⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Washington v. American Education Services”

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016-11-16 · Published · cited 2× · 670 F. App'x 184
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Starsha Sewell appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action raising various claims related to a default student loan. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. American Edu. Servs. /PHEAA, No. 8:15-cv-03076-DKC, 2016 WL 3460
District Court, District of Columbia · 2011-11-04 · Published · cited 4× · 823 F. Supp. 2d 28; 80 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1308; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128360; 2011 WL 5313816
823 F.Supp.2d 28 (2011) Donald EDMOND, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN EDUCATION SERVICES, Defendant. Civil Action No. 10-0578 (JDB). United States District Court, District of Columbia. November 4, 2011. *30 Donald Edmond, Washington, DC, pro se. Thomas J. Sippel, William David Day, Gill Sippel & Gallagher, Rockville, MD, for D
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2008-02-20 · Published · cited 2× · 383 B.R. 78; 2008 Bankr. LEXIS 454; 2008 WL 554284
383 B.R. 78 (2008) In re Daniel Christian HOFFER, Diane Sue Hoffer, Debtors. Daniel Christian Hoffer, et al., Plaintiffs, v. American Education' Services, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 05-58626, Adversary No. 07-2280. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. February 20, 2008. *79 Crystal I. Zellar, Z
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012-10-31 · Published · cited 0× · 483 F. App'x 576
JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed November 7, 2011, granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment be affirmed. The
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2019-06-20 · Published · cited 0×
06/20/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE April 15, 2019 Session WASHINGTON COUNTY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION ET AL. v. WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Washington County No. 17-CV-0428 John C. Rambo, Chancellor
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013-06-24 · Published · cited 3× · 71 A.3d 1070; 2013 WL 3155373; 2013 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 224
OPINION BY Judge LEAVITT. Billie Washington, Tina Smith, Opal Gibson, Pennsylvania Mental Health Consumers’ Association, Mental Health Association in Pennsylvania, Mental Health Association of Southeastern Pennsylvania, The Philadelphia Alliance, Drug and Alcohol Service Providers Organization of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Community Providers Association and Success Against All Odds (collectively, Petitioners
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014-10-07 · Published · cited 1× · 53 F. Supp. 3d 857; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 142990; 2014 WL 5019673
MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES C. CACHERIS, District Judge. The Court must decide whether the Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency (“Defendant” or “PHEAA”) is an “arm of the state” of Pennsylvania, such that it would enjoy immunity from suit under the Eleventh Amendment to the Constitution. Now before the Court is PHEAA’s Motion for Summary Judgment on that affirmative defense of immunity,
Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2025-03-11 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA PUBLISHED Present: Judges Beales, Athey and Callins Argued at Arlington, Virginia ATLANTIC KOREAN AMERICAN PRESBYTERY OPINION BY v. Record No. 1930-23-4 JUDGE CLIFFORD L. ATHEY, JR.
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-07-02 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION AND LEGAL SERVICES, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 25-306 (RDM) v. KRISTI NOEM, Secretary of Homeland Security, in her official capacity, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION On J
District Court, District of Columbia · 2018-08-20 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) WASHINGTON TENNIS & EDUCATION ) FOUNDATION, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 15-cv-02254 (APM)
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018-01-17 · Published · cited 34× · 880 F.3d 450
*454 OPINION RESTANI, Judge: Plaintiff-appellant Erotic Service Provider Legal, Education & Research Project; K.L.E.S.; C.V.; J.B.; and John Doe (collectively, “ESP”) appeal the district court’s dismissal of their
District Court, W.D. New York · 2016-11-22 · Published · cited 0× · 221 F. Supp. 3d 347; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 161998; 2016 WL 6875706
DECISION AND ORDER HON. MICHAEL A. TELESCA, United States District Judge I. Introduction Proceeding pro se, plaintiff Jermaine Washington (“plaintiff’), a current employee of defendant Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. (“defendant” or “Secu-ritas”), brings this employment discrimination action pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2Q00e et
District Court, District of Columbia · 2019-02-22 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 16-2476 (TJK) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION In 2007, Congress established the Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program (“PSLF” or “PS
District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2011-12-08 · Published · cited 0× · 895 F. Supp. 2d 763; 2011 WL 8993939; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 155243
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS JOHN PRESTON BAILEY, District Judge. I. Introduction Pending before this Court is the Motion to Dismiss by Defendants American Public Education, Inc., Wallace E. Boston, Jr., and Harry T. Wilkins [Doc. 59], which was filed on March 10, 2011. Following an extended briefing period, the plaintiffs filed their response in opposition [
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-09-30 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) AMERICAN TRANSPARENCY, ) d/b/a OpenTheBooks.com, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil No. 21-cv-02821
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-06-03 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ASSOCIATION FOR EDUCATION FINANCE AND POLICY, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 1:25-cv-00999 (TNM) v. LINDA MCMAHON, in her official capacity as Secretary of Education, et al., Defendants. NATIONAL ACADEMY OF EDUCATION, et al.,
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019-02-08 · Published · cited 113× · 915 F.3d 297
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1206 EVANGELINE J. PARKER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. REEMA CONSULTING SERVICES, INC., Defendant - Appellee. ---------------------------------------------------- EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION; NAT
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007-01-24 · Published · cited 2× · 219 F. App'x 692
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I agree that the appellants have not demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits of their action for injunctive relief based on the Northwest Forest Plan *702and the National Environmental Policy Act’s requirement that opposing
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-05-21 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) SOUTHERN EDUCATION ) FOUNDATION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 25-1079 (PLF)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 2013-05-13 · Published · cited 0× · 492 B.R. 79; 2013 WL 2034770; 2013 Bankr. LEXIS 2050
MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES D. WALKER, JR., Bankruptcy Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff-Debtor’s complaint to determine dischargeability of a debt. This is a core matter within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I). After considering the pleadings, the evidence, and the applicable authorities, the Court enters the following findings of fact and conclusions of law in conformance with F