Cases

Amended.

GRAEFF, J. This case arises from two lease agreements, in which Washington Real Estate Investment Trust (“WRIT”), appellee/cross-appellant, leased two service stations located in the Westminster Shopping Center to the Carroll Independent Fuel Company, appellani/cross-appellee (“CIF”). After the leases were terminated, a dispute arose regarding: (1) the responsibility for cleaning up contamination found in the soil and groundwa

BENTON, Circuit Judge. Missouri statutes require African-style hair braiders to be licensed as barbers or cosmetologists. Ndioba “Joba” Niang and Tameka Stigers challenge this requirement under the Fourteenth Amendment. The district court1 granted summary judgment for the State. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Michael James Carroll appeals the tax court’s order dismissing his petition for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we dismiss for the reasons stated by the district court. Carroll v. Comm’r of Internal Rev

CHEN, Circuit Judge. Norma D. Carroll appeals from the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (“Veterans Court”) affirming a denial by the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (“Board”) of Mrs. Carroll’s claim to Dependency and Indemnity Compensation benefits. Carroll v, Shinseki, No. 12-2585, 2013 WL 3751775 (Vet.App. July 18, 2013) (unpublis

BARBERA, J. Petitioner, George Carroll, was tried before a jury in the Circuit Court for Frederick County and convicted of four counts of attempted armed robbery, four counts of conspiracy to commit those offenses, and related crimes. In his appeal to the Court of Special Appeals, Petitioner argued, among other claims of error, that the reasonable doubt instructions were constitutionally deficient and in violation of Maryland

Central Intelligence Agency Act, 50 U.S.C. §§ 3501-23; Debt Collection Act, 5 U.S.C. § 5514; Jurisdiction; Military Leave, 5 U.S.C. § 6323; Motion To Dismiss, RCFC 12(b)(1). MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BRADEN, Judge. I. RELEVANT FACTUAL BACKGROUND. 1

GRAEFF, J. A jury sitting in the Circuit Court for Frederick County convicted George J. Carroll, appellant, of four counts of attempted armed robbery, four counts of conspiracy to commit armed robbery, four counts of second degree assault, four counts of reckless endangerment, and four counts of false imprisonment.1 The court imposed concurrent sentences of 18 years on two of the convictions for

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Daniel B. Carroll appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter the district court’s judgment granting Vinnell Arabia, LLC’s motion to dismiss his complaint raising claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012), and 42 U.S.C. § 1981

Moylan, J. Our effort to pin a clear label on this appeal is at least tentatively inhibited by the ghost of anachronism. The appellant invokes the so-called Four Cent Rule. The Four Cent Rule was initially enacted by the General Assembly in 1978. 1 It was expressly designed to solve (or at least to ameliorate)

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Carrol Tremayne Washington, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent. Appellate Case No. 2021-000754 ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI Appeal from Newberry County J. Mark Hayes, II, Post-Conviction Relief Judge Opinion No. 6095

*652SUMMARY ORDER Robert W. Murray, Jr. appeals from: (1) the February 20, 2008, 536 F.Supp.2d 225, ruling of the district court granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment on Murray’s claim that his removal from office as the Business Manager/Financial Secretary of International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (“IBEW”) Local Union 35 violated the IBEW Constitution; (2) th

OPINION LeGROW, J. A long-time smoker of “light” cigarettes seeks to hold the tobacco company that sold the cigarettes liable for economic harm allegedly suffered by the plaintiff and members of a purported class that, if certified, would comprise smokers who purchased “light” cigarettes from the defendant. Confronted with a series of decisions in other jurisdictions denying class certification for simila

LEONE, J.A.D. *174The State has charged defendant Brandon M. Washington with two counts of attempted murder, and he is awaiting trial. In Docket No. A-1780-17, the State appeals the trial court's orders on November 28 and 29, 2017, and its denial of reconsideration on December 6, 2017. Those orders excluded the State's DNA evidence, denied it

667 F.3d 742 (2012) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Krispen S. CARROLL; David W. Ruskin; Tammy L. Terry; Thomas W. McDonald; Carl L. Bekofske, Defendants-Appellants. No. 10-1400. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: November 16, 2011. Decided and Filed: January 30, 2012. *743 AR

*652SUMMARY ORDER Robert W. Murray, Jr. appeals from: (1) the February 20, 2008, 536 F.Supp.2d 225, ruling of the district court granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment on Murray’s claim that his removal from office as the Business Manager/Financial Secretary of International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (“IBEW”) Local Union 35 violated the IBEW Constitution; (2) th

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 04-2-21613-3, Deborah D. Fleck, J., entered April 6, 2007. Affirmed by unpublished opinion per Cox, J., concurred in by Schindler, C.J., and Ellington, J.

536 F.Supp.2d 225 (2008) Robert W. MURRAY, Jr., Plaintiff, v. Frank J. CARROLL and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Defendants. No. 306cv1650 (WWE). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. February 20, 2008. *226 Leon M. Rosenblatt, Lynn M. Mahoney, West Hartford, CT, for Plaintiff. Robert D. Kurn

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Thurston County, No. 04-2-02359-6, Gary Tabor, J., entered April 1, 2005. Affirmed by unpublished opinion per Bridge-water, J., concurred in by Armstrong and Penoyar, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOHN G. HEYBURN II, District Judge. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) brought this civil action alleging violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) by Defendants Patrick' M. Carroll, James P. Carroll, William T. Carroll, David Mark Calcutt, Christopher T. Cal-cutt, David A. Stitt, John Monroe, and Stephen Somers. Defendants tra