Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Ward v. Stamps”
People v. Stampspublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. WILLIAM STAMPS, Defendant and Appellant. S255843 First Appellate District, Division Four A154091 Alameda County Superior Court 17CR010629 June 25, 2020 Just
People v. Stampspublic domain
Filed 10/28/16 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, A142424 v. (Contra Costa County LATANYA A. STAMPS, Supe
People v. Stampspublic domain
Opinion STREETER, J.— Appellant Latanya A. Stamps was convicted of multiple drug possession offenses after drugs in both pill and crystalline form were discovered in her car, purse or clothing on four different dates from October through December 2012. She appeals, arguing the court improperly admitted the testimony of an expert criminalist who identified
Vitek v. Wardpublic domain
[Cite as Vitek v. Ward, 2024-Ohio-5151.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF MEDINA ) MEGAN VITEK C.A. No. 2024CA0005-M Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE BRIAN WARD
Kiernan v. Wardpublic domain
[Cite as Kiernan v. Ward, 2022-Ohio-1303.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) MELISSA KIERNAN C.A. No. 29994 Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE JONATHAN WARD
Vitek v. Wardpublic domain
[Cite as Vitek v. Ward, 2022-Ohio-1797.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF MEDINA ) MEGAN E. VITEK C.A. No. 21CA0004-M Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE BRIAN E. WARD
Ward v. Wardpublic domain
[Cite as Ward v. Ward, 2012-Ohio-5658.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) MELISSA M. WARD C.A. No. 26372 Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE SHAINE E. WARD
Yaquinto v. Ward (In re Ward)public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Barbara J. Houser, United States Bankruptcy Judge Before the Court are the Motion for Summary Judgment [AP No. 141]1 and brief in support [AP No. 142] (the “Motion for Summary Judgment”) filed by defendants Amanda Ward (“Amanda”), Glenn Properties Corp. a/k/a Glenn Properties, Inc. (“GPC”), and Best Account Rece
Ward v. Kiernanpublic domain
[Cite as Ward v. Kiernan, 2019-Ohio-2306.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) JONATHAN WARD C.A. No. 29186 Appellant v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE MELISSA KIERNAN
Schmitt v. Wardpublic domain
[Cite as Schmitt v. Ward, 2018-Ohio-4401.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) MELISSA SCHMITT C.A. Nos. 28877 28910 Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT SHAINE WARD
Estate of Brown v. Wardpublic domain
Estate of H. Gregory Brown v. Carrie M. Ward, et al., No. 1009, Sept. Term 2023. Opinion by Arthur, J. CREDIT GRANTOR REVOLVING CREDIT PROVISIONS—LICENSING REQUIRMENTS The Credit Grantor Revolving Credit Provisions subtitle, codified at Subtitle 9 of Title 12 of the Commercial Law Article of the Maryland Code (“CL”), governs a “revolving credit plan” when a “credit grantor” offers the plan to a consumer borrower pursuant to that subtitle. The term “credit grantor” includes “[a]ny person who ac
Ward v. Hutchinsonpublic domain
JOSEPHINE LINKER HART, Justice Bruce Earl Ward appeals from an order of the Pulaski County Circuit Court dismissing with prejudice his civil rights case in which he challenged the conditions of his confinement in the Varner Supermax Unit of the Arkansas Department of Correction. On appeal, Ward argues that the order of dismissal with prejudice should be vacated because the circuit court lacked jurisdiction to enter it.
Stamps v. Jefferson Parish Administrationpublic domain
30 So.3d 19 (2009) Michael STAMPS, Glenn Miller, Michael Chauvin, Billie Hartline and Randolph Doucet v. JEFFERSON PARISH ADMINISTRATION (Public Works-Sewerage). No. 09-CA-443. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. December 8, 2009. *21 Scott W. McQuaig, Attorney at Law, Metairie, LA, for Plaintiff/Appellant. Clemen
State v. Wardpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 111,640 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. CHRISTOPHER R. WARD, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. On the facts of this case, there was insufficient evidence to supp
Schmitt v. Wardpublic domain
[Cite as Schmitt v. Ward, 2018-Ohio-1043.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) MELISSA SCHMITT C.A. No. 28694 28700 Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT SHAINE WARD
Schmitt v. Wardpublic domain
[Cite as Schmitt v. Ward, 2017-Ohio-6975.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) MELISSA M. SCHMITT C.A. No. 28219 Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE SHAINE WARD
Schmitt v. Wardpublic domain
[Cite as Schmitt v. Ward, 2016-Ohio-5693.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) MELISSA M. SCHMITT C.A. No. 27805 Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE SHAINE E. WARD
Ward, Ray Anthonypublic domain
.. ·11 ,30S -0 I § § Court of Criminal Appeals § of Texas Ray Anthony Ward Applica11t §
Allen Ward Cox v. State of Floridapublic domain
Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC2022-1553 ____________ ALLEN WARD COX, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee/Cross-Appellant. July 11, 2024 SASSO, J. Allen Ward Cox appeals a sentence of death imposed during a resen
Lloyd Ward, Lloyd Ward, PC. v. Hawkins, Kellypublic domain
OPINION Opinion by Justice FILLMORE. Appellants Lloyd Ward, Lloyd Ward, P.C, Lloyd Ward & Associates, and Lloyd Ward Group, P.C. appeal the denial of their motion to vacate a Kansas default judgment in favor of appellee Kelly Hawkins. In three issues, appellants contend the trial court (1) abused its discretion by not granting their