⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Warfield v. Baker”

State v. Warfieldpublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993-04-29 · Published · cited 10× · 854 S.W.2d 9; 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 626; 1993 WL 137991
854 S.W.2d 9 (1993) STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Samuel WARFIELD, Defendant-Appellant. No. 18225. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two. April 29, 1993. Motion for Rehearing or to Transfer Denied May 21, 1993. Scott E. Thomsen, Jackson, for defendant-appellant. Cristy L. Baker-Neel, Pros. Atty., Scott Count
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2010-12-08 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs November 10, 2010 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JERMARIO DIVINE WARFIELD Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2009-I-1560 J. Randall Wyatt, Jr., Judge No. M2010-00834-CCA-R3-CD - Filed December 8, 2010 The defendant, Jermario Divine Warfield, pled guilty in the Davidson County Crimin
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2021-09-22 · Published · cited 0×
09/22/2021 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs August 11, 2021 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JERRY DALE BAKER Appeal from the Circuit Court for Maury County No. 27235 Stella L. Hargrove, Judge ___________________________________
Kentucky Supreme Court · 2015-08-20 · Published · cited 2× · 473 S.W.3d 588; 2015 Ky. LEXIS 1748; 2015 WL 4967131
OPINION OF THE COURT BY JUSTICE ABRAMSON Two sets of Harlan County landowners, the Bakers1 and certain heirs (together with their spouses) of Chester Jackson (the “Jackson heirs”)2 jointly brought suit in Harlan Circuit Court seeking, among other things, damages'and a declaration of their rights under oil and gas leases executed in 2004 with Daugherty
Schlytter v. Bakerpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978-09-22 · Published · cited 3× · 580 F.2d 848
ALVIN B. RUBIN, Circuit Judge: This case involves the constitutionality of Fla.Stat. §§ 718.302(3) and 718.401(8) [formerly 711.231] which prohibits escalation clauses in condominium leases when such clauses are keyed to national commodity or consumer price indexes. The Florida Supreme Court has held that the statute is prospective only on its application. Fleeman v. Case, Fla.S.Ct.1976, 342 So.2d 815; therefore, th
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996-10-02 · Published · cited 0×
_____________ No. 95-3325 _____________ United States of America, * * Plaintiff-Appellee, * * v. * * Antwon A. Warfield, * * Defendant-Appellant. * Appeals fr
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1975-05-05 · Published · cited 0× · 258 Ark. 61; 522 S.W.2d 402; 1975 Ark. LEXIS 1592
Frank Holt, Justice. This is an action to quiet title. Appellants, the natural children of A. W. Baker, deceased, petitioned the chancellor to declare them the owners of an undivided 6/7ths interest in property owned by their father. The chancellor held that Baker owned this property with his wife as tenants by the entirety. Therefore, upon Baker’s death in 1951 the property went to his wife rather than to B
United States Board of Tax Appeals · 1938-10-18 · Published · cited 0× · 38 B.T.A. 907; 1938 BTA LEXIS 808
C. GRIFFITH WARFIELD, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.Warfield v. CommissionerDocket No. 89170.United States Board of Tax Appeals
State v. Bakerpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000-04-03 · Published · cited 20× · 739 N.E.2d 819; 137 Ohio App. 3d 628
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 630 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 631 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE N
Idaho Supreme Court · 1941-12-13 · Published · cited 0× · 120 P.2d 243; 63 Idaho 328; 1941 Ida. LEXIS 80
Action to quiet title, contested by the following heirs of Harry A. Warfield who died February 27, 1934. James aged 13 years, son of Warfield and his second wife, Nena S. Warfield, appearing through his guardian, E.E. Kearns, and as transferree of his half-brother Thomas aged 22 years, son of Warfield and his first wife, now deceased. George and Alice, aged 9 and 6 years respectively, children of Warfield's third wife, *Page 331 Irene, appearing through t
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997-12-05 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE MIDDLE SECTION AT NASHVILLE FILED SANDRA K. BAKER (ABROMS), ) December 5, 1997 ) Cecil W. Crowson Plaintiff/Appellee, ) Appellate Court Clerk ) ) Davidson Circuit VS. ) No. 83D-522
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996-10-02 · Published · cited 98× · 97 F.3d 1014; 45 Fed. R. Serv. 1005; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 25979; 1996 WL 557343
HANSEN, Circuit Judge. Antwon A. Warfield and Brian M. Thomas appeal from the final judgments of the dis *1018 trict court 1 after they were convicted of armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and (d), conspiracy to commi
Keyser v. Warfieldpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1904-11-30 · Published · cited 10× · 59 A. 189; 100 Md. 72; 1904 Md. LEXIS 119
The appellee sued the appellants' intestate to recover one-half of the amounts paid by the appellee on two promissory *Page 78 notes discounted by the Merchants National Bank of Baltimore. Each of the notes was originally in this form: $2,500.00. July 31st, 1896. On demand after date Maryland Mnfg. and Construction Co. promise to pay to the order of ____ twenty-five hundred dollars at Merchants National Bank. Value re
Shirley v. Warfieldpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Texas · 1896-02-15 · Published · cited 5× · 34 S.W. 390; 12 Tex. Civ. App. 449; 1896 Tex. App. LEXIS 215
The District Court entered judgment in favor of appellees as the heirs of James H. Warfield for all the land sued for except the part claimed by T.E. Shirley and L.A. Scott, upon the following conclusions of fact, which we approve, except the last clause of the second finding: "1. The James H. Warfield survey No. 10, in Jones County, Texas, the land in controversy, made by virtue of certificate No. 984, issued by the Board of Land Commissioners of Harris County, on December 2, 1850, wa
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967-03-14 · Published · cited 31× · 424 Pa. 555; 227 A.2d 177; 1967 Pa. LEXIS 815
Opinion by Mr. Justice O’Brien, Barbara Warfield was indicted in Allegheny County for murder and voluntary manslaughter. Defendant’s counsel filed a pretrial motion to suppress her written statement given to police following her arrest, wherein she had admitted robbing and killing the victim. A hearing was held on September 11, 1964, before the Honorable Ralph H. Smith, who denied defendant’s motion to suppre
Warfield v. Chaffepublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1876-02-14 · Published · cited 6× · 91 U.S. 690; 23 L. Ed. 383; 1875 U.S. LEXIS 1423
Mr. Chief Justice Waite delivered the opinion of the court. ■ This action was commenced in the Fourteenth District Court in and for the Parish of Ouachita, La., to recover the amount due upon a note made by'Mrs. Warfielá, the plaintiff in error, to W. J. Q. Baker, and by him indorsed to the plajntiffs below, — John Chaffe & Brother,-: — and also to enforce
Warfield v. Stubbspublic domain
Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1872-07-15 · Published · cited 0× · 24 La. Ann. 569
Ludeling, C. J. This suit is to enforce the obligation contracted by the defendants, sureties on a bond, given to release movable property seized under a writ of sequestration. The defense is that the sureties are discharged from all liability on the bond, because Oliver was required by the lessors to remove from premises leased the movables sequestered, as thereby they lost their privilege and right of pledg
Schlytter v. Bakerpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978-09-22 · Published · cited 28× · 580 F.2d 848; 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 8830
580 F.2d 848 Robert O. SCHLYTTER and Marion C. Schlytter, his wife,Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.A. L. BAKER, Individually and as Head of the Department ofBusiness Regulations, a Department of the State of Florida,and C. R. Lynch, Individually and as Director of theDivision of Land Sales and Condominiums, a Division of theDepartment of Business Regulations, Defendants-Appellees. No. 78-1060. <
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950-02-13 · Published · cited 13× · 181 F.2d 273; 86 U.S. App. D.C. 161; 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 2591
PRETTYMAN, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia construing a will. 80 F.Supp. 610. The action was brought by the trustees under the will and was decided on a motion for judgment on the pleadings filed by the guardian ad litem for certain infant defendants.
Reed v. Bakerpublic domain
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1973-06-04 · Published · cited 14× · 495 S.W.2d 849; 254 Ark. 631; 1973 Ark. LEXIS 1563
495 S.W.2d 849 (1973) Johnny REED et al., Appellants, v. Ralph BAKER et al., Appellees. No. 73-24. Supreme Court of Arkansas. June 4, 1973. Rehearing Denied July 9, 1973. *850 Wommack & Lineberger by Erwin L. Davis, Fayetteville, for appellants. W. Q. Hall, Huntsville, Murphy, Carlisle & Taylor, Fa