Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Waterhouse v. Secretary, Department of Corrections”
Waterhouse v. Tuckerpublic domain
Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Thomas, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Waterhouse v. Tuckerpublic domain
Sup. Ct. Ark. [Cer-tiorari granted, ante, p. 941.] Motion of Michigan et al. for leave to participate in oral argument as amici curiae and for divided argument denied.
Waterhouse v. Rodriguezpublic domain
660 F.Supp. 319 (1987) Robert B. WATERHOUSE, New York Parole Number AU60100, Florida State Prison Inmate Number 075376, Petitioner, v. Ramon J. RODRIGUEZ, Chairman of the New York State Board of Parole, Robert Abrams, The Attorney General of the State of New York, Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections, and R.L. Dugger, Superintendent of the Florida State Prison, Respondents. No. CV 86 4262.<
Waterhouse v. Rodriguezpublic domain
WINTER, Circuit Judge: In Solina v. United States, 709 F.2d 160 (2d Cir.1983), we held that a criminal defendant is denied his sixth amendment right to effective assistance of counsel when, unbeknownst to the defendant, he is represented by unlicensed counsel. This appeal raises the question whether Solina applies when a defendant’s counsel is disbarred during a pretrial proceeding but withdraws after becomin
Waterhouse v. Rodriguezpublic domain
848 F.2d 375 57 USLW 2011 Robert B. WATERHOUSE, New York Parole Number AU60100,Florida State Prison Inmate Number 075376,Petitioner-Appellee,v.Ramon J. RODRIGUEZ, Chairman of the New York State Board ofParole, Robert Abrams, The Attorney General of the State ofNew York, Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary of the FloridaDepartment of Corrections, and R.L. Dugger, Superintendentof the Florida St
Dugger v. Waterhousepublic domain
Sup. Ct. Fla. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.
Dugger v. Waterhousepublic domain
Sup. Ct. Fla. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.
Candillo v. North Carolina Department of Correctionspublic domain
199 F.Supp.2d 342 (2002) John C. CANDILLO, Plaintiff, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Division of Adult Probation and Parole Judicial Division 3, Defendant. No. 1:00CV1245. United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina. March 18, 2002. *343 *344 Roman C. Pibl, Kluttz Reamer Bl
Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Servicespublic domain
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2024 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Servicespublic domain
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 605 U. S. Part 1 Pages 303–326 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 5, 2025 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are r
Colgan v. Department of Justicepublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) JAMES CALHOUN COLGAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 14-cv-740 (TSC) ) DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Reiger v. Price Waterhouse Coopers LLPpublic domain
117 F.Supp.2d 1003 (2000) Robert REIGER, et al., On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. PRICE WATERHOUSE COOPERS LLP, Defendant. Nos. 98-CV-0528 W, 98-CV-0553 W, 98-CV-0612 W, 98-CV-0697 W, 98-CV-0806 W, 98-CV-0827 W. United States District Court, S.D. California. October 2, 2000. *1004 William
Wadelton v. Department of Statepublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION TANYA S. CHUTEAN, District Judge Plaintiff Joan Wadelton is a retired Foreign Service Officer involved in litigation against the Department of State (“State”) concerning her non-promotion. In this Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) action, joined by the progressive blog Truth-out, she seeks documents about her that were maintained in vario
Rouch World LLC v. Department of Civil Rightspublic domain
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Bridget M. McCormack Brian K. Zahra
Rouch World LLC v. Department of Civil Rightspublic domain
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Bridget M. McCormack Brian K. Zahra
Rouch World LLC v. Department of Civil Rightspublic domain
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Bridget M. McCormack Brian K. Zahra
OPINION & ORDER ALGENON L. MARBLEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Jane Doe, an eleven-year-old transgender girl, seeks to use the girls’ restroom at Highland Elementary School. Highland will not permit her to do so. After an investigation, the Office of Civil Rights (“OCR”) of the Department of Education (“DOE”) found that Highland’s policy im-permissibly discriminated against Jane on the basis of her se
Stephen I. Adler v. Edward R. Madigan, Secretary, United States Department of Agriculturepublic domain
FLAUM, Circuit Judge. Stephen Adler works for the Forest Service in Wisconsin’s North Woods. In 1985, he filed charges of age discrimination with the Service’s parent, the United States Department of Agriculture (“DOA”), claiming that he had been unlawfully denied three positions for which he had applied. The first of these positions was a GS-11 Supervisor Guidance Counselor (“S
472 F.3d 1370 RICHLIN SECURITY SERVICE COMPANY, Appellant,v.Michael CHERTOFF, Secretary of Homeland Security, Appellee. No. 2006-1055. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. December 26, 2006. Gilbert J. Ginsburg, Attorney & Counselor-at-Law, of Washington, DC, argued for appellant.
LYNCH, Circuit Judge. Thomas Dutkiewicz was fired by his employer, Clean Harbors Environmental Services, Inc., after he repeatedly complained he felt his supervisors were pressuring him to violate Department of Transportation (“DOT”) fegulations for hauling hazardous materials, and that he would not do that. The company said he was fired because customers complained about his abra