⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

6 opinions for “Ward v. Las Americas Multimedia Group LLC”

Supreme Court of the United States · 2023-06-30 · Published · cited 85× · 600 U.S. 570
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 600 U. S. Part 1 Pages 570–640 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 30, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-10-09 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT GOPHER MEDIA LLC, a Nevada No. 24-2626 Limited Liability Corporation D.C. No. formerly known as Local Clicks 3:21-cv-01909- doing business as Doctor Multimedia; RBM-VET AJAY THAKORE, an individual, Plaintiffs - Appellants, OPINION v
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-04-21 · Published · cited 80× · 135 F.4th 739
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BRANDON BRISKIN, on behalf of No. 22-15815 himself and those similarly situated, D.C. No. 4:21-cv- Plaintiff-Appellant, 06269-PJH v. OPINION SHOPIFY, INC.; SHOPIFY (USA), INC.; SHOPIFY PAYMENTS (USA), INC., Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the U
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014-03-31 · Published · cited 4× · 11 F. Supp. 3d 622; 88 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 378; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44758; 2014 WL 1308699
OPINION AND ORDER MARK S. DAVIS, District Judge. This matter is currently before the Court on two motions filed by plaintiff Virginia Innovation Sciences, Inc. (hereinafter “Plaintiff’ or ‘VIS”) regarding a counterclaim advanced by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively “Samsung” or “Defendants”). ECF Nos. 141,
District Court, E.D. New York · 2011-05-16 · Published · cited 10× · 792 F. Supp. 2d 343; 2011 WL 1901645
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge: I.Introduction...............................................................347 II.Facts.....................................................................349 A. Defendant’s Childhood..................................................349
District Court, C.D. California · 2007-10-22 · Published · cited 23× · 247 F.R.D. 98; 2007 WL 4291967
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION [79] AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS [74] STEPHEN V. WILSON, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This Multi-District Litigation (“MDL”) consists of twenty-two class actions from across the country against Defendant Clear Channel Communications, Inc. and its subsidiaries.1 The