Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Watson v. Cooper”
State v. Cooperpublic domain
McDONALD, J. The defendant, James Allen Cooper, Jr., was charged by bill of information with failure to properly register as a sex offender, a violation of La. R.S. 15:542.1.4(A)(1). The defendant pled not guilty. The defendant filed a motion to quash the bill of information, which was denied. The defendant withdrew his former plea of not guilty and entered a Crosby plea of guilty as charged, reserving his right to
State v. Cooperpublic domain
McDONALD, J. The defendant, James Allen Cooper, Jr., was charged by bill of information with failure to properly register as a sex offender, a violation of La. R.S. 15:542.1.4(A)(1). The defendant pled not guilty. The defendant filed a motion to quash the bill of information, which was denied. The defendant withdrew his former plea of not guilty and entered a Crosby plea of guilty as charged, reserving his right to
State v. Watsonpublic domain
INMAN, Judge. *174 Tyrone Ty Watson ("Defendant") appeals from an order entered 28 May 2015 denying his motion to suppress and a judgment entered 8 July 2015 following his guilty plea to a charge of attempted robbery with a dangerous weapon. On appeal, Defendant contends that the trial court
State v. Watsonpublic domain
DILLON, Judge. *455 Rodney Edward Watson ("Defendant") appeals from the trial court's judgments convicting him of several drug-related offenses and declaring him a habitual felon. Specifically, he seeks review of the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress. For the following reasons,
People v. Cooperpublic domain
Motion to relieve counsel of assignment dismissed as premature and the appeals are dismissed. Memorandum: The matters are remitted to Cattaraugus County Court to vacate the judgments of conviction and dismiss the indictment and superior court information either sua sponte or on application of either the District Attorney or the counsel for defendant (see People v Matteson, 75 NY2d 745 [1989]). Present — Whalen, P.J., Peradotto
People v. Cooperpublic domain
Motion to relieve counsel of assignment dismissed as premature and the appeals are dismissed. Memorandum: The matters are remitted to Cattaraugus County Court to vacate the judgments of conviction and dismiss the indictment and superior court information either sua sponte or on application of either the District Attorney or the counsel for defendant (see People v Matteson, 75 NY2d 745 [1989]). Present — Whalen, P.J., Peradotto
Cooper v. Sowerspublic domain
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Robert Cooper seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying in part and granting in part Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing some of Cooper’s claims. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012)
Cooper v. Rhea Countypublic domain
MEMORANDUM CURTIS L. COLLIER, District Judge. Before the Court are motions to dismiss by two defendants and a motion for additional time to serve process by the plaintiff. Defendant Jesse Wilke (“Wilke”) filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (Court File No. 19). Plaintiff Monolito B. Cooper (“Plaintiff’) filed a response (Court Fil
Gillispie v. Timmerman-Cooperpublic domain
DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS MICHAEL R. MERZ, United States Magistrate Judge. This is a habeas corpus action brought by Petitioner Roger Dean Gillispie pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 seeking relief from his convictions for nine counts of rape with firearm specifications, three counts of kidnaping with firearm specifications, three counts of gross sexual imposition, and one c
State v. Watsonpublic domain
634 S.E.2d 231 (2006) STATE of North Carolina v. Dock WATSON. No. COA05-1439. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. September 5, 2006. Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Assistant Attorney General Jay L. Osborne, for the State. McCotter, Ashton & Smith, P.A., by Rudolph A. Ashton, III, and Terri W. Sharp, New Bern, for defendant-appellant.
State v. Watsonpublic domain
McCULLOUGH, Judge. Defendant LaTanya Rochelle Watson was charged with possession with intent to sell and deliver cocaine. Prior to trial, defendant moved to suppress the cocaine seized during a warrantless search of her person during an investigatory stop. The motion was heard at the 7 January 2004 Criminal Session of Forsyth County Superior Court. The evidence tended to show the following: At approximately 3:00 a.m. on 3 June 2003
Brooks v. AAA Cooper Transportationpublic domain
781 F.Supp.2d 472 (2011) Warren BROOKS, Plaintiff, v. AAA COOPER TRANSPORTATION, Defendant. Civil Action No. H-10-0818. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. March 18, 2011. *474 Fransheneka Jane Watson, Law Office of Fransheneka Watson, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff. L. Traywick Duffie, Wesley Earl Stoc
State v. Watsonpublic domain
610 S.E.2d 472 (2005) STATE of North Carolina v. Natosha Renee WATSON. No. COA04-855. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. April 5, 2005. Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Assistant Attorney General Kathleen U. Baldwin and Special Deputy Attorney General William P. Hart, for the State. John T. Hall, Raleigh, for defendant-appellant.
Watson v. Tennessee Department of Safetypublic domain
361 S.W.3d 549 (2011) Bob Keith WATSON v. TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY. No. M2010-02193-COA-R3-CV. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Western Section, at Nashville. May 3, 2011 Session. September 30, 2011. Permission to Appeal Denied by Supreme Court February 16, 2012. *550 William Kennerly Burger,
Meikle v. Watsonpublic domain
69 P.3d 100 (2003) 138 Idaho 680 Robert MEIKLE, an individual; Rex and Vernita B. Meikle, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Torry WATSON, an individual, Defendant-Appellant. No. 27408. Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, March 2003 Term. April 18, 2003. *101 Cooper & Larsen, Pocatello, for appell
Rosen v. Watsonpublic domain
103 S.W.3d 25 (2003) Hon. Marc I. ROSEN, Judge, Boyd Circuit Court, Appellant, and Commonwealth of Kentucky (Real Party in Interest), Appellant, v. Joseph WATSON, Appellee. No. 2002-SC-0057-MR. Supreme Court of Kentucky. April 24, 2003. *26 A.B. Chandler, III, Attorney General, Perry T. Ryan, Assistant Attorney General, Offic
Watson v. Dillon Companies, Inc.public domain
615 F.Supp.2d 1221 (2009) Wayne WATSON and Mary Watson, Plaintiffs, v. DILLON COMPANIES, INC., d/b/a/ King Soopers, also d/b/a Inter-American Products, Inc., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 08-cv-00091-WDM-CBS. United States District Court, D. Colorado. January 7, 2009. *1223 Kenneth B. McClain, Andrew Kelley Smith, Scott A.
Watson v. Methacton School Districtpublic domain
513 F.Supp.2d 360 (2007) Monica WATSON, Plaintiff, v. METHACTON SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 05-2303. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. May 14, 2007. *361 *362 *363 *364 Charles S.
State of Tennessee v. James Ryan Watsonpublic domain
OPINION JERRY L. SMITH, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which JAMES CURWOOD WITT, JR. and J.C. McLIN, JJ., joined. Appellant, Ryan Watson, 1 was indicted in June of 2009 by the Polk County Grand Jury for driving under the influence
Cooper v. Watsonpublic domain
*364Nelson, Justice. This is an appeal from a summary judgment dismissing a third-party action on the ground that it is barred by Minn. St. 176.061, subd. 10. The issue brought before us is as follows: Does § 176.061, subd. 10, effective September 1, 1969, serve to bar unliquidated claims for indemnity against employers arising out of injuries to employees occurring pri