Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Watson Carpet & Floor Covering, Inc. v. Mohawk Industries, Inc.”
648 F.3d 452 (2011) WATSON CARPET & FLOOR COVERING, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. MOHAWK INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant-Appellee, Carpet Den, Inc.; Rick McCormick, Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellants. Nos. 09-6140, 09-6173. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: January 21, 2011. Decided and Filed: June 22, 2011. <
Watson's Carpet & Floor Coverings, Inc. v. McCormickpublic domain
247 S.W.3d 169 (2007) WATSON'S CARPET AND FLOOR COVERINGS, INC. v. Rick McCORMICK, et al. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Middle Section, at Nashville. January 12, 2006 Session. January 18, 2007. Permission to Appeal Denied May 14, 2007. *172 Alan Mark Turk, Brentwood, Tennessee, for the appellants, Rick McCormick
Hobart-Mayfield, Inc. v. NOCSAEpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0207p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ HOBART-MAYFIELD, INC., │ Plaintiff-
SD3, LLC v. Black & Decker Inc.public domain
ON REHEARING PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1746 SD3, LLC; SAWSTOP LLC, Plaintiffs – Appellants, v. BLACK & DECKER (U.S.) INC.; BLACK & DECKER CORPORATION; CHANG TYPE INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.; DELTA POWER EQUIPMENT CORP.; HITACHI KOKI CO., LTD.; HITACHI KOKI USA LTD.; MAKITA CORPORATION; MAKITA U.
Burtch v. Milberg Factors, Inc.public domain
662 F.3d 212 (2011) Jeoffrey L. BURTCH, Chapter 7 Trustee, Factory 2-U stores, Inc., et al., Appellant v. MILBERG FACTORS, INC.; Capital Factors, Inc.; the CIT Group/Commercial Services, Inc.; GMAC Commercial Finance, LLC; HSBC Business Credit (USA), Inc.; Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc.; Sterling Factors Corporation; Wells Fargo Century, Inc. No. 10-2818. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Erie County v. Morton Salt, Inc.public domain
OPINION RONALD LEE GILMAN, Circuit Judge. This is a purported class action brought by Erie County, Ohio on behalf of itself and other counties in northern Ohio against Morton Salt, Inc. and Cargill, Inc. Erie County claims that Morton and Car-gill have conspired to fix the price of rock salt in northern Ohio by geographically dividing the market and excl
SD3, LLC v. Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc.public domain
AGEE, Circuit Judge: SD3, LLC and its subsidiary, SawStop, LLC (together, “SawStop”), contend that several major table-saw manufacturers conspired to boycott SawStop’s safety technology and corrupt a private safety-standard-setting process, all with the aim of keeping that technology off the market. Consequently, SawStop sued nearly two dozen saw manufacturers and affiliated entities, alleging that they violated § 1 of the She
Evergreen Partnering Group, Inc. v. Pactiv Corp.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT STEARNS, District Judge. Plaintiff Evergreen Partnering Group (Evergreen) alleges that it was the victim of a conspiracy by defendants Pactiv Corp., Genpak, LLC, Dolco Packaging Corp., Solo Cup Company, Dart Container Corp. (collectively the producer defendants), and the American Chemistry Council (ACC) to freeze its close
R+L Carriers, Inc. v. DriverTech LLCpublic domain
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge O’MALLEY. Dissenting in part and concurring in part opinion filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN. O’MALLEY, Circuit Judge. In this patent infringement action, R + L Carriers, Inc. (“R + L”) appeals the district court’s dismissal with prejudice of its amended complaints and counterclaims against DriverTech LLC (“DriverTech”), Affiliated Computer
ACCEPTED 03-14-00735-CV 4703327 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Carlin Robbins v. New Cingular Wirelesspublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 17a0055p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT CARLIN ROBBINS; REBECCA LUTZ, ┐ Plaintiffs-Appellants, │
*991ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND [Re: ECF 31, 35] BETH LABSON FREEMAN, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Bay Area Surgical Management, LLC, Bay Area Surgical Group, Inc., Forest Surgery Center, L.P., SOAR Surgery Center, LLC, Knowles Surgery Center, LLC, National Ambulatory Surgery Center,
Carrier Corporation v. Outokumpu Oyjpublic domain
OPINION KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs-Appellants Carrier Corporation, Carrier SA, and Carrier Italia S.p.A. *435 (collectively “Carrier”) appeal the district court’s dismissal of their claims under the Sherman Act and the Tennessee Trade Practices Act for lac
Evergreen Partnering Group v. Pactiv Corporationpublic domain
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Evergreen Partnering Group, Inc. (“Evergreen”) appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts dismissing its Second Amended Complaint (“complaint”). The complaint alleges that defendants-appellees, polystyrene food service packaging manufacturers and two trade associations, refused in concert to dea
Per Curiam: In 2014, cyberattackers breached multiple U.S. Office of Personnel Management ("OPM") databases and allegedly stole the sensitive personal information-including birth dates, Social Security numbers, addresses, and even fingerprint records-of a staggering number of past, present, and prospective government workers. All told, the data breaches affected more than twenty-one m
MEMORANDUM OPINION Marvin Isgur, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Comcast Corporation, Comcast Sports Management Services, LLC, Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, Houston Sport-sNet Finance, LLC, Houston SportsNet Holdings, LLC, National Digital Television Center, LLC, Comcast SportsNet California, LLC, NBCUniversal Media, LLC, Jon Litner, John Ruth, Robert Pick, and Madison Bond have filed a motion
Carrier Corporation v. Outokumpu Oyjpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 12a0065p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X - CARRIER CORPORATION; CARRIER SA; Plaintif
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE: RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION (NO. II) MDL Docket No. 2925 Misc. No. 20-00008 (BAH) This document relates to: No. 1:19-cv-03379 (BAH) No. 1:19-cv-03516 (BAH) No. 1:19-cv-03517 (BAH) No. 1:19-cv-03618 (BAH) No. 1:20-cv-00023 (BAH) No
783 N.W.2d 551 (2010) 301 CLIFTON PLACE L.L.C., et al., Appellants, v. 301 CLIFTON PLACE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, Respondent, and Kraus-Anderson Construction Company, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Ramsey Excavating Company, a/k/a Ramsey Excavating and Kremer & Davis, Inc., Third-Party Defendants. No. A09-1293. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. June 1, 2010.
In re Automotive Parts Antitrust Litigationpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ COLLECTIVE MOTION TO DISMISS INDIRECT PURCHASER ACTIONS MARIANNE O. BATTANI, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendants’ Collective Motion to Dismiss End-Payor Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint (Doc. No. 65 in 12-603), and Automobile Dealer Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Class Complaint (Doc. No. 62 in 12-602