Cases

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

ORDER The appellant having failed to pay the docketing fee required by Federal Circuit Rule 52(a)(1) within the time permitted by the rules, it is ORDERED that the notice of appeal be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied. Same case below, 591 F.3d 1279.

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by the appellant. It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed September 30, 2005, be affirmed. The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying reconsideration of its order denying mandamus relief.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit January 7, 2010 PUBLISH Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Cour

581 F.3d 1272 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wendel R. WARDELL, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-1108. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. September 22, 2009. *1276 Mark D. Jarmie, Jarmie & Associates, Albuquerque, NM, for the Defendant-Appellant. Troy A. Eid, United States Attorney,

PER CURIAM. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue assessed a tax penalty against Steven R. Wardell for filing a frivolous tax return for 1982. Wardell paid a statutory percentage of the penalty, then filed suit, pro se, against the United States seeking a refund. The District Court 1 granted the defendant’s motion to dis

HOLMES, Circuit Judge. Defendant Wendel R. Wardell, Jr., was charged, along with three codefendants, with (1) conspiring to retaliate against a witness, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1513(b)(1) and § 371 (2005),1 and (2) retaliating against a witness, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1513(b)(1), and aiding and abetting the commission of this crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2. The testimony of the w

ORDER AND JUDGMENT** TIMOTHY M. TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judge. While incarcerated in a Colorado state prison, Wendel R. Wardell and other prisoners engaged in a scheme to obtain fraudulent tax refunds by submitting false tax returns. The scheme involved submitting false tax returns in their own names, and in the names of other inmates, to obtain refunds to which they were not entit

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Petty, O’Brien and Senior Judge Frank Argued by teleconference PUBLISHED WARDELL ORTHOPAEDICS, P.C. OPINION BY v. Record No. 1930-19-1 JUDGE MARY GRACE O’BRIEN

159 F.3d 1361 U.S.v.Wardell* NO. 97-9028 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. September 23, 1998 Appeal From: N.D.Ga. ,No.96001771CR1CC 1 Affirmed.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Albany County, entered on November 9, 1973, affirmed, without costs, on the opinion of Hughes, J., at Special Term. Staley, Jr., J. P., Greenblott, Sweeney, Kane and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 96-2586 ___________ United States of America, * * Plaintiff - Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v.

LOKEN, Circuit Judge. Wardell Washington appeals his bank fraud conviction and sentence. He raises upward departure, suppression, and venue issues and argues that the district judge 1 should not have conducted the sentencing after participating in earlier plea discussions. We affirm. In June 199

38 F.3d 1215NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. Wardell COLEMAN, Petitioner-Appellant,v.UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. No. 94-5127. United States Court of

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.