⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Watson v. Federal National Mortgage Association”

District Court, D. Hawaii · 2013-12-31 · Published · cited 1× · 990 F. Supp. 2d 1042; 2013 WL 6894453; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 181584
ORDER (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY’S MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT, AND (2) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART REMAINING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT DERRICK K. WATSON, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Before the Court are the following motions: (1) Defendant Federal Housing Fi
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011-05-27 · Published · cited 0× · 61 So. 3d 1283; 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 7738; 2011 WL 2097690
PER CURIAM. ON CONFESSION OF ERROR Pursuant to Appellee’s confession of error, the Final Judgment of Mortgage Foreclosure is reversed and the matter remanded to the trial court for the appropriate further proceedings. REVERSED and REMANDED. GRIFFIN, PALMER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011-05-04 · Published · cited 0× · 60 So. 3d 554; 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 6359; 2011 WL 1682205
PER CURIAM. Appellant Luis Villanueva, defendant below, appeals final summary judgment entered for the plaintiff in an action to foreclose a mortgage. Appellant contends that there are disputed issues of material fact regarding the standing of the original plaintiff to bring suit. Appellee, having reviewed the record and the initial brief, agrees that entry of summary judgment was premature and confesses error. We accordingl
District Court, District of Columbia · 2018-09-27 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________ ) SADDIQ ABDUL-BAAQIY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 15-450 (RMC) ) FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ) ASSOCIATION, )
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2014-06-12 · Published · cited 0×
Reverse and Remand; Opinion Filed June 12, 2014. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00984-CV FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, Appellant V. JAMES EPHRIAM AND ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS, Appellees On Appeal from the County Court at Law No.
Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1996-11-01 · Published · cited 0× · 681 So. 2d 1256; 1996 La. LEXIS 3012; 1996 WL 635759
In re Landry, Doris; —Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of St. Charles, 29th Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, No. 45,349; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 96-CA-0352. Not considered; not timely filed. WATSON, J., not on panel.
District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1994-03-28 · Published · cited 0× · 854 F. Supp. 912; 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17543; 1994 WL 250006
ORDER BOWEN, District Judge. On October 17, 1988, the Court certified this case as a Georgia usury class action. The Defendants Federal National Mortgage Association, First Federal Savings Association of Walterboro, GEICO Financial Services, Inc. (formerly known as Government Employees Corporation), Republic Security Bank and Southeast Mortgage Corporation [“Defendants”] have filed counterclaim
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-12-03 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00350-CV 8083814 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2013-05-14 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE March 12, 2013 Session FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION v. TN METRO HOLDINGS XII LLC ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Sumner County No. 2011C-47 Tom E. Gray, Chancellor No. M2012-01803-COA-R3-CV - Filed May 14, 2013 Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”) init
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2013-07-23 · Published · cited 13× · 409 S.W.3d 490; 2013 WL 3943016; 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 855
OPINION ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, Judge. Fiona Wilson (Respondent) lost her home to Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) in a foreclosure sale. When Respondent failed to vacate after the sale, Fannie Mae filed an action for unlawful detainer. The trial court entered judgment in favor of Respondent, finding that her right to possession of the property was superior to Fannie Mae’s and tha
Supreme Court of Missouri · 2014-08-19 · Published · cited 59× · 438 S.W.3d 410; 2014 WL 4086671; 2014 Mo. LEXIS 208
MARY R. RUSSELL, Chief Justice. Homeowners appeal from the trial court’s judgment dismissing their claim against Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”) and CitiMortgage under the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act (MMPA), section 407.020, 1 for an alleged wrongful foreclosure of a deed of trust. The trial
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2013-03-18 · Published · cited 9× · 489 B.R. 638
*639 AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION DENYING FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION’S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM STAY AND OVERRULING FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION’S OBJECTION TO CONFIRMATION OF PLAN ROBERT A. GORDON, Bankruptcy Judge. I. Preliminary Statement This dispute draws into question the ability of a Chapter 13 debt
District Court, District of Columbia · 2012-12-11 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BANK OF AMERICA, N. A., As Indenture Trustee, Custodian, and Collateral Agent for OCALA FUNDING, LLC, Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, v. Civil Action No. 10-CV-1681 (BJR) FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County · 1976-10-06 · Published · cited 0× · 75 Pa. D. & C.2d 666; 1976 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 251
FINKELHOR, J., Plaintiff, Federal National Mortgage Association (Federal National), brought the instant action as the named mortgagee to recover the full value ($10,000) of a fire insurance policy, issued by defendant, Grocers Mutual Insurance Company (Grocers Mutual), and insuring premises which were totally destroyed by fire. Defendant denied coverage to plaintiff on the grounds: (1) that plaintiff was legal owner rat
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025-11-10 · Published · cited 0×
Appellate Case: 24-1293 Document: 126 Date Filed: 11/10/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS November 10, 2025
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015-08-21 · Published · cited 7× · 472 S.W.3d 444
OPINION BONNIE SUDDERTH, JUSTICE. Former rules of civil procedure 738-755 governed forcible entry and detainer until the supreme court repealed them in 2013 and replaced them with rules of civil procedure 500.4 and 510.3-.5, .7-.13. Compare Tex. R. Civ. P. 738-755 (West 2013, repealed 2013), with Tex. R. Civ. P. 50
District Court, District of Columbia · 2010-07-28 · Published · cited 0× · 725 F. Supp. 2d 169; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76178
*172 MEMORANDUM OPINION RICHARD J. LEON, District Judge. Before the Court are four motions arising from two nearly identical derivative lawsuits brought originally by plaintiff shareholder James Kellmer. The two lawsuits were originally captioned as Kellmer v
Harness v. Watsonpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022-08-24 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 19-60632 Document: 00516445896 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/24/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 24, 2022
District Court, District of Columbia · 2010-07-28 · Published · cited 0× · 725 F. Supp. 2d 142; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76119
MEMORANDUM ORDER RICHARD J. LEON, District Judge. Before the Court are two motions, both of which seek dismissal of this case but for very different reasons. The first motion, which was filed by the plaintiff Federal Housing Finance Agency (“FHFA”) as the conservator for the Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”), requests volu