Cases

*1546Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, denied.

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Yan Hua Wang, a native and citizen of China, seeks review of a July 21, 2014, decision of the BIA affirming a July 11, 2013, decision of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying her motion to rescind and reopen. In re Yan Hua Wang, No. A076 022 877 (BIA July 21, 2014), aff'g No. A076 022 877 (Immig. Ct. Buffalo July 11, 2013). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedura

F. Dennis Saylor IV, United States District Judge This is a putative class action alleging violations of Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act of 1934. The plaintiff class purchased common stock of ReWalk Robotics, Ltd. between September 12, 2014 (the date of its initial public offering ("IPO")) and February 29, 2016. The consolidated amended complaint alleges that ReWalk,

I. Background A. Factual Background The facts are set forth as described in the consolidated amended complaint.1 1. Overview Defendant ReWalk Robotics, Ltd., formerly known as Argo Medical Technologies, Inc., is a medical device company. It designs and develops exoskeletons, which are

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Butler, J.), entered October 25, 2013, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that they did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident, and (2) a judgment of

PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 30th day of April, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Saralee Evans, J.), entered August 16, 2011, inter alia, dissolving the parties’ marriage on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment of plaintiff by defendant (Domestic Relations Law § 170 [1]), and ordering defendant to pay plaintiff counsel fees, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Defendant’s present appellate arguments with respect to the dissolution of the marriage were resolved by thi

OPINION The trial court granted Yan Ju Wang's petition for a writ of administrative mandate compelling the Department of Motor Vehicles *Page 618 (DMV) to set aside its revocation of Wang's class C driver's license. The DMV appeals, and we affirm. BACKGROUND The facts necessary to our decision are not in dispute. The trial court provided the following useful summary: "[Wang], the holder of a valid Class C (

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Yan Ping Wang, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a September 25, 2007 order of the BIA affirming the May 6, 2005 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Brigitte Laforest denying Wang’s application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Yan Ping Wang a.k.a. Min Lin, No. A97 390 759 (B.I.A. Sept. 25, 2

505 F.3d 615 (2007) Yan SONG WANG, Zhu Lin and Tao Wang, Petitioners, v. Peter D. KEISLER, Acting Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. No. 05-1780. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued January 9, 2007. Decided September 20, 2007. *616 Edwin R. McCullough (argued), Chicago, IL, for

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Saralee Evans, J.), entered August 16, 2011, inter alia, dissolving the parties’ marriage on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment of plaintiff by defendant (Domestic Relations Law § 170 [1]), and ordering defendant to pay plaintiff counsel fees, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Defendant’s present appellate arguments with respect to the dissolution of the marriage were resolved by thi

17 N.Y.3d 950 (2011) 959 N.E.2d 1022 936 N.Y.S.2d 74 2011 NY Slip Op 90333 YING JING YAN, Respondent, v. KE-EN WANG, Appellant. Not in source Court of Appeals of New York. Decided November 22, 2011. Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that the or

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-25-00344-CV ___________________________ CONGHUA YAN, Appellant V. FUYAN WANG, Appellee On Appeal from the 48th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 048-344791-23 Before Bassel, Womack, and Wallach, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINIO

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION of this petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the petition for review is GRANTED, the BIA’s decision is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this decision. Yan Hong Wang, through counsel, petitions for review of the BIA decision reversing Immigration Judge (“IJ”

MEMORANDUM ** Yan Quin Wang and Yan Zhu Wang, natives and citizens of China, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision, affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) order denying their applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. When, as here, the BIA aff

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Saralee Evans, J.), entered November 18, 2010, which, after a nonjury trial, granted plaintiffs application for a divorce on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Plaintiffs testimony that defendant directed her to have an abortion against her wishes and did not visit her during her two-week convalescence; that defendant often worked late into the evening a

716 S.E.2d 646 (2011) Dr. YAN-MIN WANG, Petitioner, v. UNC-CH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE and Dr. William Snider, Respondents. No. COA10-1021. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. October 4, 2011. *647 Alan McSurely, Chapel Hill, for petitioner. Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Special Deputy Attorney General Gary R. Govert, for resp

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 05-1780 YAN SONG WANG, ZHU LIN and TAO WANG, Petitioners, v. PETER D. KEISLER, Acting Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. ____________ Petition for Review of an Order of the

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, denied.