Cases

MARCUS, Circuit Judge: The disability programs administered under the Social Security Act "are of a size and extent difficult to comprehend." Richardson v. Perales , 402 U.S. 389 , 399,

659 F.Supp.2d 738 (2009) Michelle S. WASHINGTON, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. C/A No. 8:08-2592-RBH. United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Anderson/Greenwood Division. September 21, 2009. *740 Beatrice E. Whitten, Beatrice E. Whitten Law Office, Mt. Pleasant, SC, for Plaintiff. Marvi

PER CURIAM: Cornelius Washington appeals the district court’s judgment affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s (the “Commissioner”) denial of his application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. On appeal, Mr. Washington primarily argues that the Appeals Council erred when it refused to consi

MEMORANDUM OPINION ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, United States District Judge Plaintiff Geraldine Campfield applied to the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) for disability benefits and supplemental security income benefits in 2012, claiming that she was disabled due to

ORDER TANYA S. CHUTEAN, United States District Judge Upon careful consideration of the record in this case, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation filed on Feb. 17, 2017 (ECF No. 28), and the absence of any objections from either party thereto, the court hereby ADOPTS the Report of the Magistrate Judge and further ACCEPTS the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. It is therefore ORDERED that P

TASHIMA, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: I agree with the majority that the ALJ erred in discrediting Treichler’s medically determinable pain and symptom testimony based on a boilerplate credibility determination. I part company, however, with the majority’s remand for further proceedings. I would, instead, remand for the award of benefits. I, there

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, United States District Judge Plaintiff Wanda Kyler seeks judicial review pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) of the denial of social security disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) on November 2, 2012, following a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”). Pending before the Court are Plaintiffs

MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge. Plaintiff Juan A. Scott brings this pro se action seeking reversal of the decision made by the Commissioner of Social Security that he is not disabled under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1381-1383, and therefore not entitled to supplemental security income (SSI

*327 MEMORANDUM OPINION Beryl A. Howell, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Pro se Plaintiffs Virgie C. Gumpad and Jovita C. Sansano have brought this action under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). In a one-page handwritten Complaint (“Compl.”), Plaintiffs purport

OPINION OF THE COURT BARRY, Circuit Judge. This case — a case that involves the rights of the posthumously conceived children of a deceased wage earner and his widow — requires us to consider the intersection of new reproductive technologies and what is required to qualify for child survivor benefits under the Social Security Act (the “Act”). It goes without saying that these technologies were not within t

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief and appendix and supplement to the brief filed by the appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed November 8, 2010, be affirmed. Appellant has n

PER CURIAM: *1156 This case requires us to consider the boundaries of "payment based wholly on service as a member of a uniformed service" for the purposes of Social Security benefit calculations. We agree with the Social Security Administration's interpretation, and affirm the district c

650 F.Supp.2d 76 (2009) Alejandra D. DUCUSIN, Plaintiff v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 08-1905 (HHK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 5, 2009. *77 Alejandra B. Ducusin, La Union, Philippines, pro se. Fred Elmore Haynes, U.S. Attorney's Office, Washingt

578 F.3d 443 (2009) Clarence BRYANT, John C. Turner, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 08-6375, 08-6378. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: July 28, 2009. Decided and Filed: August 24, 2009. *444 ARGUED: Wolodymyr Iwan Cybriwsky, Law Office, Pr

601 F.Supp.2d 203 (2009) Aurea M. CALICA, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. Civil Action No. 08-0572 (RJL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 8, 2009. Aurea M. Calica, La Union, PH, pro se. Fred Elmore Haynes, U.S. Attorney's Office, Washington, DC, for Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION <

(2008) Rolando PALOMO, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. Civil Action No. 07-0745 (RWR). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 29, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge. Plaintiff brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of the decision of the

386 F.Supp.2d 1257 (2005) Robert G. STEPHEN, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. No. 6:04CV598ORL22JGG. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division. September 7, 2005. *1258 Shea A. Fugate, Law Office of Shea A. Fugate, Orlando, FL, for Plaintiff. Preeya M. Noronha, Washington, DC, Su

GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I concur in the result of the plurality’s opinion for the claimed disability period post-October 25, 1999. However, I respectfully dissent from the denial of plaintiffs claim for disability benefits for the period of May 30, 1996, through October 25, 1999. Regarding this portion of plaintiffs claim arising prior

SUMMARY ORDER Epifano Vasquez, pro se, appeals from an order and judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Leonard B. Sand, District Judge), granting the defendant’s motion to dismiss Vasquez’s action. For substantially the reasons stated by the district court, we affirm its judgment. See Vasquez v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., No. 01 Civ. 8587, 2002 U.S. Dist

OPINION ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Bethany K. Thacker appeals from the district court’s decision affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of Thacker’s claim for supplemental security income benefits. Thacker contends that the district court erred by failing to follow our decision in Howard v. Comm’r of Social Security, 276 F.3d 235 (6th Cir.2002). Thacker also contends