Cases

08/29/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE April 13, 2022 Session WILLIAM LEE RUNION, JR. v. DIANNA LYNN MASHBURN RUNION Appeal from the Chancery Court for Washington County No. 19-DM-0322 John C. Rambo, Chancellor ___________________________________

615 N.E.2d 8 (1993) 245 Ill. App.3d 470 185 Ill.Dec. 713 Dallas RUNION, Appellee, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION et al. (Owens-Illinois, Inc., Appellant). No. 5-92-0019 WC. Appellate Court of Illinois, Fifth District. May 26, 1993. Don W. Ward, Joanne Turner Stevenson, Pessin, Baird, Belsheim & Wells, Belleville, for

204 Ga. App. 833 (1992) 420 S.E.2d 763 CHERRY et al. v. WARD. A92A0268. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided June 23, 1992. Reconsideration Denied July 8, 1992. Billy W. Crecelius, Jr., for appellants. I. Allen Meadors, for appellee. SOGNIER, Chief Judge. William Ward brought suit against B.

141 F.3d 111 26 Media L. Rep. 1545 Charles H. WILSON; Geraldine E. Wilson; Raquel Wilson,next friend/mother of Valencia Snowden, a minor,Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.Harry LAYNE, Deputy, United States Marshal, Supervisor forthe Washington Area, Operation Gunsmoke; JosephL. Perkins; James A. Olivo, Defendants-Appellants,andRaymond M. Kight, Sheriff, Montgomery County, Maryland;John Doe,

256 F.Supp.2d 768 (2003) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. State of TENNESSEE, et al., Defendants, and People First of Tennessee, et al., Intervenors, Parent-Guardian Association of Arlington Developmental Center, Intervenors. No. 92-2062-D/A. United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division. February 21, 2003.

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ COMPLIANCE WITH EMERGENCY PROVISIONS AND ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO FIND PARTIAL COMPLIANCE AND LIFT SANCTIONS McCALLA, District Judge. INTRODUCTION This case is before the Court for a determination regarding compliance by the State of Tennessee, Governor Sundquist, Commissioner Cardwell, and Superintendent Jackson with the provisions of the Emergency

05/02/2025 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON November 12, 2024 Session CITY OF MILAN, TENNESSEE, ET AL. v. FREDERICK H. AGEE Appeal from the Chancery Court for Gibson County No. 24295 Michael Mansfield, Chancellor ___________________________________

07/26/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE May 29, 2018 Session CORT DONDERO, ET UX. v. ACCURAY INCORPORATED, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County No. 15C1366 Ward Jeffrey Hollingsworth, Judge ___________________________________

OPINION OF THE COURT BY CHIEF JUSTICE MINTON *434A group of plaintiffs, claiming for themselves and for others similarly situated, brought the underlying action in the trial court for backpay and statutory damages under Kentucky's prevailing-wage law, Kentucky Revised Statute (KRS) 337.505 -550; and the trial court granted their motion to certi

NO. 07-03-0208-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL C MAY 26, 2004 ______________________________ FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE COMPANY,

OPINION BY PANELLA, J. This is the latest in a string of cases involving corrupt political officials. We consider, among other things, a challenge that Section 1108(a) of the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act is unconstitutionally vague, both as applied and facially, and overbroad. As explained in detail below, we quash the appeal at 2168 MDA 2012 and af

NO. 07-03-0208-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL C MAY 26, 2004 ______________________________ FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE COMPANY,

NO. 07-03-0208-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL C MAY 26, 2004 ______________________________ FORTIS BENEFITS IN

01/26/2021 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE May 19, 2020 Session1 CLARISSA BIDWELL EX REL. JAMES BIDWELL, ET AL. v. TIMOTHY A. STRAIT M.D., ET AL. Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals Circuit Court for Hamilton County

By Judge Clifford R. Weckstein The plaintiff filed this suit under the Federal Employers Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. § 51 et seq. (Motion for Judgment (“M/J”), ¶ 2; Demurrer, ¶ 1.) Defendant Norfolk Southern Railway Company demurred, objecting to the manner in which the plaintiff described duties that the FELA imposes upon a railroad and to some of the adjectives and adverbs that the plaintiff employed in pleading his

BY JUDGE CHARLES E. POSTON This case comes before the Court on the Defendants’ demurrers to the Plaintiffs Second Amended Bill of Complaint. The Plaintiff pleaded three claims against the Defendants: (1) breach of contract or fiduciary duty, (2) conspiracy to commit constructive fraud, and (3) conspiracy to commit actual fraud. The Court has already overruled a demurrer to the first count leaving only the issue of whether th

By Judge Clifford R. Weckstein According to the pleadings, the plaintiff, Lorette Lemond, is a former employee of the defendant, Viamac, Inc. The defendant operates a number of restaurants. In a two-count motion for judgment, Lemond claims damages against Viamac for violation of Virginia’s “insulting words statute,” Virginia Code § 8.01-45, and for defamation. Viamac has demurred to both counts. In her plead

By Judge Clifford r. Weckstein The defendant, as executor of the Estate of Roger W. Smith, says that the plaintiff, Realstar Realtors, L.L.C., cannot possibly prove its claim that the estate owes Realstar a commission as a result of the sale of a building. Even if he is right, his demurrer to the plaintiffs amended motion for judgment must be overruled. A demurrer merely “tests the sufficiency of factual a

08/28/2020 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE June 9, 2020 Session DEBORAH D. BARTLEY ET AL. v. TINY NUNLEY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF ANTHONY GENE NUNLEY Appeal from the Chancery Court for Carter County No. 29844

[Cite as Ciotto v. Hinkle, 2019-Ohio-3809.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT HURON COUNTY The Estate of Linda Ciotto, et al. Court of Appeals No. H-18-011 Appellants Trial Court No. CVC 20160644 v. Billie A. Hinkle DECISION AND JUDGMENT Appellee