Cases

Plaintiff Tyrone Horton was born on 3 June 1992. On 18 June 2002, through his guardian ad litem, plaintiff filed the instant action in Wake County Superior Court. According to the allegations in the Complaint, defendant Housing Authority of the City of Raleigh, North Carolina owned and operated the property where plaintiff resided with his family from his birth until on or about 1 February 1996. The paint present in defendant's property was manufactured and sold before 1978 a

523 F.3d 293 (2008) Dennis GREEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF RALEIGH; Jane Perlov, individually and in her official capacity as Chief of Police for the City of Raleigh, Defendants-Appellees. No. 07-1351. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued: January 29, 2008. Decided: April 16, 2008. *297 A

341 S.W.3d 716 (2011) RIVER CITY DRYWALL, INC., et al., Appellants, v. RALEIGH PROPERTIES, INC., et al., Respondents. Nos. ED 94990, ED 94991. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three. May 17, 2011. *718 Thomas G. Berndsen, Michael J. Rolwes, St. Louis, MO, for appellants. Martin W. Blanchard, Michael C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th day of March 2005 by American Civil Liberties Union of NC Legal Foundation, Inc. and the John Locke Foundation for leave to file Amici Curiae Brief:"Motion Allowed. Unless already submitted, the Amici Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i). By order of the Court in conference this the 8th day of March

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 2nd day of February 2005 by N.C. League of Municipalities for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:"Motion Allowed. Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i). By order of the Court in conference this the 3rd day of February 2005."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd day of March 2005 by Plaintiff for Leave to File a Reply Brief:"Motion Allowed. By order of the Court in conference this the 23rd day of March 2005."

ORDER JAMES C. DEVER III, Chief United States District Judge Plaintiffs, individual voters registered in Wake County, North Carolina and the Raleigh Wake Citizens Association (“RWCA”), an organization dedicated to the interests of African-Americans in Wake County, (collectively “plaintiffs”) challenge the North Carolina General Assembly’s (“General Assembly”) 2013 redistricting plan for electing the Wake Cou

PER CURIAM. DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-2100 KEITH WARD, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. AUTOZONERS, LLC, Defendant – Appellant. ------------------------------ EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Amicus Supporting Appellee.

The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before former Deputy Commissioner Pittman and the briefs and oral arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing party has shown good ground to reconsider the evidence and amend the Opinion and Award. * * * * * * * * * * * The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered into by the parties at the hearing as: STIPUL

782 F.Supp. 1097 (1991) Charles R. WARD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. COLUMBUS COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, et al., Defendants, and Helen Gamble, et al., Intervening Defendants. No. 90-20-CIV-7-BR. United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Wilmington Division. December 17, 1991. *1098 Anita Sue Hodgkiss, Leslie J. Winner, F

The plaintiff was injured on April 1, 1988 and received temporary total disability benefits from that date through August 22, 1988. From August 23, 1988 through September 15, 1988, the plaintiff was able to return to work, with some accommodation, and received full, pre-injury wages. Thereafter, from September 16, 1988 through March 29, 1989, he again received temporary total disability benefits before again returning to work at full wages from March 30, 1989 through February 6, 1990. Ther

ORDER McMILLAN, District Judge. On December 18, 1980, four prisoners, Wayne Brooks, Clarence Wheeler, Lee Roy Steele, and Kenneth Helms, filed this suit, pro se, against Jack Ward, Superintendent of the Union County Prison Unit, Subsidiary # 4550, of the North Carolina Department of Correction. They sought damages, injunctive relief and declaratory relief, on behalf of themselves and all white pr

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1684 Doc: 61 Filed: 05/30/2023 Pg: 1 of 50 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-1684 DARRYL HOWARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CITY OF DURHAM; DARRELL DOWDY, in his individual and official capacities; MICHELE SOUCIE,

The results of Dr. Timmons' evaluation were received by the Commission on April 29, 1994 in the form of medical notes by Dr. Timmons dated April 20th and April 24th of 1994. IT IS ORDERED that these medical documents are admitted into evidence. N.C.G.S. § 97-85. Upon review of all of the competent evidence of record with reference to the errors assigned, and finding no good ground to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, rehear the

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1383 Doc: 39 Filed: 07/23/2025 Pg: 1 of 57 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-1383 ZACHARY HEBB, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CITY OF ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA; BEN WOODY, individually and in his official cap

USCA4 Appeal: 21-2431 Doc: 49 Filed: 07/27/2022 Pg: 1 of 64 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-1533 LATASHA HOLLOWAY; GEORGIA ALLEN, Plaintiffs – Appellees, v. THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH; t

CLARK, Judge. *60The plaintiff challenges as error the trial court’s granting of defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The plaintiff first argues that there were several genuine issues of material fact as to defendant’s negligence. We see no need to address each of these factual issues because the uncon-tradicted testimony and statements in the suppor

USCA4 Appeal: 21-1533 Doc: 93 Filed: 07/27/2022 Pg: 1 of 64 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-1533 LATASHA HOLLOWAY; GEORGIA ALLEN, Plaintiffs – Appellees, v. THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH; t

Richard D. Bennett, United States District Judge *469MEMORANDUM OPINION In 2015, Defendant Ocean City, Maryland ("Ocean City" or "the City") enacted a set of regulations ("the New Ordinance") that govern where, how, and when individuals may perform on certain areas of the Ocean City boardwalk. The New Ordinance was the