Cases

Supreme Court No. 2023-286-Appeal. (PC 23-20) Xavier T. Vidot : v. : Wayne T. Salisbury, Jr. et al. : NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Rhode Island Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Opinion Analyst, Supreme

HIGGINBOTHAM, J. laThis is an action for personal injuries sustained by a special-education teacher, who was allegedly attacked by a ten-year-old special-education student.2 The teacher seeks recovery for the negligent and intentional acts of the minor child’s parents and the minor, for whom the parents are vicariously liable. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the parents’ homeow

MARY Beth Kelly, J. We granted leave to appeal in this case to determine the scope of an employer’s vicarious liability for quid pro quo sexual harassment affecting public services under Michigan’s Civil Rights Act (CRA).1 Specifically, we consider whether Wayne County and its sheriffs department may be held vicariously liable for a civil rights claim und

PER CURIAM *1177AND NOW, this 21st day of November, 2018, the order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED .

750 F.Supp.2d 990 (2010) JEFFERY BURKHOLDER, Sr., Martin Grooms, and Sofia Rosales, on behalf of themselves and all other Plaintiffs similarly situated known and unknown, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF FORT WAYNE, Defendant. Case No. 1:08-cv-273. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, Fort Wayne Division. November 1, 2010. *992 Jame

Larry Joplin, Judge: ¶ 1 Mother, Rachael Richards, appeals the trial court’s order, filed December 15,,2015, modifying custody, visitation and child support. In the order, the trial court found Mother did not have a good faith basis to relocate with the children and Father, Wayne *1177 Richards,

Justice Willett delivered the opinion of the Court. In this latest chapter of a long-running dispute, we consider how the harm likely to result from a malicious prosecution should be evaluated in calculating exemplary damages. We conclude the court of appeals erred in considering the harm that plaintiff would suffer from wrongful imprisonment when the chance

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Oct 25 2016, 6:45 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals

OSCN Found Document:RICHARDS v. RICHARDS OSCN navigation Home Courts Court Dockets

RICHARD J. LEON, United States District Judge If there ever were an antitrust case where the parties had a dramatically different assessment of the current state of the relevant market and a fundamentally different vision of its future development, this is the one. Small wonder it had to go to trial! *164On November 20, 2017, t

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE January 29, 2014 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DAVID WAYNE RICHARDS Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hawkins County No. 12CR217 John F. Dugger, Jr., Judge No. E2013-01054-CCA-R3-CD-FILED-MARCH 25, 2014 The appellant, David Wayne Richards, pled guilty in the Hawkins County Criminal Court to posses

OPINION OF THE COURT Frank C. Bowers, Jr., J. This proceeding was initiated by the filing of foster care *315review petitions by both the foster parents and the Department of Social Services (DSS). At an initial appearance on these petitions the attorney for the natural mother moved that the child be returned to the natural mother and the petitions be

OPINION CHANDLER, Chancellor. World of Warcmft, the market-leading massively multiplayer online role playing game, entices millions of paying subscribers to immerse themselves in a virtual online world. These subscribers create their own characters, and through these avatars they interact with other players, *322develop skills,

796 F.Supp. 1456 (1992) Larry D. RICHARDS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. 91-C-1304A. United States District Court, D. Utah, C.D. June 5, 1992. *1457 Loni F. DeLand, Salt Lake City, Utah, for plaintiff. Wayne T. Dance, Asst. U.S. Atty., Salt Lake City, Utah, for defendant. ORDER GRAN

Cavanagh, J. (concurring in part and dissenting in part). I concur with the majority that Poletown Neighborhood Council v Detroit, 410 Mich 616; 304 NW2d 455 (1981), should be overruled. I also concur with section I of Justice WEAVER’S partial concurrence and partial dissent. I write separately, however, because I believe that the a

OPINION AND ORDER PHILIP P. SIMON, CHIEF JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT In the 1970’s, Doug Miller founded a business manufacturing and selling fuel additive products and lubricant products. In recent years, the family business, known as E.T. Products, was split into two parts, and Petroleum Solutions became the name of the lubricant business. When Doug was ready to retire in 2010, he sought buyers for

87 F.3d 1152 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Larry D. RICHARDS, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-4052. United States Court of Appeals,Tenth Circuit. June 28, 1996. Wayne T. Dance, Assistant United States Attorney, Scott M. Matheson, Jr., United States Attorney, Salt Lake City, Utah, for Plaintiff-App

HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, Judge. FACTS This appeal stems from both a summary judgment in favor of the respondent, Central Missouri Electric Cooperative (CMEC), on its Petition for Damages for electric power supplied to the Balkes, and a directed verdict in favor of CMEC on Appellants’, Richard and Ruth Balke’s, counterclaim for damages sustained due to CMEC’s wrongful termination of electrical power.

OPINION BAKER, Judge Appellant-Defendant, the City of Fort Wayne (the City), appeals a jury verdict in favor of appellees-plaintiffs Richard D. Moore and Eleanor Moore (collectively, the Moores), claiming that the trial court erred in denying its motion for judgment on the evidence. Specifically, the City contends, inter alia, that the evidence presented at trial failed to support the Moores’ cla

67 F.3d 1531 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Larry D. RICHARDS, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-4052. United States Court of Appeals,Tenth Circuit. Oct. 11, 1995. Wayne T. Dance, Assistant United States Attorney (Scott M. Matheson, Jr., United States Attorney, with him on the briefs), Salt Lake City