”
22-249-cv We The Patriots USA, Inc. et al. v. Conn. Office of Early Childhood Dev. et al. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2022 (Argued: October 13, 2022 Decided: August 4, 2023) Docket No. 22-249-cv WE THE PATRIOTS USA, INC.; CT FREEDOM ALLIANCE, LLC; CONSTANTI
State of Texas v. USApublic domain
JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: The United States1 appeals a preliminary injunction, pending trial, forbidding implementation of the Deferred Action for Parents of Americans -and Lawful Permanent Residents program (“DAPA”). Twenty-six states (the “states”2) challenged DAPA under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) and the Take Care Clause of the Constitution;
State of Texas v. USApublic domain
JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: Twenty-six states (the “states”) are challenging the government’s1 Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents program (“DAPA”) as violative of the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) and the Take Care Clause of the Constitution. The district court determined that the states are likely to succeed on their, procedural APA claim, so it tem
Concurrence by Judge Owens WARDLAW, Circuit Judge: *485It is no hyperbole to say that Dulce Garcia embodies the American dream. Born into poverty, Garcia and her parents shared a San Diego house with other families to save money on rent; she was even homeless for a time as a child. But she studied hard and excelled academical
Sharikov v. Philips Medical Systems MR, Inc.public domain
23-407-cv Sharikov v. Philips Medical Systems MR, Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ___________________________ August Term, 2023 (Submitted: October 20, 2023 Decided: June 4, 2024) Docket No. 23-407-cv
Rachel Spivack v. City of Philadelphiapublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______________ No. 23-1212 ______________ RACHEL SPIVACK, Appellant v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA; LAWRENCE S. KRASNER ________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Ea
Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany v. Vullopublic domain
Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany v Vullo (2024 NY Slip Op 02764) Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany v Vullo 2024 NY Slip Op 02764 [42 NY3d 213] May 21, 2024 Wilson, Ch. J., J. Court of Appeals Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant
Jansen v. Packaging Corp. of Americapublic domain
COFFEY, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I concur with the majority view, set forth in the Court’s per curiam opinion, that the district judge properly dismissed Jansen’s retaliation and intentional infliction of emotional distress claims. Per Curiam Op. at p. 493. I also agree with the majority that the district judge’s grant of summary judgmen
123 F.3d 490 74 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1138,71 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 44,940Alice JANSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.PACKAGING CORPORATION OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee.Kimberly B. ELLERTH, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 95-3128, 96-1361. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. Argued May 15, 199
Spillane v. Lamontpublic domain
************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor
Miller v. McDonaldpublic domain
24-681 Miller v. McDonald In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit _________________ August Term 2024 Argued: November 18, 2024 Decided: March 3, 2025 Docket No. 24-681 JOSEPH MILLER, EZRA WENGERD,
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1887 Doc: 71 Filed: 12/31/2024 Pg: 1 of 21 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-1887 WEST VIRGINIA PARENTS FOR RELIGIOUS FREEDOM; PASTOR CHRIS FIGARETTI; JUDD UHL, individually and on behalf of their minor children, and on behalf of others
Miller v. McDonaldpublic domain
24-681 Miller v. McDonald In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit _________________ August Term 2024 Argued: November 18, 2024 Decided: June 30, 2026 Docket No. 24-681 JOSEPH MILLER, EZRA WENGERD, JONAS SMUCKER, DYGERT R
Gordon College v. Small Business Administrationpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GORDON COLLEGE, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 23-614 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION
Gordon College v. Small Business Administrationpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GORDON COLLEGE, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 23-614 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION
Krystle Perry v. Stacy Marteneypublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 24-2132 Doc: 65 Filed: 04/08/2026 Pg: 1 of 38 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-2132 KRYSTLE PERRY, individually and on behalf of their minor child K.P.; ANTHONY PERRY, individually and on behalf of their minor child K.P., P
Uc Regents v. Usdhspublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY No. 18-15068 OF CALIFORNIA; JANET NAPOLITANO, in her official D.C. No. capacity as President of the 3:17-cv-05211-WHA University of California, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, in her official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security,
United States v. Tsarnaevpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 16-6001 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. DZHOKHAR A. TSARNAEV, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. George A. O'Toole, Jr., U.S. District Judge]
United States v. Polizzipublic domain
(2008) UNITED STATES of America, v. Peter POLIZZI, Defendant. No. 06-CR-22 (JBW). United States District Court, E.D. New York. April 1, 2008. MEMORANDUM, ORDER & JUDGMENT JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge: TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction.....................................................................