Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Waste Action Project v. Draper Valley Holdings LLC”
Waste Action Project v. Draper Valley Holdings LLCpublic domain
ORDER REGARDING CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ROBERT S. LASNIK, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on “Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment” (Dkt. #41) and “Defendant Draper Valley’s Motion for Summary Judgment” (Dkt. # 49). Having reviewed the memoranda, declarations, and exhibits submitted by the parties, the Court finds as follows: BACKGROUND
Principal Growth Strategies, LLC v. AGH Parent LLCpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE PRINCIPAL GROWTH STRATEGIES, ) LLC, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2019-0431-JTL ) AGH PARENT LLC, et al., ) )
January 5, 2017 CHARLES N. DRAPER, § § Appellant, Pro Se § CAUSE NO. 03-16-00745-CV § V. § IN THE THIRD COURT § OF APPEALS GREG GUERNSEY, § IN HIS CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR OF § at Aus
Hill v. Vanderbilt Capital Advisors, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES 0. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Vanderbilt Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Complaint, filed August 31, 2010 (Doc. 36); (ii) the Individual State Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Claims, filed August 31, 2010 (Doc. 41); and (iii) the Motion of the Educational Retirement Fund to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Claims Und
Adams v. FRIGANZApublic domain
344 S.W.3d 240 (2011) Douglas ADAMS, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. John FRIGANZA, et al., Defendants/Respondents. No. ED 95374. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three. May 3, 2011. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 12, 2011. Application for Transfer Denied August 30, 2011.
ORDER STAYING PROCEEDINGS ALAN C. KAY, Senior District Judge. I. PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND 1 Invoking the Court’s diversity jurisdiction, Plaintiff National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA, has filed a complaint for declaratory relief. (Compl. ¶ 7, ECF No. 1; see also Am. Compl. ¶ 7, ECF No. 35.
Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. v. Alabama Gas Corp.public domain
PER CURIAM. The United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, Southern Division (“the federal district court”), has certified to this Court the following question pursuant to Rule 18, Ala. R.App. P.: “Under Alabama law, is a ‘Potentially Responsible Party’ (‘PRP’) letter from the Environmental Protection Agency (‘EPA’), in accordance with the Comprehensive Environmental Response C
01/25/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE August 18, 2021 Session JAMES P. LITTLE, M.D. ET AL. v. CITY OF CHATTANOOGA, TENNESSEE Appeal from the Chancery Court for Hamilton County No. 11-0407 Jeffrey M. Atherton, Chancellor
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1398 HOUSATONIC RIVER INITIATIVE; HOUSATONIC ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION LEAGUE, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, New England Region, Respondent, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY; HOUSATONIC REST OF RIV
In re Tesla Motors, Inc. Stockholder Litigationpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE TESLA MOTORS, INC. : Consolidated STOCKHOLDER LITIGATION : C.A. No. 12711-VCS MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: December 21, 2017 Date Decided: March 28, 2018 Jay W. Eisenhofer, Esquire and James J. Sabella, Esquire of Grant & Eisenhofer P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; Michael Hanrahan, Esquire, Paul A. Fioravanti, Jr.,
In re Tesla Motors, Inc. Stockholder Litigationpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE TESLA MOTORS, INC. : Consolidated STOCKHOLDER LITIGATION : C.A. No. 12711-VCS MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: December 21, 2017 Date Decided: March 28, 2018 Jay W. Eisenhofer, Esquire and James J. Sabella, Esquire of Grant & Eisenhofer P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; Michael Hanrahan, Esquire, Paul A. Fioravanti, Jr.,
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 52 v. HOFMEISTERpublic domain
OSCN Found Document:INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT # 52 v. HOFMEISTER INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT # 52 v. HOFMEISTER2020 OK 56Case Number: 117081Decided: 06/23/2020THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2020 OK 56, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT
Richard J. Tornetta v. Elon Muskpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RICHARD J. TORNETTA, Individually ) and on Behalf of All Others Similarly ) Situated and Derivatively on Behalf of ) Nominal Defendant TESLA, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2018-0408-KSJM ) ELON MUSK, ROBYN M.
Gatzke v. Christian (In Re Gatzke)public domain
365 B.R. 138 (2007) In re Donald A GATZKE, Debtor. Donald A Gatzke, Plaintiff, v. James Christian, Bearcat Drilling and Pump Company, LLC, Northstar Development of Montana, LLC, Northstar Properties, LLC, Glacier Crossroads, A Corporation, and Rocky Mountain Lumber Company LLC, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 06-60037-11, Adversary No. 06-00056. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 16–1031 Filed August 31, 2018 MYRON DENNIS BEHM, BURTON J. BROOKS, ROBBY LEE LANGSTON, DAVID LEON BRODSKY, JEFFREY R. OLSON, and GEOFF TATE SMITH, Appellants, vs. CITY OF CEDAR RAPIDS and GATSO USA, INC., Appellees. On review from the Iowa Court of Appeals. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Linn County, Christopher L. Bruns, Judge.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 16–1031 Filed August 31, 2018 MYRON DENNIS BEHM, BURTON J. BROOKS, ROBBY LEE LANGSTON, DAVID LEON BRODSKY, JEFFREY R. OLSON, and GEOFF TATE SMITH, Appellants, vs. CITY OF CEDAR RAPIDS and GATSO USA, INC., Appellees. On review from the Iowa Court of Appeals. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Linn County, Christopher L. Bruns, Judge.
NAACP v. AcuSport, Inc.public domain
271 F.Supp.2d 435 (2003) NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, Plaintiff, v. ACUSPORT, INC., et al., Defendants. Nos. 99 CV 3999(JBW), 99 CV 7037(JBW). United States District Court, E.D. New York. July 21, 2003. *436 *437 *438
East Texas Medical Center Gilmer v. Birder Porterpublic domain
ACCEPTED 12-14-00220-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 9/4/2015 3:01:53 PM
MEMORANDUM, ORDER, AND JUDGMENT FINDINGS OF FACT AND LAW WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge. Table of Contents PART ONE Summary of Case 446 I. Contentions of Parties.446 II. Factual Background.447 III. Law 448 IV. Procedures. rfX ZO V. Conclusions of Fact and Law. ^ 4^
ACCEPTED 03-14-00667-CV 3957344 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS